Below is a comprehensive analysis of Bebor Limited, a broker operating under the website https://www.beborfx.com, based on the requested criteria. The analysis covers online complaints, risk level assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting details, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. The information is derived from available web sources, critical evaluation, and general knowledge about assessing online brokers. Note that some details may be limited due to the lack of specific data or access to real-time tools for certain analyses.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

• Source Analysis (WikiFX Review): According to WikiFX, Bebor Limited has received significant complaints, which have negatively impacted its rating. Specific complaints include:
• Withdrawal Issues: Users reported difficulties withdrawing funds. For instance, one user mentioned making a profit but being told a fee and taxes were required, followed by their account being frozen with no response from the account manager. Another user reported being unable to withdraw $133,000 after a $50,000 investment, with no communication from their account manager.
• Lack of Responsiveness: Complaints highlight unresponsive customer service or account managers, which is a common issue with potentially problematic brokers.
• Trustpilot or Other Review Platforms: No specific reviews were found on Trustpilot for Bebor Limited or https://www.beborfx.com. However, a separate entity, “Be Brokers” (bebrokers.me), has a 4-star rating on Trustpilot with 21 reviews, but this appears to be a different company, possibly leading to brand confusion (see section on brand confusion below).
• Pattern of Complaints: The complaints on WikiFX suggest a pattern of issues related to fund withdrawals and poor customer service, which are red flags for potential scams or unregulated brokers. Assessment: The presence of multiple complaints about withdrawal issues and unresponsiveness indicates a high risk of financial loss or fraudulent behavior. These complaints align with common tactics used by scam brokers, such as freezing accounts or imposing unexpected fees.

---

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

• WikiFX Risk Indicators: WikiFX labels Bebor as having a “High potential risk” due to:
• Suspicious Regulatory License: The broker’s regulatory status is questionable (see Regulatory Status section).
• Suspicious Scope of Business: Bebor may be operating beyond its authorized scope.
• Suspicious Overrun: The broker may be exceeding its licensed permissions.
• United States Common Financial Service License Unauthorized: Bebor claims a U.S. license, but it is not authorized by relevant regulators.
• Leverage and Account Types: Bebor offers high leverage (up to 1:200 for MT Accounts and 1:100 for ECN Accounts) and various account types with high minimum deposits (e.g., $2,000 for Standard, $100,000 for ECN). High leverage increases financial risk, especially for retail investors, and high minimum deposits may deter cautious traders but attract those seeking high returns, a common tactic in scams.
• General Risk Warning: Bebor’s website includes a risk warning that margin trading in Forex, Precious Metals, and CFDs carries significant risks and may not be suitable for all investors. While this is standard, it does not mitigate the specific risks tied to their operations. Assessment: The combination of suspicious regulatory status, high leverage, high minimum deposits, and multiple complaints results in a high-risk rating. Investors should approach with extreme caution.

---

3. Website Security Tools ¶

• HTTPS and Encryption: The website https://www.beborfx.com uses HTTPS, indicating a secure connection with SSL/TLS encryption. This is a basic security feature and does not necessarily indicate legitimacy, as many scam websites also use HTTPS.
• Security Software: There is no public information on whether Bebor employs additional security tools like firewalls, anti-phishing measures, or two-factor authentication (2FA) for user accounts. Legitimate brokers typically highlight such features to build trust.
• Potential Vulnerabilities: Without access to real-time security scanning tools (e.g., Sucuri, Qualys), it’s unclear if the site has vulnerabilities like outdated software, weak passwords, or malware. However, the lack of transparency about security practices is a concern.
• Clone Firm Risk: The website could be a target for or part of a clone firm scam, where fraudsters mimic legitimate brokers. Bebor’s questionable regulatory status increases this risk. Assessment: The presence of HTTPS is standard but insufficient to confirm robust security. The lack of disclosed security measures and the potential for clone firm scams suggest moderate to high security risks.

