When was Power Global Market founded?-Power Global Market

beta

AI risk analysis - FX EXCHANGETRADE (2025-04-29 17:35:38)

Analysis of FX EXCHANGETRADE Given the lack of specific website information for FX EXCHANGETRADE and the possibility that it may be a shell company, this analysis will leverage available data from provided web sources, focusing on online complaints, risk level assessment, regulatory status, and potential red flags. The absence of a verifiable website and the suspicion of it being a shell company necessitate heightened scrutiny. Below is a comprehensive evaluation based on the requested criteria.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

Complaints Identified: There is no direct mention of specific user complaints against FX EXCHANGETRADE in the provided sources, such as withdrawal issues or fraudulent practices. However, the lack of user reviews or complaints could indicate either a low-profile operation or a newly established entity, both of which raise concerns when coupled with other red flags.
Implication: The absence of complaints does not confirm legitimacy, especially for a potential shell company. It may suggest limited operational history or deliberate obscurity to avoid scrutiny. Shell companies often operate under the radar to minimize exposure to complaints.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

High Risk Indicators: FX EXCHANGETRADE is flagged as a high-risk entity due to its lack of regulatory authorization and questionable claims. The company’s domain was newly created on March 20, 2022, yet it claims an implausible daily trading volume of $5.5 trillion, which is inconsistent with a new operation.
Shell Company Concerns: The suspicion that FX EXCHANGETRADE may be a shell company aligns with its lack of transparency and unverifiable claims. Shell companies often exist to obscure ownership, facilitate fraud, or misrepresent operations, increasing the risk of financial loss for investors.
Risk Level: High. The combination of a newly registered domain, lack of regulatory oversight, and unverifiable claims suggests significant risk, particularly for a potential shell company.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

Lack of Website Information: Without a specific website URL, it’s impossible to conduct a direct analysis of website security (e.g., SSL certificates, HTTPS protocols, or vulnerability scans). The absence of a verifiable website is itself a major red flag, as legitimate brokers typically maintain transparent, secure online platforms.
Implication for Shell Company: Shell companies often lack functional websites or use temporary, poorly secured domains to avoid detection. The inability to provide a website suggests FX EXCHANGETRADE may not have a legitimate operational platform, further supporting the shell company hypothesis.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

Domain Information: The domain for FX EXCHANGETRADE was registered on March 20, 2022, indicating a very recent establishment.
Ownership Details: No specific WHOIS data (e.g., registrant name, contact details) is provided in the sources. Legitimate brokers typically have transparent WHOIS records, while shell companies often use privacy protection services or false information to obscure ownership.
Red Flag: A newly registered domain with no operational history is highly suspicious, especially for a company claiming to be a major player in the forex market. This aligns with tactics used by shell companies to create a facade of legitimacy.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

No Data Available: Without a website URL, IP address, or hosting details, no analysis can be conducted. Legitimate brokers typically host their websites on reputable servers with traceable IP addresses and hosting providers.
Implication: The absence of hosting information reinforces the possibility that FX EXCHANGETRADE is a shell company with no operational infrastructure. Shell companies often avoid establishing robust digital footprints to evade tracking.

No Social Media Presence Identified: The sources do not mention any social media accounts associated with FX EXCHANGETRADE. Legitimate brokers typically maintain active social media profiles on platforms like Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook to engage with clients and build trust.
Red Flag: A lack of social media presence is concerning, as it suggests limited public engagement or an intentional effort to remain obscure. Shell companies often avoid social media to minimize exposure to scrutiny or complaints.
Potential Risks: Fraudulent brokers sometimes use social media to lure victims with fake testimonials or promotions. If FX EXCHANGETRADE has social media accounts not mentioned in the sources, they should be scrutinized for signs of manipulation (e.g., fake followers, paid reviews).

