Below is a comprehensive analysis of SkyFx.com based on the available information, focusing on the requested aspects such as online complaints, risk level, regulatory status, and potential red flags, while noting the possibility that SkyFx.com may be a shell company. Since no direct website information is provided, I rely on the provided search results, external data, and logical inference, critically evaluating the information to avoid blindly accepting any narrative. I aim to be concise yet thorough, addressing each requested area.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

SkyFx.com has significant negative feedback and complaints across multiple platforms, indicating serious issues with its operations:

• Forex Peace Army (2015-2016): Multiple complaints label SkyFx as a scam. Users reported issues such as unauthorized trading by account managers, refusal to process withdrawals, and demands for additional deposits to “unlock” funds. For example, one user claimed a manager insisted on a $10,000 deposit to avoid account freezing, then refused a $11,700 withdrawal. Another user reported losing $2,890 due to aggressive trading by a broker named Fred Malcovich, who ignored low-risk instructions.
• BrokersView (2023-2025): Users described SkyFx as a scam, citing experiences where funds were not returned, and support was unresponsive. One user invested $1,005, was told they made a profit, but was then asked for a $2,500 commission fee, which they couldn’t pay, resulting in loss of funds.
• TradersUnion (2025): Complaints include frozen withdrawal requests, canceled profits under vague rule violations, and a Ponzi scheme orchestrated by SkyFx. One user lost $3,000 after being pressured to deposit more to “activate” withdrawals, and another reported $6,000 in managed accounts becoming inaccessible.
• ComplaintsBoard (2024): SkyFx received a 1.0-star rating from two reviews, with users calling it a scam. One user lost $20,000 and only recovered 80% through a Cyprus Ombudsman complaint, indicating severe issues with fund security.
• ForexBrokerz (2019): A user reported losing $192,000, describing SkyFx as a “big burglar” for not releasing funds. Another user lost $1,005 after being misled by a social media influencer. Summary: Complaints consistently highlight non-payment of withdrawals, unauthorized trading, high-pressure tactics, and unresponsive support, painting SkyFx as highly untrustworthy.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

SkyFx.com presents a high-risk profile based on the following factors:

• Regulatory Issues: SkyFx claims regulation by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Mauritius, but checks confirm it is not regulated by FSC or any other recognized authority (e.g., CySEC, FCA, ASIC). Its CySEC license was revoked in 2016, and it continued operating illegally. Unregulated brokers pose significant risks as funds lack legal protection.
• Financial Losses: Users report losses ranging from $1,005 to $192,000, often due to frozen accounts or canceled withdrawals. The pattern of demanding additional deposits to access funds is a classic scam tactic.
• Operational History: SkyFx, founded in 2011 and based in Cyprus, initially operated without major complaints but deteriorated after 2014, culminating in its license revocation and closure around 2017. Reports of a Ponzi scheme linked to Aviv Talmor in 2016 further elevate risk.
• Lack of Transparency: The website (skyfx.com) is reportedly non-functional or inaccessible, a red flag for a shell company. Lack of verifiable contact details or operational transparency increases risk. Risk Level: High. Investors face a substantial likelihood of financial loss with limited recourse due to the lack of regulation and history of fraudulent behavior.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

Since the SkyFx.com website is reportedly non-functional or inaccessible, a direct analysis of website security (e.g., SSL certificates, encryption, or vulnerabilities) is not possible. However, the following inferences can be made:

• Inaccessible Website: A non-working website (noted at skyfx.co.uk or skyfx.com) is a major red flag, suggesting the company may be defunct, a shell entity, or deliberately avoiding scrutiny. Legitimate brokers maintain active, secure websites.
• Historical Context: When operational, SkyFx’s website likely lacked robust security, as complaints mention poor platform functionality and unprofessional management (e.g., “nightmare” dashboard management).
• Recommendations for Analysis: If the website were active, tools like SSL Labs, Sucuri, or Qualys could assess HTTPS implementation, while UpGuard could evaluate external attack surfaces. Given the current status, these tools are inapplicable, but the absence of a website itself indicates negligible security. Summary: The non-functional website precludes security analysis but strongly suggests SkyFx is either defunct or a shell company, aligning with high-risk indicators.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

No specific WHOIS data is provided for SkyFx.com, and the website’s inaccessibility prevents real-time lookup. However, based on historical information:

• Registered Entity: SkyFx is owned by Trademarker Ltd., registered in Cyprus with a CySEC license (151/11) until its revocation in 2016.
• Alternative Domain: WikiFX mentions a related domain, skyfx.co.uk, registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, with an address at 2-4 Great Eastern St, Hackney, London EC2A 3NW, UK. This address is dubious, as Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is a known offshore haven with lax regulation, and the London address may be a virtual office, common for shell companies.
• WHOIS Red Flags: If WHOIS data shows privacy protection, recent domain creation, or frequent registrar changes, these would indicate potential shell company behavior. Without current data, the historical link to Trademarker and an offshore registration suggests a high likelihood of being a shell entity. Summary: The lack of current WHOIS data and offshore registration history support the hypothesis that SkyFx.com may be a shell company designed to obscure ownership and operations.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