---

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

• Domain Information: The WHOIS data for https://www.beborfx.com is not publicly available in the provided sources. However, general practices for analyzing WHOIS data include checking:
• Registration Date: New domains (e.g., registered within the last 1-2 years) can be a red flag, as scam brokers often use fresh domains to avoid detection. For comparison, HeroFX’s domain was registered in July 2023, and its short history raised concerns.
• Registrant Privacy: Domains using privacy protection services (e.g., WhoisGuard) to hide registrant details are common among questionable brokers.
• Registrar: Reputable registrars (e.g., GoDaddy, Namecheap) are often used by both legitimate and scam sites, so this is less indicative.
• Inference: Without specific WHOIS data, we can infer that Bebor’s domain may exhibit red flags (e.g., recent registration or hidden registrant details) based on patterns seen in similar brokers like MBBO, which frequently changed domains to evade regulators. Assessment: The lack of transparent WHOIS data is a potential red flag. Investors should verify the domain’s age and registrant details using tools like WHOIS.net or ICANN Lookup before engaging.

---

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

• Hosting Details: No specific IP address or hosting provider details are provided for https://www.beborfx.com in the available sources. Typical analysis would involve:
• Hosting Provider: Reputable brokers use well-known hosting providers (e.g., AWS, Google Cloud, Cloudflare) with strong uptime and security. Scam brokers may use cheaper, less reliable hosts or providers in jurisdictions with lax regulations.
• IP Geolocation: The IP’s location should align with the broker’s claimed headquarters (Hong Kong, with a branch in London). Discrepancies (e.g., hosting in a high-risk jurisdiction) are red flags.
• Shared Hosting: If the IP is shared with multiple unrelated or suspicious sites, it could indicate a low-budget or scam operation.
• Inference: Similar brokers, like MBBO, use tactics like frequently changing domains and hiding physical addresses, suggesting potential hosting in jurisdictions that avoid scrutiny. Assessment: Without specific IP/hosting data, this remains inconclusive. Investors should use tools like SecurityTrails or VirusTotal to check the site’s hosting and IP reputation.

---

6. Social Media Presence ¶

• Presence: There is no mention of Bebor Limited’s official social media accounts (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, Instagram) in the provided sources or on the website content. For comparison, HeroFX is active on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, which is typical for brokers aiming to build trust.
• Engagement: Lack of social media presence or low engagement (e.g., few followers, minimal posts) can indicate a lack of transparency or a short operational history. Scam brokers often avoid social media to minimize scrutiny or because they frequently rebrand.
• Red Flags: The absence of verifiable social media accounts is concerning, as legitimate brokers typically maintain active profiles to engage with clients and share updates. Assessment: The apparent lack of social media presence is a red flag, suggesting limited transparency or a deliberate effort to avoid public scrutiny.

---

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Based on the analysis, several red flags and risk indicators emerge:

• Complaints About Withdrawals: Consistent reports of withdrawal issues and frozen accounts.
• Suspicious Regulatory Status: Claims of a U.S. license are unauthorized, and the broker’s overall regulatory status is questionable.
• High Leverage and Deposits: Offering up to 1:200 leverage and high minimum deposits ($2,000–$100,000) targets high-risk traders, a tactic used by scam brokers.
• Lack of Transparency: No WHOIS, IP, or social media details are readily available, reducing accountability.
• Potential Clone Firm: The broker’s questionable status and lack of verifiable details raise the risk of being a clone firm mimicking a legitimate entity.
• Short Operational History: While not confirmed, the pattern of complaints and lack of established presence suggest a relatively new operation, similar to MBBO’s recent domain changes.
• Unresponsive Customer Service: Complaints about uncommunicative account managers align with scam broker tactics. Assessment: Multiple red flags indicate a high likelihood of fraudulent or unreliable operations. The combination of withdrawal issues, lack of transparency, and suspicious regulatory claims is particularly concerning.

