Infintix - AI risk analysis

beta

AI risk analysis - Infintix (2025-04-29 17:35:36)

Below is a comprehensive analysis of Infintix (official website: https://infintix.com) based on the requested criteria, including online complaint information, risk level assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, potential risk indicators, website content, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. The analysis draws on available information and critical evaluation, with citations where applicable.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

Online reviews and complaints about Infintix reveal significant concerns:

Trustpilot Reviews: Infintix has a 4-star rating on Trustpilot based on approximately 306 reviews, with some users praising its user-friendly platform, low fees, and responsive customer service. However, negative reviews describe severe issues, including inability to withdraw funds, accusations of scamming, and recommendations to pursue chargebacks through banks. One user stated, “GREAT COMPANY TO RIP YOU OFF GOOD LUCK TO GET YOUR MONEY BACK,” highlighting difficulties in recovering funds.
ProductReview.com.au: Infintix received a 1-out-of-5-star rating from two reviews, with users labeling it a “total scam.” Complaints include failure to return invested funds, unauthorized account access via AnyDesk, and attempted hacks after interactions with the platform. One user reported recovering funds only after involving a third party (Revoltseal.tech).
Other Sources: Websites like scamrecovery.net, lucenteq.net, and personal-reviews.com report Infintix as a potential scam, citing issues such as refusal to process withdrawals, pressure to deposit more funds, and use of remote access tools like AnyDesk to manipulate user devices. Users reported losses and warned against trusting the broker. Assessment: The stark contrast between positive and negative reviews suggests possible review manipulation or selective promotion of positive feedback. The consistent complaints about withdrawal issues and unauthorized access are major red flags.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

Based on available data, Infintix presents a high-risk profile for the following reasons:

Lack of Regulation: Infintix is not regulated by any major financial authority (e.g., FCA, ASIC, SEC, CYSEC), which significantly increases the risk of fraud, as there is no oversight to ensure accountability.
Scam Warnings: The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) of New Zealand issued a warning in 2022, identifying Infintix as involved in a scam and lacking legitimacy.
User Experiences: Reports of funds being inaccessible, pressure to deposit additional money, and use of remote access software indicate predatory practices typical of scam brokers.
Operational Transparency: The absence of clear information about the company’s ownership, regulatory status, and terms of service heightens risk. Risk Level: High. Investors face significant risk of financial loss and data compromise due to lack of regulation and reported fraudulent behavior.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

An analysis of Infintix’s website security (https://infintix.com) includes:

SSL Certificate: The website likely uses an SSL certificate (HTTPS), as this is standard for trading platforms. However, specific details (e.g., certificate issuer, validation level) are unavailable without direct access. A Domain Validated (DV) certificate, common for scam sites, offers minimal validation and does not confirm the company’s legitimacy.
Security Headers: No public data confirms the presence of advanced security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options) to protect against attacks like cross-site scripting (XSS).
Vulnerabilities: User reports of attempted hacks after granting AnyDesk access suggest weak security practices or deliberate exploitation. The platform’s request for remote access is highly unusual for a legitimate broker and indicates potential for malware or unauthorized data access. Assessment: While the website may have basic SSL encryption, the reported use of remote access tools and lack of transparency about security measures suggest inadequate protection, increasing the risk of data theft or compromise.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

A WHOIS lookup for infintix.com provides limited information:

Domain Registration: The domain was registered, but specific details (e.g., registrant name, registration date) are often hidden by privacy protection services, a common tactic for fraudulent websites to conceal ownership.
Registrant Information: Infintix is reportedly owned by London Markets Ltd., but no verifiable foundation year or detailed corporate information is provided. The lack of an imprint (required in jurisdictions like Germany) further obscures ownership.
Domain Age: As of March 2022, the domain’s registration date was not publicly verifiable, limiting the ability to assess its longevity or credibility. Assessment: Hidden WHOIS data and lack of transparent ownership details are red flags, as legitimate brokers typically provide clear corporate information.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

Hosting Provider: The website is likely hosted by a third-party provider, possibly Cloudflare, as many modern websites use its services for CDN and DDoS protection. However, specific server details (e.g., IP address, location) are not publicly confirmed.
Server Location: One source mentions a server location in San Francisco, California, which may not align with Infintix’s claimed UK base (London Markets Ltd.), raising questions about authenticity.
IP Reputation: No specific data on IP reputation is available, but the use of a common hosting provider like Cloudflare does not inherently indicate legitimacy, as scammers also leverage such services to obscure their operations. Assessment: The potential mismatch between claimed and actual server locations, combined with generic hosting practices, suggests a lack of operational transparency.

