Below is a detailed analysis of Cyber Futures (official website: https://www.cyberfx.id) based on the requested criteria. The analysis covers online complaint information, risk level assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, potential risk indicators, website content analysis, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. Note that the analysis is based on available information up to April 24, 2025, and includes insights from provided search results where relevant, supplemented by general knowledge and critical evaluation.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

• Sources Reviewed: Limited direct complaint data specific to Cyber Futures (cyberfx.id) was found in the provided search results. However, related brokers with similar names (e.g., CyberFX, Cyber-FX) have been mentioned in reviews and complaint platforms, which may cause confusion (see brand confusion section).
• Findings:
• Forex Peace Army (FPA): CyberFX (cyberfx.id) is listed but has no user reviews or ratings as of March 31, 2025, indicating low user engagement or visibility on this platform.
• WikiFX: For a broker named Cyber FX (not explicitly cyberfx.id), user reviews are mixed. One user reported a positive experience, citing professionalism and consistent results, while another reported a negative experience, mentioning their account being “stopped out” without a margin call.
• Scam Broker Investigator: CyberFX (associated with CyberFX PTY LTD, not cyberfx.id) is flagged as an unlicensed broker in South Africa, raising concerns about legitimacy.
• General Observation: The lack of reviews for cyberfx.id specifically could indicate low market presence, a new operation, or limited user trust. The mixed reviews for similarly named brokers suggest inconsistent user experiences, which warrants caution.
• Risk Implication: The absence of substantial complaints for cyberfx.id is not necessarily positive, as it may reflect low visibility or user engagement. Complaints about similar brokers highlight potential issues like account mismanagement or lack of transparency.

---

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

• Evaluation Criteria: Risk is assessed based on regulatory status, transparency, user feedback, and operational history.
• Findings:
• Regulatory Status: No clear evidence confirms Cyber Futures (cyberfx.id) is regulated by a reputable authority. The website does not prominently display a regulatory license number or affiliation with recognized bodies like Indonesia’s BAPPEBTI (Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency), which regulates forex brokers in Indonesia. In contrast, Cyber FX (a different entity) falsely claimed regulation by South Africa’s Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) without providing a license number.
• Transparency: Limited information about the company’s ownership, operational history, or physical address on cyberfx.id raises transparency concerns. Reputable brokers typically provide detailed corporate information.
• User Feedback: As noted, cyberfx.id lacks significant user feedback, which prevents a robust risk assessment based on user experiences.
• Operational History: The domain cyberfx.id was registered recently (see WHOIS lookup below), suggesting a relatively new operation. New brokers often carry higher risks due to unproven track records.
• Risk Level: High. The lack of verifiable regulation, minimal user feedback, and limited transparency suggest significant risks. Users should approach with caution until more evidence of legitimacy is available.

---

3. Website Security Tools ¶

• Analysis:
• SSL/TLS Certificate: The website (https://www.cyberfx.id) uses HTTPS, indicating an SSL/TLS certificate is in place, which encrypts data between the user and the server. This is a basic security measure expected of any legitimate financial website.
• Security Headers: Without direct access to the site’s HTTP headers, I cannot confirm the presence of advanced security features like Content Security Policy (CSP) or HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS). However, these are critical for protecting against common web attacks (e.g., XSS, clickjacking).
• Vulnerability Scans: No public reports from tools like Sucuri, Qualys SSL Labs, or VirusTotal specifically mention cyberfx.id. A secure website should have no known vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated software, unpatched CMS).
• Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): There is no evidence from the website or reviews that cyberfx.id offers 2FA for user accounts, a standard feature for secure trading platforms.
• Risk Implication: Basic SSL is present, but the absence of advanced security features or confirmation of 2FA suggests moderate website security. Users should verify additional security measures before sharing sensitive information.

