365Falcon - AI risk analysis

beta

AI risk analysis - 365Falcon (2025-04-29 17:35:36)

Below is a comprehensive analysis of 365Falcon based on the requested criteria, including online complaint information, risk assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting details, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

Multiple sources, including Trustpilot, Scamadviser, Sitejabber, and other scam-focused review platforms, report significant negative feedback about 365Falcon. Key points include:

Trustpilot Reviews: 35 reviews indicate widespread dissatisfaction, with users reporting inability to withdraw funds, aggressive tactics by account managers, and requests for additional fees (e.g., “gains tax” or “escrow wallet” fees). Users describe 365Falcon as a scam, with comments like, “They will entice you with good profits but never pay out.”
Scamadviser: Rates 365Falcon with a very low trust score, citing its recent domain registration and lack of transparency. Users are warned of potential scam activity due to high-risk hosting and unregulated status.
Sitejabber: 5 reviews give 365Falcon a 1.2-star rating, with users alleging loss of funds (e.g., $45,000 recovered by a third party) and manipulative trading practices.
Other Platforms: Scamrecovery.net, FinRecoveryInc, and ScamWatcher report 365Falcon as a scam, with users losing significant sums (e.g., £20,000) and encountering issues like fake trading platforms and untraceable cryptocurrency transactions. Complaint Themes:
Inability to withdraw funds.
Requests for additional deposits or fees to “release” funds.
Use of remote access tools (e.g., AnyDesk, Screenleap) to manipulate user accounts.
Aggressive sales tactics and misrepresentation of profits. Risk Level: High. The volume and consistency of complaints across platforms strongly suggest fraudulent activity.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

Based on the following factors, 365Falcon presents a high-risk profile:

Lack of Regulation: 365Falcon is not authorized by reputable financial regulators (e.g., FCA, CySEC, ASIC). It is blacklisted by FINMA (Swiss regulator) and flagged as unauthorized by the UK’s FCA.
User Feedback: Overwhelmingly negative reviews with reports of financial losses and no recourse for recovery.
Operational Tactics: Use of high-pressure sales, fake trading platforms, and cryptocurrency payments (e.g., TerraUSD, Bitcoin) that are difficult to trace.
Anonymity: Lack of verifiable information about the company’s ownership, management, or physical address.
Recent Domain: The domain was registered recently (before 2021), a common trait of scam websites. Risk Indicators:
High leverage (1:200), which is risky and restricted by regulators in jurisdictions like the EU (1:30) and US (1:50).
Shady payment methods (e.g., Payonera, PayPound, NeoBanQ) associated with fraudulent brokers.
Offshore registration in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a jurisdiction with minimal financial oversight.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

An analysis of 365Falcon’s website security reveals mixed findings:

SSL Certificate: The website has a valid wildcard SSL certificate issued by Sectigo Limited, expiring in October 2022 (last verified January 2022). This provides basic encryption but does not guarantee legitimacy, as many scam sites use SSL.
McAfee Security: McAfee’s assessment found no significant malware or phishing threats but noted potential risks from pop-ups or hidden threats.
WOT Reputation: Web of Trust (WOT) ratings, based on user reviews and third-party data, indicate poor trustworthiness and safety for 365Falcon.
DNSFilter Threat: The website was marked as a threat by DNSFilter within 30 days of analysis, suggesting potential malicious activity. Security Concerns:
The website’s professional appearance is a common tactic used by scam brokers to build credibility.
Lack of transparency about security measures (e.g., no mention of two-factor authentication or data protection policies). Risk Level: Moderate. While basic security measures like SSL are present, the site’s association with scam activities and lack of advanced protections raise concerns.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

WHOIS data for 365falcon.com provides limited transparency:

Registrar: Hosted by Registrar.eu (Hosting Concepts B.V.).
Domain Age: Registered recently (exact date not specified but noted as “very young” in 2021).
Name Servers: Uses ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com, managed by Hostinger.
Contact Information: Likely hidden via privacy protection services, a common practice but a red flag for financial brokers requiring transparency.
Serial and TTL: Serial number 2021102801, TTL 3600, with email dns.hostinger.com. Red Flags:
Recent registration aligns with scam websites that operate briefly before shutting down.
Lack of public ownership details reduces accountability. Risk Level: High. The anonymity and recent registration are consistent with fraudulent brokers.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

