Below is a comprehensive analysis of Intrade Bar (Intrade.bar LTD), a binary options broker, based on online complaint information, risk level assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, potential brand confusion, and website content analysis. The analysis draws from available web sources, critical evaluation of the information, and general knowledge about online trading platforms.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

Online reviews and complaints about Intrade Bar present a mixed picture, with significant concerns raised by users and reviewers:

Negative Complaints:
Account Blocking and Withdrawal Issues: Multiple sources report that Intrade Bar has blocked user accounts, particularly when users attempt to withdraw funds. Complaints include accounts being shut down after withdrawal requests, with some users alleging their funds were not returned.
Technical Problems: Users have reported technical issues such as delays in trade execution (up to 5-6 seconds) and discrepancies in trade pricing, where trades are executed at different prices than intended. These issues are perceived by some as deliberate attempts to manipulate outcomes.
Verification Problems: Some users claim that Intrade Bar demands repeated verification processes that are difficult or impossible to complete, potentially as a tactic to delay or prevent withdrawals.
Poor Customer Support: Complaints include unresponsive or rude customer support, with limited availability (e.g., inaccessible after 17:00 Moscow time or on weekends).
Positive Feedback:
Some reviews praise Intrade Bar for fast withdrawals (5-15 minutes in most cases) and a user-friendly platform with features like risk management tools and demo accounts.
Positive reviews highlight the absence of aggressive marketing tactics (e.g., no unsolicited calls) and transparent quotes from FXCM, a reputable liquidity provider.
Critical Observation: The stark contrast between positive and negative reviews suggests potential manipulation of reviews or selective experiences. Positive reviews often come from sources affiliated with the broker (e.g., Revieweek), while negative reviews appear on independent platforms like Valforex and Otzovik. This discrepancy raises concerns about the authenticity of positive feedback.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

Intrade Bar is considered a moderate to high-risk broker based on the following factors:

Lack of Regulation: Intrade Bar is not regulated by any recognized financial authority, which increases the risk of fund mismanagement or fraud.
Offshore Registration: The broker is registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a jurisdiction known for lax regulatory oversight, which is a common choice for brokers seeking to avoid strict compliance requirements.
Binary Options Market: Binary options trading is inherently high-risk due to its all-or-nothing nature and has been banned in several jurisdictions (e.g., the EU by ESMA in 2018). Intrade Bar’s focus on binary options amplifies the risk for traders.
User Complaints: Reports of account blocking, withdrawal issues, and technical manipulations indicate operational risks that could lead to financial losses.
Limited Transparency: The broker’s website lacks comprehensive information about trading conditions, fees, and analytical tools, which can hinder informed decision-making. Risk Level Conclusion: High risk, primarily due to lack of regulation, offshore status, and serious user complaints about withdrawals and account management.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

An analysis of Intrade Bar’s website security reveals the following:

SSL Certificate: As of November 2019, Intrade Bar had an expired SSL certificate issued by Let’s Encrypt, which expired on January 21, 2020. An expired SSL certificate compromises data encryption, increasing the risk of data interception. Recent checks (as of April 2025) are unavailable, but this history raises concerns about ongoing security maintenance.
Google Safe Browsing: According to Webrate, Intrade Bar is deemed a safe domain by Google Safe Browsing and Symantec, indicating no immediate malware or phishing threats.
Mobile Optimization: The website is not well-optimized for mobile devices, which may affect user experience and security on mobile platforms.
General Security Practices: While the broker claims to use secure payment methods (e.g., credit cards, Skrill), the lack of regulation and reports of withdrawal issues suggest that funds may not be as secure as advertised. Security Conclusion: Moderate security concerns due to a history of expired SSL certificates and lack of mobile optimization. Traders should verify the current SSL status before entering sensitive information.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

The WHOIS data for Intrade.bar provides insight into its ownership and registration:

Domain Name: intrade.bar
Registrar: Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU, LLC
Registration Date: August 19, 2016
Expiry Date: August 19, 2023 (likely renewed, as the website remains active in 2025)
Registrant Country: Russia
Registrant Organization: Privacy Protection (obscuring detailed ownership information)
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited, renewPeriod Analysis:
The use of privacy protection to hide registrant details is common but can be a red flag for brokers, as it reduces transparency and accountability.
The Russian registrant country aligns with Intrade Bar’s initial targeting of CIS markets, but its registration in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines creates jurisdictional ambiguity.
The domain’s long registration history (since 2016) suggests some operational stability, but it does not guarantee legitimacy. WHOIS Conclusion: Limited transparency due to privacy protection and jurisdictional discrepancies between domain registration (Russia) and company registration (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines).