Social Media Footprint: Research on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram indicates dissatisfaction among users, with complaints about Infintix’s reliability and accusations of fraud. There is no evidence of a robust, professional social media presence typical of legitimate brokers.
Engagement: Negative feedback on social media and trading forums suggests a lack of trust, with users warning others to avoid the platform.
Red Flags: The absence of active, verifiable social media accounts or professional engagement (e.g., regular updates, customer support) is concerning, as legitimate brokers typically maintain a strong online presence. Assessment: Infintix’s limited and negative social media presence reinforces concerns about its credibility and customer trust.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Several red flags and risk indicators are evident:

Unregulated Status: Infintix lacks authorization from major regulators, increasing the risk of fraud.
FMA Warning: The New Zealand FMA’s scam warning is a critical indicator of fraudulent activity.
Withdrawal Issues: Consistent user reports of delayed or blocked withdrawals, often accompanied by demands for additional deposits, are hallmarks of scam brokers.
Remote Access Requests: The use of AnyDesk for supposed withdrawals is highly suspicious and suggests intent to gain unauthorized access to users’ devices.
Aggressive Sales Tactics: Users report pressure to deposit more funds, including unsolicited calls and promises of guaranteed profits, which are common scam tactics.
Missing Terms and Conditions: The broker’s terms and conditions link was reported as broken, preventing users from understanding their legal obligations.
Lack of Imprint: The absence of a legally required imprint (e.g., in Germany) indicates non-compliance with transparency regulations. Assessment: Multiple red flags, including regulatory warnings, withdrawal issues, and predatory practices, strongly suggest that Infintix is not a trustworthy broker.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

Claims and Promises: Infintix’s website claims to offer “simple and secure software for online trading” with access to crypto, forex, shares, and indices via the MetaTrader4 (MT4) platform. However, these claims are undermined by the lack of regulatory backing and user complaints.
Professionalism: The website may appear professional at first glance, but issues like broken links (e.g., terms and conditions) and lack of detailed corporate information suggest a lack of legitimacy.
Transparency: The site provides minimal information about ownership, regulatory status, or risk warnings, which is atypical for reputable brokers.
Risk Warnings: If present, risk warnings are likely hidden or downplayed, a common tactic among scam brokers to lure inexperienced traders. Assessment: The website’s polished appearance is overshadowed by missing critical information, broken links, and unverifiable claims, indicating potential deception.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

No Regulation: Infintix is not registered or regulated by any major financial authority, such as the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), SEC (USA), or CYSEC (Cyprus). This lack of oversight means users have no recourse through regulatory bodies in case of disputes.
FMA Warning: The New Zealand FMA explicitly warned that Infintix is involved in a scam, reinforcing its unregulated and fraudulent status.
False Claims: Some scam brokers display fake regulatory licenses or claim to be domiciled in regulated jurisdictions. While Infintix does not explicitly claim regulation, its association with London Markets Ltd. may be an attempt to imply legitimacy without evidence. Assessment: Infintix’s complete lack of regulatory oversight, combined with an official scam warning, makes it highly risky and likely fraudulent.

10. User Precautions ¶

To protect against potential risks when considering Infintix or similar brokers, users should:

Verify Regulation: Only engage with brokers regulated by top-tier authorities (e.g., FCA, ASIC, SEC). Check regulatory status directly with the authority’s website.
Research Reviews: Read reviews on multiple platforms (e.g., Trustpilot, ProductReview) and cross-reference with scam warning sites. Be wary of overly positive reviews that may be manipulated.
Avoid Remote Access: Never grant remote access to your device via tools like AnyDesk, as this can lead to data theft or unauthorized transactions.
Test Withdrawals: Deposit small amounts initially and test the withdrawal process before committing significant funds.
Secure Devices: Use strong passwords, two-factor authentication, and updated antivirus software to protect against malware or hacking attempts.
File Chargebacks: If scammed, immediately contact your bank or credit card provider to initiate a chargeback. Seek assistance from services like MyChargeBack if needed.
Report Scams: Report issues to local authorities and financial regulators, and share experiences on review platforms to warn others. Assessment: Users must exercise extreme caution, prioritizing regulated brokers and robust security practices to avoid financial loss.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

Infintix’s name and operations may cause confusion with legitimate brokers, such as:

Infinox: A regulated broker (https://www.infinox.com) overseen by the FCA and other authorities. Infinox is flagged as safe by BrokerChooser, in contrast to Infintix, which is explicitly labeled unsafe. The similarity in names (Infintix vs. Infinox) could be a deliberate attempt to mislead users into believing Infintix is affiliated with a reputable brand.
Other Brokers: Infintix’s claim of offering MT4 and trading in crypto, forex, and stocks mimics the services of legitimate brokers, potentially confusing inexperienced traders. Assessment: The close resemblance to Infinox’s name and services suggests possible intentional brand confusion to exploit the reputation of regulated brokers.

Conclusion ¶

Infintix (https://infintix.com) exhibits numerous characteristics of a scam broker, including:

Lack of regulation and an explicit scam warning from the New Zealand FMA.
Consistent user complaints about withdrawal issues, pressure tactics, and unauthorized device access via AnyDesk.
Hidden ownership, missing terms and conditions, and lack of transparency in WHOIS and corporate details.
Negative social media feedback and limited professional presence.
Potential brand confusion with regulated brokers like Infinox. Recommendation: Avoid Infintix due to its high-risk profile and strong evidence of fraudulent activity. Investors should prioritize brokers regulated by top-tier authorities, thoroughly research reviews, and implement strict security measures to protect their funds and data. If you have already engaged with Infintix and suspect fraud, immediately:

Contact your bank for a chargeback.
Report the issue to local authorities and financial regulators.
Seek assistance from recovery services like MyChargeBack. For further verification, check regulatory databases (e.g., FCA, ASIC) and consult trusted review platforms before engaging with any broker.

Note: This analysis is based on publicly available information as of April 24, 2025, and critical evaluation of sources. Always conduct your own due diligence before making financial decisions.