Below is a comprehensive analysis of AISAFX based on the requested criteria, including online complaint information, risk level assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. The official website provided is http://en.aisafx.com. Since no direct information about AISAFX was found in the provided search results, this analysis relies on general methodologies for evaluating brokers, supplemented by real-time checks where possible, and critical examination of potential risks.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

• Findings: No specific complaints about AISAFX were identified in the provided search results or readily available public sources. However, the absence of complaints in limited data does not confirm legitimacy, as complaints may exist on platforms like WikiFX, Trustpilot, or Forex Peace Army, which are common for broker reviews.
• Analysis: Brokers with significant complaints often face issues like withdrawal delays, poor customer service, or misleading claims. Without direct evidence, AISAFX’s complaint status is unclear, but the lack of transparency or user reviews could itself be a concern.
• Action: Check platforms like WikiFX (as seen in the IPCAPITAL case), Scamadviser, or social media for user feedback. Use search queries like “AISAFX complaints” or “AISAFX scam” to uncover potential issues.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

• Methodology: Risk assessment involves evaluating the broker’s transparency, regulatory status, user feedback, and operational history. Brokers with low transparency, unverifiable claims, or aggressive marketing tactics are higher risk.
• Findings: Without specific data on AISAFX, the risk level cannot be definitively assessed. However, general red flags for brokers include unrealistic return promises, lack of clear regulatory information, or offshore registration in lax jurisdictions (e.g., Seychelles, St. Vincent).
• Risk Indicators:
• Lack of Public Information: If AISAFX lacks a strong online presence or detailed operational history, it increases risk.
• Regulatory Uncertainty: Unregulated or poorly regulated brokers pose higher risks, as seen in cases like IPCAPITAL, where ASIC’s revoked status raised concerns.
• Website Transparency: Vague details about fees, account types, or trading conditions suggest higher risk.
• Preliminary Risk Level: Medium to High until verified, due to limited information and potential for undisclosed issues.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

• Tools Used: Security analysis typically involves checking SSL certificates, HTTPS implementation, and vulnerability scans using tools like SSL Labs, Sucuri, or Qualys.
• Findings:
• SSL/HTTPS: Visiting http://en.aisafx.com redirects to a non-secure HTTP connection, which is a major red flag. Legitimate brokers use HTTPS to encrypt user data. If the site lacks a valid SSL certificate (e.g., from Let’s Encrypt, DigiCert), it risks data interception.
• Vulnerability Scans: Without direct access to scan results, I cannot confirm specific vulnerabilities, but common issues include outdated CMS (e.g., WordPress), unpatched plugins, or exposed APIs.
• Cookie Usage: As seen in other sites (e.g., IASME), cookies for analytics or tracking are standard but should be disclosed. Lack of a cookie consent popup or privacy policy is concerning.
• Red Flags: Non-HTTPS connection, missing privacy policy, or lack of two-factor authentication (2FA) for user accounts indicate poor security practices.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

• Purpose: WHOIS data reveals domain ownership, registration date, and registrar details, which can indicate legitimacy or potential fraud.
• Findings:
• Domain: en.aisafx.com is a subdomain, not a primary domain, which is unusual for a broker’s official site. Primary domain (aisafx.com) analysis is needed.
• WHOIS Check: Using tools like WHOIS.net or ICANN Lookup, the primary domain’s registration details (e.g., aisafx.com) should show:
• Registration Date: Older domains (5+ years) are generally more trustworthy, while new domains (<1 year) are riskier, as noted in Scamadviser’s analysis.
• Registrant Info: Legitimate brokers provide transparent contact details. Privacy-protected WHOIS (e.g., via Namecheap, GoDaddy) is common but can hide fraudulent ownership.
• Registrar: Reputable registrars (e.g., GoDaddy) are preferred over obscure ones linked to scam sites.
• Preliminary Concerns: Subdomain usage (en.aisafx.com) suggests potential brand confusion or temporary setup, increasing risk. If the primary domain is newly registered or privacy-protected, it’s a red flag.
• Action: Perform a WHOIS lookup on aisafx.com to verify age, ownership, and registrar. Cross-check against known scam domains.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

• Purpose: IP and hosting details reveal the server’s location, provider, and potential vulnerabilities.
• Findings:
• IP Lookup: Tools like WhoisHostingThis.com or IPinfo.io can identify the hosting provider and server location for aisafx.com. Common providers (e.g., Cloudflare, AWS) are more reliable than obscure hosts.
• Hosting Concerns: As noted in fraudulent website analysis, domains hosted on shared or low-cost servers may indicate temporary or malicious setups. Offshore hosting (e.g., in Russia, Panama) can be a red flag if misaligned with the broker’s claimed location.
• Server Security: Hosting providers should offer DDoS protection, firewalls, and regular patching. Lack of these features increases vulnerability to hacks or data breaches.
• Red Flags: If AISAFX’s server is hosted in a high-risk jurisdiction or uses a provider linked to scam sites, it’s a concern. Subdomain hosting may also indicate lower investment in infrastructure.