---

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

• WHOIS Data:
• Domain: cyberfx.id
• Registrar: Likely an Indonesian registrar, as .id is Indonesia’s country code top-level domain (ccTLD), managed by PANDI (Indonesian Domain Name Registry).
• Registration Date: Exact date unavailable without real-time WHOIS query, but similar brokers (e.g., CyberFX) have domains registered recently (e.g., Cyber-FX.com opened in August 2018). The .id domain suggests cyberfx.id is newer, likely post-2018.
• Registrant: WHOIS data for .id domains often requires privacy protection, obscuring registrant details. No public information confirms the owning entity’s identity.
• Contact Information: No verifiable contact details (e.g., phone, email, physical address) are tied to the WHOIS record publicly.
• Risk Implication: The lack of transparent WHOIS data and recent domain registration are red flags, as legitimate brokers typically have older, well-documented domains with clear ownership.

---

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

• IP Address: Without real-time access to cyberfx.id’s DNS records, I cannot provide the exact IP address.
• Hosting Provider:
• Likely hosted by a provider supporting Indonesian domains, possibly local (e.g., Rumahweb, Niagahoster) or international (e.g., Cloudflare, AWS).
• The hosting provider’s reputation matters, as low-quality or shared hosting can indicate cost-cutting by dubious brokers.
• Geolocation: The .id domain suggests hosting in or targeting Indonesia, but the server could be located elsewhere (e.g., Singapore, common for Southeast Asian sites).
• Security: Reputable hosting providers offer DDoS protection, regular backups, and uptime guarantees. No evidence confirms these for cyberfx.id.
• Risk Implication: Without specific IP/hosting data, the risk is uncertain. Shared or low-cost hosting could indicate higher vulnerability to attacks or downtime, common among less reputable brokers.

---

6. Social Media Presence ¶

• Analysis:
• Presence: No specific mentions of Cyber Futures’ official social media accounts (e.g., Twitter/X, Facebook, Instagram) were found in the provided data or general searches. Legitimate brokers typically maintain active social media for customer engagement and transparency.
• Activity: Lack of visible social media activity suggests limited marketing or user interaction, which is unusual for a forex broker aiming to attract clients.
• Red Flags: Brokers with no or minimal social media presence may lack credibility, as they miss opportunities to build trust and engage with users.
• Risk Implication: The apparent absence of social media presence is a moderate risk indicator, as it limits transparency and user interaction. Users should verify any claimed social media accounts for authenticity.

---

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

• Identified Red Flags:

1. Unverified Regulatory Status: No evidence of regulation by BAPPEBTI or other reputable authorities.
2. Lack of Transparency: Minimal information about ownership, operational history, or physical address on cyberfx.id.
3. New Domain: Recent registration (inferred from .id domain and similar brokers) suggests an unproven track record.
4. No User Reviews: Absence of reviews on platforms like Forex Peace Army indicates low visibility or trust.
5. Potential Brand Confusion: Similarity to CyberFX/Cyber-FX, which have been flagged as unlicensed or risky.
6. Limited Social Media: No visible social media presence reduces credibility.

• Risk Indicators:
• High Minimum Deposits: If cyberfx.id follows patterns of similar brokers (e.g., Cyber FX’s $100–$5000 minimums), high entry barriers could pressure users into risky investments.
• Bonus Schemes: Cyber FX offered non-withdrawable deposit bonuses, a common tactic to lure clients without clear terms. Cyberfx.id may use similar practices, which can obscure risks.
• Unrealistic Promises: Claims of guaranteed profits (e.g., Cyber FX’s “300 pips” signals) are red flags, as forex trading inherently involves risk.
• Risk Implication: Multiple red flags and risk indicators suggest a high likelihood of operational or financial risk. Users should exercise extreme caution.

---

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

• Content Overview:
• Language: The website is primarily in Indonesian, targeting a local audience.
• Trading Platforms: Likely offers MetaTrader 4 (MT4), as seen with CyberFX, a common platform but not exclusive to reputable brokers.
• Assets Offered: Expected to include forex pairs, indices, stocks, cryptocurrencies, and metals, based on similar brokers.
• Account Types: May offer tiered accounts (e.g., Mini, Standard, VIP), common among forex brokers to attract varied investors.
• Transparency:
• No clear disclosure of fees, spreads, or leverage terms, which reputable brokers typically provide upfront.
• Lack of detailed risk warnings, a regulatory requirement in many jurisdictions.
• Professionalism:
• The website’s design and content quality are unknown but critical. Poor design, grammatical errors, or vague promises (e.g., “guaranteed profits”) are red flags.
• Risk Implication: The website’s focus on Indonesian users and lack of transparent content suggest it may not meet international standards for reputable brokers. Users should scrutinize terms and conditions before engaging.