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

Hosting details provide additional context about Intrade Bar’s infrastructure:

Hosting Provider: DANCOM LTD, Belize
IP Address: Associated with DANCOM LTD’s IP ranges (e.g., 186.2.160/20, 190.115.16/20).
Server Location: Belize, with contacts linked to Evgeniy Marchenko (Russia) and Huan Nadas (Ecuador).
Other Websites: DANCOM LTD hosts other websites, but no specific information links Intrade Bar to known scam networks. Analysis:
Hosting in Belize, like the company’s registration in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, aligns with offshore jurisdictions that offer minimal regulatory oversight.
The lack of resolved IP address in recent checks (September 2023) suggests potential downtime or configuration issues, which could affect platform reliability.
The involvement of individuals from multiple countries (Russia, Ecuador) in hosting contacts adds complexity and reduces transparency. Hosting Conclusion: Offshore hosting in Belize raises concerns about oversight and reliability, consistent with the broker’s high-risk profile.

Intrade Bar’s social media presence is limited and not well-documented in the provided sources:

Official Channels: The website (intrade.bar) does not prominently feature social media links, and no major platforms (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, Telegram) are explicitly mentioned in reviews or analyses.
User Discussions: Social media discussions about Intrade Bar are sparse, with most user feedback appearing on review platforms like Trustpilot, Otzovik, and Valforex rather than social media.
Red Flags: The absence of a strong social media presence can indicate limited engagement with the trading community or an attempt to avoid scrutiny. Legitimate brokers often maintain active social media accounts to build trust and communicate updates. Social Media Conclusion: Minimal social media presence is a potential red flag, as it limits transparency and community engagement.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Several red flags and risk indicators emerge from the analysis:

Unregulated Status: Intrade Bar lacks a license from any recognized financial authority, increasing the risk of fraud or mismanagement.
Offshore Registration: The Saint Vincent and the Grenadines registration is a common tactic among high-risk brokers to evade strict regulations.
Account Blocking: Reports of accounts being blocked after withdrawal requests suggest potential scam tactics.
Misleading Claims: Intrade Bar has been accused of making unrealistic promises, such as 84% win rates in under a minute, which are not feasible in legitimate trading.
Weekend Trading Claims: Offering trading during weekends, when financial markets are closed, is a deceptive claim that questions the broker’s credibility.
Lack of Analytical Tools: The absence of robust analytical resources (e.g., economic calendars, market news) limits traders’ ability to make informed decisions.
Verification and Withdrawal Issues: Repeated verification demands and withdrawal delays are common scam tactics reported by users.
Ownership Discrepancies: Claims of being owned by “Mr. Axiano LP” (a Scottish company) are false, as no such registration exists, indicating potential deception. Red Flags Conclusion: Multiple serious red flags, including lack of regulation, offshore status, and deceptive practices, strongly suggest caution.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

The Intrade Bar website (https://intrade.bar/) promotes itself as a “transparent binary options broker” with the following features:

Key Claims:
Fast withdrawals (5-15 minutes, up to 60 minutes).
No account blocking, with a claim of paying out all withdrawal requests.
Accurate quotes from FXCM, a reputable liquidity provider.
Risk management tools to set maximum profit/loss limits.
Demo account with $10,000 virtual funds for practice.
No bonuses or aggressive marketing tactics.
TradingView integration for charts and technical analysis.
Content Gaps:
Limited information on fees, with some sources noting a 2.5-3% withdrawal fee if trading turnover exceeds 149% of the deposit.
No educational resources or advanced analytical tools (e.g., economic calendars, trading signals).
Website primarily in Russian, limiting accessibility for non-Russian speakers.
Sparse details on company ownership, regulatory status, or legal documents beyond basic policies (e.g., Client Agreement, Privacy Policy).
Critical Evaluation:
The emphasis on “transparency” and “no account blocking” contradicts user complaints about blocked accounts and withdrawal issues, suggesting deceptive marketing.
The lack of educational and analytical tools is a significant drawback for a broker targeting both beginners and professionals.
The website’s focus on Russian-speaking users may limit its appeal and accessibility, potentially alienating international traders. Content Conclusion: The website presents a polished image of transparency and user-friendliness, but user complaints and missing regulatory details undermine its credibility.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

Intrade Bar’s regulatory status is a major concern:

No Regulation: Intrade Bar is not licensed by any recognized financial authority, such as the FCA, CySEC, ASIC, or others.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: The broker is registered in this offshore jurisdiction, which does not regulate binary options brokers, leaving traders without recourse in disputes.
EU Ban on Binary Options: Binary options trading was banned in the EU by ESMA in 2018, and Intrade Bar’s claim of operating legally in the UK post-Brexit is false, as the UK also prohibits binary options.
False Ownership Claims: The alleged parent company, Mr. Axiano LP, is not registered in Scotland or elsewhere, further eroding trust. Regulatory Conclusion: Intrade Bar operates without regulatory oversight, posing significant risks to traders, especially given the binary options ban in major jurisdictions.