Without an active website or IP address, direct IP and hosting analysis is not feasible. However, inferences from available data include:

• Historical Hosting: When active, SkyFx.com was likely hosted on standard commercial servers, but no specific hosting provider is mentioned. Complaints about platform instability (e.g., excessive spreads, frozen withdrawals) suggest poor infrastructure, possibly hosted on low-cost or unreliable servers.
• Shell Company Implications: Shell companies often use shared hosting or virtual servers in jurisdictions with minimal oversight (e.g., Saint Vincent and the Grenadines). The non-functional website suggests SkyFx may have abandoned its hosting or operates minimally to avoid detection.
• Potential Analysis: If the website were active, tools like WHOIS.domaintools.com or SecurityTrails could identify the hosting provider, IP geolocation, and server history. A hosting location in an offshore jurisdiction or frequent IP changes would be red flags. Summary: The absence of hosting data due to an inactive website reinforces the shell company hypothesis, as legitimate brokers maintain stable, transparent hosting.

6. Social Media Analysis ¶

There is limited information on SkyFx’s social media presence, but available data suggests problematic activity:

• Instagram Scams: A user reported being approached via Instagram by a “public figure” promoting SkyFx, leading to a $1,005 loss. This indicates SkyFx or its affiliates used social media for fraudulent outreach, leveraging influencers to target victims.
• Lack of Official Presence: No verified SkyFx social media accounts (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn) are mentioned, which is unusual for a legitimate broker. Legitimate firms maintain active, professional social media profiles for customer engagement.
• Red Flags: The use of unsolicited messages or fake profiles on social media to lure investors is a common scam tactic. The absence of a visible, professional social media footprint further suggests SkyFx is either defunct or operating covertly as a shell entity. Summary: SkyFx’s social media activity appears limited to fraudulent outreach via platforms like Instagram, with no evidence of a legitimate presence, aligning with scam behavior.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Numerous red flags and risk indicators emerge from the analysis:

• Unregulated Status: Lack of valid regulation, with a revoked CySEC license and false claims of FSC Mauritius oversight.
• Non-Functional Website: An inaccessible website suggests the company is defunct or deliberately hiding operations.
• High-Pressure Tactics: Demands for additional deposits to “unlock” withdrawals or activate accounts are classic scam indicators.
• Ponzi Scheme Allegations: Reports link SkyFx to a Ponzi scheme, using new investors’ funds to pay earlier ones, a severe risk indicator.
• Unresponsive Support: Multiple users report ignored withdrawal requests and lack of customer support, indicating intentional fund retention.
• Offshore Registration: Ties to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a jurisdiction with minimal regulatory oversight, suggest a shell company setup.
• Historical Fraud: Association with Trademarker Ltd., which faced multiple scam allegations and FPA guilty votes, increases risk.
• Aggressive Trading: Brokers executing unauthorized, high-risk trades (e.g., Fred Malcovich’s actions) led to significant user losses. Summary: The cumulative red flags—unregulated status, non-functional website, scam tactics, and offshore ties—strongly indicate SkyFx is a high-risk entity, likely a shell company.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

With no active website, content analysis is based on historical descriptions and user reports:

• Historical Content: SkyFx.com offered trading in forex, indices, commodities, and metals, with platforms like MetaTrader 4 and ZuluTrade. It claimed features like daily market analysis, a pip calculator, and a $50,000 demo account. These are standard for brokers but lack verification.
• Misleading Claims: The website falsely claimed FSC Mauritius regulation and displayed a revoked CySEC license, misleading users about its legitimacy.
• User Experience: Complaints describe a poorly managed dashboard, excessive fees, and platform instability (e.g., high spreads), suggesting unprofessional content and functionality.
• Shell Company Indicators: The current non-functional website suggests SkyFx may exist only as a registered entity with no operational substance, a hallmark of shell companies used for fraud or money laundering. Summary: Historical website content was typical of forex brokers but included false regulatory claims. The current lack of an active site strongly supports the shell company hypothesis.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

SkyFx’s regulatory status is a critical concern:

• Claimed Regulation: SkyFx claimed to be regulated by the FSC of Mauritius and previously held a CySEC license (151/11).
• Actual Status:
• FSC Mauritius: Verification shows SkyFx is not regulated by FSC, rendering its claim false.
• CySEC: The license was suspended in February 2016 and revoked in May 2016 due to non-compliance. CySEC ordered SkyFx to return client funds, but complaints indicate non-compliance.
• Other Regulators: No evidence of registration with major regulators like FCA, ASIC, CFTC, or NFA.
• Implications: Operating without regulation after 2016 makes SkyFx illegal in jurisdictions requiring licensing. Investors have no legal recourse, and funds are unprotected. Summary: SkyFx is unregulated, with a history of false regulatory claims and a revoked CySEC license, confirming its high-risk, potentially fraudulent status.