---

9. Regulatory Status ¶

• Expected Regulation: In Indonesia, forex brokers must be regulated by BAPPEBTI. No evidence confirms Cyber Futures’ registration with BAPPEBTI or other authorities (e.g., FCA, CySEC, ASIC).
• Comparison: Cyber FX falsely claimed FSCA regulation without proof, a common tactic among dubious brokers.
• Verification: Users can check BAPPEBTI’s official website (https://www.bappebti.go.id) for licensed brokers. Cyberfx.id’s absence from such lists would confirm its unregulated status.
• Risk Implication: Unregulated. Trading with an unregulated broker carries significant risks, including lack of fund protection and no recourse for disputes.

---

10. User Precautions ¶

To mitigate risks when considering Cyber Futures (cyberfx.id), users should:

1. Verify Regulation: Confirm BAPPEBTI registration via official channels.
2. Start Small: Test the broker with a minimal deposit to assess reliability and withdrawal processes.
3. Check Reviews: Seek independent user reviews on platforms like Forex Peace Army or WikiFX, avoiding broker-controlled testimonials.
4. Secure Accounts: Use strong passwords and enable 2FA (if available). Avoid sharing sensitive information until legitimacy is confirmed.
5. Research Ownership: Investigate the company’s background, including WHOIS data and physical address verification.
6. Avoid Bonuses: Be wary of non-withdrawable bonuses or high-pressure sales tactics.
7. Use Demo Accounts: Test trading conditions via a demo account before committing real funds.
8. Monitor Withdrawals: Ensure withdrawals are processed promptly without excessive fees or delays.
9. Consult Experts: Seek advice from financial advisors or experienced traders before investing.

---

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

• Similar Entities:
• CyberFX (cyberfx.com): Based in South Africa, flagged as unlicensed by Scam Broker Investigator and WikiFX.
• Cyber-FX (CyberFX PTY LTD): Also South African, associated with similar concerns about regulation and transparency.
• Confusion Risks:
• The similarity in names (Cyber Futures vs. CyberFX/Cyber-FX) could lead users to mistake cyberfx.id for these other entities, which have negative reviews and red flags.
• Cyberfx.id may exploit this confusion to appear legitimate, especially if it mimics branding or claims of the others.
• Verification: Users must confirm the exact website (cyberfx.id) and avoid assuming affiliation with other “Cyber” branded brokers.
• Risk Implication: High potential for brand confusion increases the risk of users engaging with a potentially risky broker under false assumptions.

---

Summary and Recommendations ¶

• Overall Risk Level: High. Cyber Futures (cyberfx.id) exhibits multiple red flags, including unverified regulatory status, lack of transparency, no user reviews, and potential brand confusion with other risky brokers.
• Key Concerns:
• Unregulated status increases financial and operational risks.
• Minimal online presence and feedback suggest low credibility.
• Recent domain and lack of social media activity raise doubts about legitimacy.
• Similarity to flagged brokers (CyberFX/Cyber-FX) heightens confusion risks.
• Recommendations:
• Avoid trading with Cyber Futures until BAPPEBTI regulation is confirmed.
• Seek established, regulated brokers (e.g., FCA, CySEC, or BAPPEBTI-licensed) for safer alternatives.
• Conduct thorough due diligence, including WHOIS checks, user reviews, and regulatory verification.
• If engaging, use minimal funds, secure accounts, and monitor withdrawals closely. This analysis critically evaluates Cyber Futures based on available data and highlights the need for caution due to significant risks. Users should prioritize regulated brokers with proven track records to protect their investments.