Hosting Provider: Google LLC (AS15169), a reputable provider, hosts 365falcon.com. The server is located in the United States.
IP Details: No specific IP address provided, but Google’s infrastructure is reliable and widely used, even by scam sites, due to its affordability and scalability.
Geolocation: The US-based server does not clarify the origin of traffic or the company’s operational base, which claims to be in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Switzerland.
Hosting Risks: While Google is a legitimate provider, the use of a high-risk country (per Scamadviser) for operations (e.g., Saint Vincent) increases risk. Red Flags:
Discrepancy between claimed operational locations (Switzerland, Saint Vincent) and US-based hosting.
High-risk country association suggests potential fraud, as noted by the International Banking Federation. Risk Level: Moderate. The hosting itself is not a direct concern, but the mismatch with claimed locations and high-risk country ties are problematic.

Limited Presence: No verifiable social media accounts (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) were found linked to 365Falcon. Reviews mention social media scams luring users to the platform (e.g., via Facebook), but these are not official accounts.
User Feedback: Social media platforms are cited as sources of initial contact, with users reporting being lured by fake profiles or ads.
Red Flags: Lack of official social media presence is unusual for a legitimate broker, which typically uses platforms for marketing and customer engagement. The use of social media for predatory outreach (e.g., fake profiles) is a strong scam indicator. Risk Level: High. The absence of legitimate social media and reports of predatory tactics are concerning.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

The following red flags were identified:

Regulatory Blacklisting: FINMA (Switzerland) blacklisted 365Falcon on February 3, 2022, for unauthorized financial activities. The FCA (UK) also warns against it.
Anonymity: No information about the company’s CEO, management, or legal entity. The website omits critical details like ownership or verifiable addresses.
Offshore Status: Claims to operate under Saint Vincent and the Grenadines laws, which have no forex broker regulation. The claimed Switzerland address (Rue de la Cité 4, Genève) is non-existent or unverifiable.
High Leverage: Offers 1:200 leverage, far exceeding regulatory limits in reputable jurisdictions.
Shady Payment Methods: Uses obscure platforms (Payonera, PayPound, NeoBanQ) and cryptocurrencies (TerraUSD, Bitcoin), which are hard to trace.
Fake Trading Platform: Users report manipulated trading screens that show fake profits to encourage more deposits.
Pressure Tactics: Aggressive “retention agents” push for additional deposits, and withdrawal requests are met with excuses or fees.
Remote Access: Use of tools like AnyDesk and Screenleap to access user computers, potentially for unauthorized transactions.
Recent Domain: The young domain age suggests a short-lived operation typical of scams.
Negative Reviews: Consistent reports of financial losses and no successful withdrawals. Risk Level: Critical. Multiple red flags across operational, regulatory, and user experience domains indicate a high likelihood of fraud.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

Professional Appearance: The website (365falcon.com) is designed to look credible, with promises of trading tools and resources for beginners. This is a common tactic among scam brokers.
Lack of Transparency: No mention of the company’s legal entity, management, or regulatory licenses. The Terms and Conditions reference Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, an offshore zone with no broker oversight.
Suspicious Claims: Promises of high profits and easy trading are red flags, as legitimate brokers emphasize risks.
Payment Methods: The deposit menu lists only TerraUSD (minimum 250 units) and obscure platforms, avoiding traditional methods like Visa/MasterCard, which offer chargeback options.
Contact Information: Limited to an email (support@365falcon.com) with no phone number or physical address, reducing accountability. Red Flags:
Similarity to other scam broker websites offering “automated trading software” or “HYIP software.”
Hidden clauses in Terms and Conditions, such as high withdrawal fees (20–30%) or impossible trading volume requirements. Risk Level: High. The website’s design and content are tailored to deceive users while providing minimal verifiable information.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

Unregulated: 365Falcon is not licensed by any reputable financial regulator (e.g., FCA, CySEC, ASIC, BaFin).
Blacklisted: FINMA added 365Falcon to its warning list on February 3, 2022, for unauthorized financial activities.
FCA Warning: The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority explicitly states that 365Falcon is not authorized to provide financial services in the UK.
Offshore Claims: The company claims to operate under Saint Vincent and the Grenadines laws, which do not regulate forex brokers. The Financial Services Authority of SVG confirms it does not license such entities.
Fake Addresses: The Switzerland address (Rue de la Cité 4, Genève) is unverifiable and likely fictitious. Risk Level: Critical. The lack of regulation and blacklisting by FINMA and FCA confirm 365Falcon’s illegitimacy.