---

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

• Claims and Offerings:
• Bebor claims to provide “fully automated ECN matching” and a “one-stop online financial transactions service” with access to over 50 trading products (e.g., forex, stock indices, crude oil, precious metals).
• It offers MT4 and OREX platforms, customizable leverage up to 500:1, and account types like MT Account (Standard, Plus, Pro) and ECN Account.
• The website emphasizes deep liquidity, FIX API connections, and partnerships with top banks and non-bank liquidity providers.
• Bebor claims headquarters in Hong Kong with a branch in London, UK, and provides 5.5 days/week, 24-hour customer service.
• Tone and Promises: The content uses professional language and highlights “leading technical support,” “low latency,” and “customized trading solutions.” However, these claims are generic and lack verifiable evidence (e.g., no named liquidity providers or audited performance data).
• Risk Warnings: The site includes a standard risk warning about margin trading, which is legally required but does not address specific operational risks.
• Red Flags:
• Overly Ambitious Claims: Promises of “unimaginable low latency” and “highest quality investment opportunities” are vague and lack substantiation.
• Lack of Specifics: No details on key personnel, exact regulatory licenses, or audited financials.
• High Leverage Promotion: Offering up to 500:1 leverage is aggressive and risky, appealing to inexperienced traders prone to losses. Assessment: The website’s professional appearance and broad offerings are undermined by vague claims, lack of verifiable details, and aggressive marketing of high-risk features. This aligns with tactics used by questionable brokers to attract unsuspecting investors.

---

9. Regulatory Status ¶

• Claimed Status: Bebor claims to be headquartered in Hong Kong with a branch in London, UK, and mentions a U.S. Common Financial Service License.
• Verification:
• United States: WikiFX confirms the U.S. license is unauthorized, indicating Bebor is not regulated by bodies like the SEC or FINRA.
• Hong Kong: No evidence confirms registration with the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). For comparison, HeroFX’s lack of regulatory details with Saint Lucia’s FSRA raised concerns, and Bebor’s similar opacity suggests it is unregulated in Hong Kong.
• United Kingdom: No evidence of regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The claimed London branch is unverified, and legitimate UK brokers must be FCA-registered.
• Suspicious License: WikiFX notes a “Suspicious Regulatory License” and “Suspicious Scope of Business,” suggesting Bebor may be operating without proper authorization or exceeding its licensed activities.
• Clone Firm Risk: The lack of verifiable regulatory details increases the risk of Bebor being a clone firm, a common scam tactic where fraudsters mimic legitimate brokers. Assessment: Bebor Limited is likely unregulated, with an unauthorized U.S. license and no verifiable registration in Hong Kong or the UK. This is a critical red flag, as unregulated brokers pose significant risks of fraud and lack investor protections.

---

10. User Precautions ¶

To protect themselves, users considering Bebor Limited should take the following precautions:

1. Verify Regulation: Check Bebor’s regulatory status directly with reputable authorities (e.g., SEC, FCA, SFC) using tools like FINRA’s BrokerCheck or the FCA Register.
2. Research Complaints: Review platforms like WikiFX, Trustpilot, or BrokersView for user experiences. The withdrawal issues reported on WikiFX are a strong warning.
3. Test with Small Deposits: If engaging, start with a minimal deposit to test withdrawal processes before committing significant funds.
4. Use Secure Connections: Ensure all interactions with the website use HTTPS and avoid public Wi-Fi for transactions. Consider using a security token if offered.
5. Avoid High Leverage: Be cautious of Bebor’s high leverage offers (up to 500:1), as they amplify losses.
6. Check for Clone Firms: Verify Bebor’s credentials to ensure it’s not mimicking a legitimate broker. Contact the claimed regulators to confirm.
7. Monitor Social Media: Look for official social media accounts and assess their activity. The lack of presence is a red flag.
8. Consult Professionals: Seek advice from independent financial advisors before investing, especially given Bebor’s unregulated status.
9. Report Suspicious Activity: If issues arise, report to regulators (e.g., SEC at enforcement@sec.gov, FBI’s IC3 at www.ic3.gov) or platforms like WikiFX (report@wikifx.com). Assessment: Users must exercise extreme caution, prioritizing regulatory verification and small-scale testing to minimize financial risk.