10. User Precautions ¶

To protect against risks associated with SkyFx.com or similar brokers, users should:

• Verify Regulation: Check broker licenses with authorities like CySEC, FCA, or ASIC using official registries. Avoid unregulated brokers like SkyFx.
• Research Complaints: Review platforms like Forex Peace Army, BrokersView, or ComplaintsBoard for user experiences. SkyFx’s negative reviews highlight scam risks “‘web:1⁊
• Avoid High-Pressure Tactics: Be wary of demands for additional deposits or urgent investment decisions, as seen with SkyFx.
• Test Withdrawals: Deposit small amounts initially and test withdrawals to ensure funds can be accessed. SkyFx’s withdrawal issues are a red flag.
• Use Secure Platforms: Choose brokers with active, SSL-secured websites and transparent contact details. SkyFx’s non-functional site is a warning sign.
• Report Scams: If scammed, report to regulators (e.g., CySEC, SEC) or services like MyChargeBack. One user recovered 80% via a Cyprus Ombudsman complaint.
• Consult Experts: Seek advice from financial advisors before investing, especially with high-risk platforms like SkyFx. Summary: Users must prioritize due diligence, avoid unregulated brokers, and act swiftly if scammed to mitigate risks posed by entities like SkyFx.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

SkyFx.com may be confused with other entities, increasing scam risks:

• Similar Names:
• Sky Trading Fx: Another unregulated broker flagged as a scam by the UK FCA in 2023, falsely claiming a U.S. license. Confusion with SkyFx is possible due to similar naming.
• SkyBridge Finance: A 2024 forex broker with no licensing, also flagged as a scam. Its Australian address is unverified, and the name resembles SkyFx.
• Sky Broking: A legitimate Indian stockbroker regulated by SEBI, unrelated to forex. Its name could be mistaken for SkyFx, especially in search results.
• Sky-Markets: An unregulated forex platform with complaints about high spreads and limited resources, potentially confused with SkyFx due to naming.
• Shell Company Tactics: Scammers often use similar names to exploit brand recognition or confuse users. SkyFx’s association with Trademarker Ltd. and its non-functional website suggest it may be part of a network of shell entities using similar branding.
• Social Media Risks: Fraudulent outreach on Instagram under SkyFx’s name could be mistaken for legitimate brokers, as seen with the $1,005 scam. Summary: SkyFx’s name similarity to other brokers, both legitimate and fraudulent, increases the risk of confusion, especially given its likely status as a shell company.

12. Shell Company Hypothesis ¶

The hypothesis that SkyFx.com is a shell company is strongly supported:

• Non-Functional Website: An inactive website (skyfx.com or skyfx.co.uk) suggests no operational substance, a common trait of shell companies.
• Offshore Registration: Ties to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a jurisdiction known for hosting shell entities, raise suspicions. The London address is likely a virtual office.
• Regulatory Evasion: Operating without a license post-2016 and false regulatory claims indicate intent to avoid oversight, typical of shell companies used for fraud.
• Ponzi Scheme Links: Allegations of a Ponzi scheme suggest SkyFx was a front to collect funds without legitimate operations.
• Historical Fraud: Association with Trademarker Ltd., which faced multiple scam allegations, supports the idea of a shell entity network.
• Minimal Transparency: Lack of verifiable contact details, social media presence, or operational records aligns with shell company behavior, where entities exist only on paper to facilitate scams or money laundering. Summary: SkyFx.com exhibits multiple characteristics of a shell company, likely created to perpetrate fraud and evade accountability.

13. Conclusion and Recommendations ¶

SkyFx.com is a high-risk entity with overwhelming evidence of fraudulent behavior, strongly supporting the hypothesis that it is a shell company. Key findings include:

• Scam Indicators: Numerous complaints about non-paid withdrawals, unauthorized trading, and high-pressure tactics, with losses up to $192,000.
• Unregulated Status: No valid regulation, with a revoked CySEC license and false FSC Mauritius claims.
• Shell Company Traits: Non-functional website, offshore registration, and lack of transparency suggest minimal operational substance.
• Brand Confusion: Similarity to other brokers increases scam risks. Recommendations:
• Avoid SkyFx: Do not invest with SkyFx.com or related entities due to its scam history and lack of regulation.
• Conduct Due Diligence: Verify any broker’s license, read reviews, and test withdrawals before committing significant funds.
• Report Issues: If affected, contact regulators or recovery services like MyChargeBack, and consider legal action via bodies like the Cyprus Ombudsman.
• Choose Regulated Brokers: Opt for brokers regulated by reputable authorities (e.g., FCA, ASIC, CySEC) with transparent operations and positive user feedback. Final Note: The analysis is based on available data as of April 23, 2025, and critically evaluated to avoid bias. If SkyFx.com’s website becomes active or new information emerges, further investigation using tools like WHOIS, SSL Labs, or UpGuard is recommended to reassess its status. For now, SkyFx.com should be approached with extreme caution, if not avoided entirely.

If you need further details or specific follow-up (e.g., checking a related domain or analyzing a similar broker), please let me know!