10. User Precautions ¶

To avoid risks associated with 365Falcon or similar brokers, users should: 1. Verify Regulation: Only use brokers licensed by reputable regulators (e.g., FCA, CySEC, ASIC). Check regulator databases directly. 2. Research Reviews: Cross-check user reviews on platforms like Trustpilot, Sitejabber, and Scamadviser before investing. 3. Avoid Cryptocurrency Payments: Use payment methods like credit cards that allow chargebacks. Avoid cryptocurrencies or obscure platforms like Payonera. 4. Be Wary of High Leverage: Legitimate brokers in regulated jurisdictions offer lower leverage (e.g., 1:30 in the EU). 5. Protect Personal Information: Do not share bank details, IDs, or allow remote access via tools like AnyDesk. 6. Test Withdrawals: Make a small initial deposit and attempt to withdraw funds to verify the broker’s legitimacy. 7. Report Scams: If scammed, file a chargeback with your bank or report to authorities like Action Fraud (UK), FTC (US), or local police. Contact recovery services like MyChargeBack cautiously, verifying their legitimacy. 8. Check Domain Age: Use WHOIS tools to confirm the domain’s registration date. Recent domains are riskier. 9. Avoid Pressure Tactics: Be skeptical of brokers pushing for quick deposits or additional fees. 10. Consult Professionals: Seek advice from financial advisors or legal experts before investing.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

365Falcon’s name and domain variations raise concerns about brand confusion:

Domain Variations: WHOIS data lists multiple similar domains (e.g., 365falcon.net, 365falcon.org, 365falcon.info, 65falcon.com, 365alcon.com, 365fcalcon.com). These could be used to create fake websites or confuse users.
Similar Names: The name “365Falcon” resembles other trading or financial platforms, potentially exploiting trust in established brands. For example, “Falcon” is a common term in finance (e.g., Falcon Bank), which could mislead users.
Trademark Risks: Per USPTO guidelines, trademarks with similar sound, appearance, or commercial impression can cause confusion. 365Falcon’s use of “Falcon” may infringe on existing trademarks, though no specific conflicts were identified.
Local Falcon Comparison: The privacy policy of Local Falcon (localfalcon.com) was referenced, but it is unrelated to 365Falcon. The similarity in names could confuse users searching for legitimate services. Red Flags:
Multiple domain variations suggest a strategy to evade detection or create mirror sites for scams.
Lack of a unique brand identity increases the risk of impersonation or confusion with legitimate firms. Risk Level: Moderate. While no direct trademark violations were confirmed, the use of similar domains and a generic name increases the potential for confusion.

Summary and Recommendation ¶

365Falcon exhibits numerous characteristics of a scam broker, including:

Critical Red Flags: Unregulated status, FINMA and FCA warnings, recent domain, anonymous ownership, and offshore registration.
High-Risk Practices: Manipulative trading platforms, high leverage, shady payment methods, and aggressive sales tactics.
User Losses: Consistent reports of financial losses, inability to withdraw funds, and predatory behavior.
Security and Transparency: Basic SSL but no advanced protections; minimal verifiable information about the company.
Brand Confusion: Multiple domain variations and a generic name increase the risk of deception. Overall Risk Level: Critical. 365Falcon is highly likely to be a fraudulent operation, and users should avoid engaging with it. Recommendation: Do not invest with 365Falcon. If you have already deposited funds, immediately cease communication, gather evidence (e.g., transaction records, emails), and pursue a chargeback through your bank or credit card provider. Report the broker to regulators like the FCA, FINMA, or local authorities. For recovery, use reputable services like MyChargeBack, but verify their legitimacy first. Always conduct thorough due diligence before investing with any broker, prioritizing regulated firms with transparent operations.

Note: This analysis is based on available information as of April 24, 2025, and reflects the critical examination of sources. Users should perform their own research and consult financial authorities for the most current information. If you need specific details (e.g., WHOIS records, additional reviews), let me know, and I can delve deeper.