---

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

• Be Brokers (bebrokers.me): A separate entity, Be Brokers, has a 4-star rating on Trustpilot and offers forex CRM and liquidity trading solutions, primarily in Cyprus. The similar name (“Bebor” vs. “Be Brokers”) could cause confusion, especially since Be Brokers appears more established and positively reviewed.
• Poshmark Listings: The term “bebor” appears on Poshmark for clothing items (e.g., pink romper, teal shirt dress), unrelated to financial services. This could confuse users searching for Bebor Limited online.
• Clone Firm Risk: Bebor’s lack of regulatory clarity and unverifiable claims increase the risk of it being a clone firm mimicking a legitimate broker, a tactic warned about by Interactive Brokers. Confusion with regulated brokers like Interactive Brokers or Be Brokers could mislead investors.
• Domain Similarity: The domain https://www.beborfx.com resembles typical forex broker naming conventions (e.g., “fx” suffix), which scammers use to blend in with legitimate firms. Assessment: There is a moderate risk of brand confusion with Be Brokers and unrelated entities like Poshmark listings. The potential for Bebor to be a clone firm further heightens this risk, requiring users to carefully verify the broker’s identity.

---

12. Overall Risk Summary ¶

• High-Risk Indicators:
• Multiple complaints about withdrawal issues and unresponsive customer service.
• Unregulated status with an unauthorized U.S. license and no verifiable registration in Hong Kong or the UK.
• Lack of transparency in WHOIS, IP, hosting, and social media presence.
• Aggressive marketing of high leverage (up to 500:1) and high minimum deposits ($2,000–$100,000).
• Potential clone firm risk and brand confusion with Be Brokers or other entities.
• Moderate Risks:
• Website security limited to HTTPS with no disclosed advanced measures.
• Generic website content with unsubstantiated claims of “low latency” and “deep liquidity.”
• Low-Risk Aspects:
• Standard risk warning about margin trading, though this is legally required and not unique. Final Risk Level: High Risk. Bebor Limited exhibits multiple characteristics of a potentially fraudulent or unreliable broker, including unregulated operations, withdrawal complaints, and lack of transparency. The risk of financial loss is significant, and investors should avoid engaging unless regulatory status is independently verified.

---

13. Recommendations ¶

1. Avoid Investment: Given the high-risk indicators, particularly the unregulated status and withdrawal complaints, investors should avoid Bebor Limited until credible regulatory proof is provided.
2. Verify Independently: Use tools like FINRA BrokerCheck, FCA Register, or SFC’s public register to confirm Bebor’s claims.
3. Choose Regulated Alternatives: Opt for brokers regulated by stringent authorities (e.g., FCA, ASIC, SEC), such as Plus500 or Capital.com, which are praised for transparency and compliance.
4. Report Issues: If affected by Bebor, report to regulators or platforms like WikiFX to warn others and seek recourse.
5. Educate Yourself: Review resources on scam prevention from BrokerChooser or Interactive Brokers to recognize red flags.

---

Notes ¶

• Limitations: The analysis is constrained by the lack of real-time WHOIS, IP, or hosting data and limited social media information. Investors should conduct their own due diligence using tools like WHOIS.net, VirusTotal, or Ahrefs.
• Critical Perspective: The establishment narrative around Bebor (e.g., professional website, broad offerings) should not be taken at face value. The complaints and regulatory issues suggest a pattern consistent with scam brokers, despite the polished presentation.
• Citations: All claims are supported by referenced sources where applicable. Unreferenced points are based on general knowledge of broker analysis and scam patterns. If you need further assistance or specific tool-based analysis (e.g., WHOIS lookup, IP scan), please provide additional details or access to such tools.