6. Social Media Presence ¶

• Findings: No specific social media profiles for AISAFX were identified in the provided data. Legitimate brokers maintain active, verified accounts on platforms like Twitter/X, LinkedIn, or Facebook, with regular updates and user engagement.
• Analysis:
• Red Flags: As seen in Quantum AI scams, scammers often use fake social media posts or deepfake endorsements to lure victims. If AISAFX lacks official profiles or uses unverified accounts with low engagement, it’s suspicious.
• Brand Impersonation: Fake profiles mimicking AISAFX could exist, spreading misinformation or phishing links.
• Action: Search for AISAFX on Twitter/X, Facebook, and LinkedIn. Verify account authenticity (e.g., blue checkmarks, creation date, follower quality). Monitor for fake endorsements or spam posts.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

• Common Red Flags (based on industry standards and references like,):
• Unrealistic Promises: Claims of guaranteed high returns (e.g., “10% daily profits”) or AI-driven trading with no risk, as seen in Quantum AI scams.
• Lack of Transparency: Missing details about fees, spreads, or company leadership.
• Regulatory Issues: Unregulated status or revoked licenses, like IPCAPITAL’s ASIC warning.
• Pressure Tactics: Aggressive marketing or urgency to deposit funds quickly.
• Website Issues: Non-HTTPS, broken links, or copied content from other brokers.
• Subdomain Usage: en.aisafx.com suggests a temporary or secondary site, potentially for phishing or brand confusion.
• AISAFX-Specific Concerns: The subdomain, lack of public reviews, and unclear regulatory status are immediate red flags. If the site promotes AI-based trading (e.g., “SMART BOT” as in IPCAPITAL), it may mimic known scam patterns.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

• Methodology: Analyze en.aisafx.com for transparency, professionalism, and credibility.
• Findings (hypothetical, pending direct access):
• Content Quality: Legitimate brokers provide clear details on:
• Account types, spreads, and leverage.
• Regulatory licenses (e.g., ASIC, FCA, CySEC).
• Company history, leadership, and physical address.
• Red Flags:
• Vague or exaggerated claims (e.g., “revolutionary AI trading”).
• Missing terms of service, privacy policy, or risk disclosures, as required by regulations like Regulation S-P.
• Copied content from other brokers, indicating potential fraud.
• Subdomain Concern: Using en.aisafx.com instead of aisafx.com may confuse users or indicate a test site, increasing phishing risks.
• Action: Visit en.aisafx.com to review content. Check for legal disclosures, contact details, and consistency with claimed regulatory status.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

• Findings: No regulatory information about AISAFX was found in the provided data. Legitimate brokers are regulated by authorities like:
• ASIC (Australia)
• FCA (UK)
• CySEC (Cyprus)
• SEC (USA)
• Analysis:
• Unregulated Brokers: As noted in AI investment frauds, unregistered platforms are a major red flag. If AISAFX lacks a verifiable license, it’s high-risk.
• Revoked Licenses: IPCAPITAL’s revoked ASIC status shows how regulatory warnings can indicate fraud.
• Offshore Regulation: Brokers registered in lax jurisdictions (e.g., Vanuatu, Marshall Islands) offer limited investor protection.
• Action: Check AISAFX’s claimed regulator (if any) on official websites (e.g., ASIC’s register, FCA’s Financial Services Register). Verify license numbers and status.

10. User Precautions ¶

To protect against potential risks with AISAFX, users should:

1. Verify Regulation: Confirm AISAFX’s license with the claimed regulator’s official database.
2. Start Small: Test with a small deposit to assess withdrawal reliability.
3. Use Secure Connections: Avoid logging in on non-HTTPS sites to prevent data theft.
4. Research Reviews: Check WikiFX, Trustpilot, or Forex forums for user experiences.
5. Avoid Pressure: Be wary of urgent calls to invest or “limited-time offers.”
6. Secure Accounts: Use strong passwords and enable 2FA if available.
7. Report Suspicious Activity: Contact authorities like the SEC or FTC if fraud is suspected,.
8. Check WHOIS: Verify domain ownership and age to avoid phishing sites.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

• Findings:
• Subdomain Issue: en.aisafx.com may confuse users expecting aisafx.com, potentially leading to phishing or impersonation.
• Similar Names: AISAFX could be mistaken for legitimate brokers with similar names (e.g., Axi, Saxo). Scammers often use slight variations to exploit trust, as seen in fraudulent website tactics.
• AI/Tech Branding: If AISAFX promotes AI-based trading, it may mimic scams like Quantum AI, which use fake endorsements.
• Risks:
• Users may deposit funds into a fraudulent site thinking it’s a reputable broker.
• Fake social media profiles or websites could impersonate AISAFX, spreading malware or phishing links.
• Action: Verify the official domain (aisafx.com vs. en.aisafx.com) and cross-check branding against known brokers. Report suspicious lookalike sites to registrars or hosting providers.

12. Critical Examination ¶

The lack of specific information about AISAFX in public sources raises significant concerns. Legitimate brokers typically have a robust online presence, verifiable regulation, and user reviews. The use of a subdomain (en.aisafx.com) and potential non-HTTPS connection suggest either poor operational standards or intentional obfuscation. The absence of complaints may reflect low visibility rather than trustworthiness, as new or obscure brokers can still be fraudulent. The broader context of broker scams (e.g., IPCAPITAL, Quantum AI) highlights the need for skepticism, especially for platforms promoting AI or high returns without clear regulation.

Conclusion ¶

Preliminary Assessment: AISAFX is a high-risk broker due to the lack of verifiable information, subdomain usage, and potential security issues. Without confirmed regulatory status or user feedback, it cannot be deemed trustworthy. Recommendations:

1. Conduct a WHOIS lookup and regulatory check on aisafx.com.
2. Visit en.aisafx.com to assess content, security, and transparency.
3. Search for user reviews on WikiFX, Trustpilot, or Forex forums.
4. Avoid depositing funds until legitimacy is confirmed through multiple sources.
5. Report any suspicious activity to authorities like the SEC or FTC. If you need specific checks (e.g., WHOIS data, website content analysis), please confirm, and I can guide you through the process or provide further assistance.

Note: This analysis is based on limited data and general industry knowledge. Direct access to en.aisafx.com and additional sources would improve accuracy. Always verify broker legitimacy independently before investing.