¿Cuándo se fundó la empresa Statemind?-Statemind

beta

AI risk analysis - Metaversesworld (2025-04-29 17:35:37)

Below is a comprehensive analysis of MetaversesWorld, based on the provided official website (https://metaversesworld.org/de/) and available information, covering online complaints, risk assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. The analysis draws from relevant web sources where applicable and critically evaluates the information to provide a clear picture.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

Trustpilot Reviews: MetaversesWorld has received 23 reviews on Trustpilot, all of which are complaints, indicating significant user dissatisfaction. Common issues include:
Withdrawal problems: Users report unprocessed withdrawal requests and unexpected fees despite assurances otherwise (e.g., a Trustpilot user on December 12, 2022, noted being charged withdrawal fees contrary to agent promises).
Poor customer service: Complaints highlight unresponsive or misleading support.
Other Platforms: Feedback on platforms like ScamWatcher and TheForexReview echoes Trustpilot, with users labeling MetaversesWorld as untrustworthy and cautioning against investment due to scam-like behavior.
General Sentiment: Across social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) and trading forums, a recurring theme is dissatisfaction, with users warning about the broker’s lack of transparency and reliability. Conclusion: The overwhelming negative feedback, particularly around withdrawal issues and deceptive practices, suggests a high likelihood of fraudulent activity.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

Broker Type: MetaversesWorld is an offshore broker, registered under Pristine Group LLC in St. Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG), a jurisdiction known for lax regulation and anonymous company incorporation.
Regulatory Warnings: Multiple regulators have issued warnings:
Austrian FMA (July 23, 2022)
Spanish CNMV (September 19, 2022)
German BaFin (August 2022), which also investigated Pristine Group LLC for ties to other fraudulent brokers (FinFix, NvestPro).
Trading Conditions:
High Leverage: Fixed at 1:200, which is risky and exceeds regulatory caps in jurisdictions like the EU/UK (1:30 for retail clients).
Wide Spreads: EUR/USD spreads at 3 pips, double the industry standard, making profitable trading difficult.
Bonus Policy: Requires an unrealistic trading volume (deposit + bonus x 25) before withdrawals, a tactic often used by scams to trap funds.
Lack of Demo Account: No free demo account, forcing users to invest immediately, which is unusual for legitimate brokers.
Fraud Indicators: The broker’s offshore status, regulatory warnings, and restrictive withdrawal policies align with characteristics of high-risk, potentially fraudulent entities. Risk Level: High. The combination of offshore registration, regulatory blacklisting, and predatory trading conditions indicates significant risk to users’ funds.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

SSL Certificate: The website (https://metaversesworld.org/de/) uses HTTPS, indicating an SSL certificate, which is standard for encrypting data. However, a valid SSL certificate alone does not guarantee legitimacy, as many scam sites also use SSL.
Security Headers: No specific information is available on advanced security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options) or additional protections like DDoS mitigation.
Platform: The trading platform is WebTrader, a basic, browser-based terminal lacking the robustness of industry-standard platforms like MT4, MT5, or cTrader. Its simplicity may appeal to beginners but limits functionality and raises concerns about reliability.
Vulnerabilities: No public reports of specific website vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL injection, XSS) were found, but the lack of transparency about security practices is concerning. Conclusion: While the site has basic security (SSL), the use of a simplistic platform and lack of detailed security information suggest minimal investment in robust protections, typical of low-trust brokers.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

Domain Information:
Domain: metaversesworld.org
Registrar: Likely registered through a provider adhering to ICANN policies, but specific registrar details are unavailable due to GDPR restrictions on WHOIS data for .org domains.
Registration Date: Likely registered in early 2022, based on the timing of reviews and regulatory warnings (first complaints appeared April 2022).
Expiration Date: Not publicly accessible without a direct WHOIS query, but .org domains typically have 1-10 year terms.
Privacy Protection: GDPR compliance means personal data (e.g., registrant name, address) is hidden. This is standard for EU-based registrants but can obscure accountability for offshore entities.
Red Flags: The lack of transparent WHOIS data, combined with the broker’s offshore status, makes it difficult to verify ownership or operational location, a common tactic among fraudulent brokers. Conclusion: The obscured WHOIS data and offshore registration align with practices used by untrustworthy entities to avoid scrutiny.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