10. User Precautions ¶

To mitigate risks when considering Intrade Bar, users should take the following precautions:

Due Diligence:
Verify the broker’s regulatory status independently. Avoid unregulated brokers like Intrade Bar unless you are willing to accept high risks.
Research user reviews on independent platforms (e.g., Trustpilot, Valforex, Otzovik) rather than relying on the broker’s website or affiliated review sites.
Financial Precautions:
Start with the minimum deposit ($10) to test the platform without risking significant funds.
Attempt a small withdrawal early to confirm the broker’s reliability. Be wary of delays or unexpected fees.
Avoid using payment methods that cannot be reversed (e.g., wire transfers, cryptocurrencies). Use credit cards or services like PayPal for chargeback options.
Security Measures:
Ensure the website has a valid SSL certificate before entering personal or financial information. Check the browser’s padlock icon and certificate details.
Use strong, unique passwords and enable two-factor authentication (if available) to secure your account.
Trading Precautions:
Use the demo account to test strategies and platform functionality without risking real money.
Be cautious of unrealistic promises (e.g., 84% win rates in minutes) and avoid trading during weekends, as markets are closed.
Set strict risk management limits to control losses, leveraging Intrade Bar’s risk management tools if they function as advertised.
Dispute Resolution:
Document all interactions with the broker, including emails, chat logs, and transaction records, for evidence in case of disputes.
If funds are lost, contact your bank or payment provider immediately to file a chargeback. Services like MyChargeBack may assist with recovery. Precautions Conclusion: Traders must exercise extreme caution with Intrade Bar, starting with minimal investment, verifying withdrawal processes, and preparing for potential disputes due to the lack of regulation.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

Intrade Bar’s branding and domain may cause confusion with other entities:

Similar Domains:
intrade2.bar: Identified as a competitor or related site, potentially causing confusion among users.
intrad.fr: Another similar site ranked as a competitor, which may mislead users searching for Intrade Bar.
intradebar.net: Appears to be a separate site discussing Intrade Bar, which could be mistaken for the official website.
Misleading Claims:
Intrade Bar’s claim of being a Scottish company (via Mr. Axiano LP) may confuse users into believing it is regulated or based in the UK, which is false.
The broker’s emphasis on “transparency” and “no account blocking” may mislead users, given contradictory user experiences.
Generic Name: The name “Intrade” is generic and could be confused with other trading platforms or brokers, especially in the binary options or forex space. Users should verify the exact domain (intrade.bar) to avoid phishing or clone sites. Brand Confusion Conclusion: The presence of similar domains and false claims about ownership increases the risk of brand confusion, requiring users to verify the official website carefully.

12. Overall Conclusion ¶

Intrade Bar (https://intrade.bar/) is a high-risk binary options broker with significant red flags that outweigh its advertised benefits. Key findings include:

High Risk: The lack of regulation, offshore registration in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and serious user complaints about account blocking and withdrawal issues indicate a high likelihood of financial loss.
Red Flags: False ownership claims, unrealistic profit promises, weekend trading offers, and technical/verification issues suggest potential scam tactics.
Security Concerns: A history of expired SSL certificates and offshore hosting raise questions about data and fund security.
Limited Transparency: The website lacks comprehensive information, and the use of privacy protection in WHOIS data obscures ownership.
User Precautions: Traders should approach with extreme caution, starting with minimal deposits, testing withdrawals, and preparing for potential disputes.
Brand Confusion: Similar domains and misleading claims increase the risk of user error or deception. Recommendation: Avoid trading with Intrade Bar unless you are an experienced trader willing to accept significant risks. Instead, consider regulated brokers licensed by reputable authorities (e.g., FCA, CySEC, ASIC) to ensure fund safety and recourse in disputes. If you choose to proceed, follow strict precautions, including using the demo account, verifying withdrawals, and documenting all interactions. Sources: This analysis is based on web sources provided, including reviews from Scamadviser, Trustpilot, WikiFX, Valforex, Traders Union, and others, as well as general knowledge of binary options trading risks. If you have further questions or need assistance with specific aspects of Intrade Bar, please let me know!

AI risk analysis - INTRADE BAR (2025-04-29 17:35:30)