IP Address: Specific IP details for metaversesworld.org are not publicly available in the provided data. A manual lookup (e.g., via tools like WHOIS.domaintools.com) would be needed to confirm the hosting provider and server location.
Hosting Provider: Likely hosted by a budget provider, as scam brokers often use low-cost hosting to minimize expenses. Common providers for such sites include Cloudflare or offshore hosts in jurisdictions with lax oversight.
Geolocation: Given the broker’s SVG registration and targeting of German-speaking users (e.g., Germany, Austria), servers may be located in Europe or an offshore hub to reduce latency, but this is speculative without IP data.
Red Flags: If hosted in an offshore jurisdiction or through a provider known for hosting scam sites, this would further indicate risk. The lack of transparency about hosting details is itself a concern. Conclusion: Without specific IP/hosting data, the analysis is limited, but the broker’s offshore nature suggests hosting practices may prioritize anonymity over reliability.

Presence: No verified social media accounts (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, Instagram) for MetaversesWorld were identified in the provided data. The broker reportedly uses social media platforms to attract victims, particularly Meta platforms (Facebook, Instagram), but these may be unverified or fake accounts.
Tactics: Scammers often use private WhatsApp/Telegram groups, LinkedIn ads, or even dating apps (Tinder, Bumble) to lure victims with promises of high returns.
Red Flags:
Lack of official, verifiable social media profiles is unusual for a legitimate broker.
Use of private chat groups or unsolicited outreach (e.g., cold calls, emails) is a hallmark of scam operations.
User Feedback: Social media feedback is overwhelmingly negative, with users warning against MetaversesWorld on trading forums and platforms like Twitter. Conclusion: The absence of a transparent social media presence and reliance on shady marketing tactics (private chats, fake ads) strongly suggest fraudulent intent.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Anonymity: The broker’s ownership (Pristine Group LLC) is opaque, with no verifiable information about the CEO or operational team.
Offshore Status: Registration in SVG, where forex brokers are unregulated, allows MetaversesWorld to operate without oversight.
Regulatory Blacklisting: Warnings from FMA, CNMV, and BaFin confirm the broker’s illicit activities.
Unrealistic Promises: Promises of bonuses, guaranteed profits, or risk-free trading are common scam tactics.
Lack of Transparency: No clear information on fees (e.g., inactivity charges), banking details, or withdrawal processes.
Targeting Vulnerable Users: Focus on German-speaking countries (Germany, Austria) suggests targeted scams exploiting less-regulated markets.
Association with Other Scams: Pristine Group LLC is linked to other fraudulent brokers (FinFix, NvestPro), indicating a pattern of scam operations. Conclusion: Multiple red flags—offshore status, regulatory warnings, lack of transparency, and predatory tactics—point to a high-risk, likely fraudulent broker.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

Content Overview: The website (https://metaversesworld.org/de/) markets itself as a trendy, high-tech trading platform tied to the “metaverse” concept, likely to capitalize on the term’s popularity.
Claims: Promises access to forex, crypto, and other assets with advanced technology, but lacks specifics on platform features or security.
Language and Design:
The German-language version (/de/) targets German-speaking users, suggesting localization to exploit regional markets.
Design is likely professional to appear legitimate, but content is vague, focusing on buzzwords (“metaverse”) rather than concrete details.
Legal Section: Contains a bonus policy that locks funds until an unrealistic trading volume is met, a tactic banned in the EEA and UK.
Red Flags:
Vague or missing information about ownership, licensing, or operational details.
Use of “metaverse” branding to mislead users into thinking it’s a cutting-edge platform. Conclusion: The website uses buzzwords and professional design to appear legitimate but lacks substance and contains predatory terms, reinforcing scam suspicions.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

Unregulated: MetaversesWorld has no license from any reputable regulator (e.g., CySEC, FCA, ASIC). The SVG Financial Services Authority (SVGFSA) does not regulate forex brokers, leaving clients unprotected.
Regulatory Warnings: Blacklisted by FMA, CNMV, and BaFin, confirming illegal operations in Europe.
Comparison to Regulated Brokers: Legitimate brokers (e.g., under CySEC or FCA) offer:
Segregated client accounts
Deposit insurance (€20,000 in Cyprus, £85,000 in the UK)
Leverage caps (1:30) and negative balance protection MetaversesWorld offers none of these protections.
Legal Risks: Operating without a license is illegal in jurisdictions requiring registration, exposing users to financial and legal risks. Conclusion: The broker’s unregulated status and blacklisting by multiple authorities confirm it is not a safe or legal entity for trading.

10. User Precautions ¶

To protect against risks associated with MetaversesWorld or similar brokers, users should:

Verify Regulation: Only trade with brokers licensed by reputable regulators (e.g., CySEC, FCA, ASIC). Check license details on regulator websites.
Research Reviews: Check platforms like Trustpilot, ScamWatcher, or trading forums for user feedback before investing.
Avoid Offshore Brokers: Brokers in jurisdictions like SVG often lack oversight and should be avoided.
Test Withdrawals: Deposit small amounts initially and test withdrawals to ensure funds can be accessed.
Use Secure Payment Methods: Prefer credit/debit cards over crypto or wire transfers, as cards offer chargeback options.
Beware of Promises: Avoid brokers promising guaranteed profits, bonuses, or risk-free trading.
Consult Experts: If scammed, contact services like MyChargeBack for fund recovery assistance.
Secure Accounts: Use strong passwords, enable two-factor authentication (if available), and avoid sharing personal data. Conclusion: Users must exercise extreme caution, prioritizing regulated brokers and thorough due diligence to avoid scams like MetaversesWorld.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

“Metaverse” Branding: The name “MetaversesWorld” leverages the popularity of the metaverse concept, potentially confusing users into associating it with legitimate metaverse-related companies (e.g., Meta, Roblox).
Trademark Issues: The name may create a “likelihood of confusion” with registered trademarks, as it sounds similar to metaverse-related brands. This could violate USPTO or EUIPO guidelines if challenged.
Deceptive Intent: The use of “metaverse” appears designed to mislead users into believing the broker is tied to innovative technology, despite being a standard forex scam.
Comparison to Legitimate Platforms: Unlike Meta or Roblox, which offer immersive virtual worlds, MetaversesWorld is a trading platform with no verifiable metaverse integration, further highlighting deceptive branding. Conclusion: The broker’s name is likely chosen to exploit the metaverse trend, creating confusion with legitimate brands and misleading users about its services.

Summary ¶

MetaversesWorld (https://metaversesworld.org/de/) is a high-risk, likely fraudulent offshore broker with significant red flags:

Complaints: Widespread user dissatisfaction, particularly around withdrawals and deceptive practices.
Risk Level: High, due to unregulated status, regulatory warnings, and predatory trading conditions.
Website Security: Basic SSL but lacks advanced protections; uses a simplistic WebTrader platform.
WHOIS/IP: Obscured ownership and hosting details, typical of scam operations.
Social Media: No verified presence; uses shady marketing tactics (private chats, fake ads).
Red Flags: Anonymity, offshore registration, blacklisting, and unrealistic promises.
Regulatory Status: Unregulated, with warnings from FMA, CNMV, and BaFin.
Precautions: Users should avoid this broker, prioritize regulated alternatives, and conduct thorough due diligence.
Brand Confusion: Exploits “metaverse” branding to mislead users. Recommendation: Avoid MetaversesWorld entirely. Opt for brokers regulated by reputable authorities (e.g., CySEC, FCA) and verify their credentials before investing. If you’ve been scammed, consider contacting recovery services like MyChargeBack.

Note: Due to GDPR, WHOIS data for .org domains may be limited. For precise WHOIS or IP details, use tools like IONOS or DENIC (for .de domains, though not applicable here). If you need further assistance or specific lookups, let me know