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Unverifiable Claims: FX EXCHANGETRADE claims to be the “largest market in the world” with a daily trading volume of $5.5 trillion, which is implausible for a company with a domain registered in March 2022. This exaggeration is a classic red flag of fraudulent operations.
False Regulatory Claims: The company claims to be a UK-based firm registered with Companies House under number 09914444. However, this number belongs to “TRADE FAST INTERNATIONAL LTD,” which has no connection to FX EXCHANGETRADE.
Blacklisted by FCA: On April 7, 2022, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a warning that FX EXCHANGETRADE is not authorized to provide financial services in the UK, confirming its unregulated status.
Shell Company Characteristics: The mismatch between its claimed registration and actual records, combined with the lack of a verifiable website, suggests FX EXCHANGETRADE may be a shell company used to mislead investors or obscure fraudulent activities.
Other Indicators:
Lack of transparency regarding ownership, management, or operational details.
No evidence of client reviews, trading platforms, or operational history.
Potential for clone firm scams, where the company mimics a legitimate entity to deceive investors.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

No Website Available: Without a website, no content analysis (e.g., terms of service, risk disclosures, or promotional claims) can be performed. Legitimate brokers provide detailed website content, including regulatory information, trading conditions, and risk warnings.
Implication: The absence of a website is highly unusual for a broker claiming significant market presence. This strongly supports the hypothesis that FX EXCHANGETRADE is a shell company with no genuine operational platform.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

Unregulated and Blacklisted: FX EXCHANGETRADE is not authorized or registered by the FCA, despite claiming to be a UK-based firm. The FCA’s warning on April 7, 2022, explicitly states that it is operating illegally in the UK.
No Other Regulatory Oversight: There is no evidence of registration with other reputable regulators (e.g., ASIC, CySEC, CFTC, or NFA). The company’s claim of being registered with Companies House is misleading, as the cited registration number belongs to an unrelated entity.
Shell Company Implications: Shell companies often falsely claim regulatory status to gain trust. FX EXCHANGETRADE’s misrepresentation of its Companies House registration and lack of FCA authorization are consistent with this tactic.
Risk of Fraud: Unregulated brokers pose significant risks, including fund misappropriation, withdrawal refusals, and lack of legal recourse for investors.

10. User Precautions ¶

To protect against potential risks associated with FX EXCHANGETRADE, users should:

Avoid Engagement: Do not deposit funds or share personal information with FX EXCHANGETRADE, given its unregulated status and FCA blacklist.
Verify Regulatory Status: Always check a broker’s license with reputable regulators (e.g., FCA, ASIC, CySEC) using official registries. For UK brokers, visit fca.org.uk.
Conduct Due Diligence: Research independent reviews on platforms like Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army, or BrokersView. Be wary of brokers with no reviews or unverifiable claims.
Beware of Shell Companies: Look for signs of shell companies, such as newly registered domains, mismatched registration details, or lack of operational transparency.
Report Suspected Fraud: If you’ve interacted with FX EXCHANGETRADE, report issues to the FCA (fca.org.uk/consumers/report-scam-unauthorised-firm) or CFTC (cftc.gov/complaint).
Consult Professionals: Seek advice from independent financial or legal advisors before investing.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

Misleading Name: The name “FX EXCHANGETRADE” resembles generic terms used in the forex industry, potentially causing confusion with legitimate brokers or exchanges. This tactic is common among fraudulent entities to exploit brand familiarity.
Clone Firm Risk: The mismatch between its claimed Companies House registration and the actual entity (TRADE FAST INTERNATIONAL LTD) suggests FX EXCHANGETRADE may be a clone firm, falsely associating itself with a registered company to appear legitimate.
Implication: Investors may mistake FX EXCHANGETRADE for a regulated broker or confuse it with established firms, increasing the risk of falling victim to fraud.

12. Additional Considerations for Shell Company Analysis ¶

Purpose of Shell Company: If FX EXCHANGETRADE is a shell company, it may serve purposes such as:
Facilitating fraud by collecting deposits and disappearing.
Obscuring ownership to evade regulatory scrutiny.
Misrepresenting operations to attract investors under false pretenses.
Tactics to Watch For:
Use of unrelated registration numbers to claim legitimacy (e.g., Companies House number 09914444).
Temporary or non-functional websites to create a facade of operations.
Lack of verifiable contact details, such as physical addresses or phone numbers.
Verification Challenges: The lack of a website and operational details makes it difficult to confirm FX EXCHANGETRADE’s existence beyond its FCA warning. This obscurity is a hallmark of shell companies.

13. Conclusion ¶

FX EXCHANGETRADE exhibits multiple red flags consistent with a fraudulent operation and potential shell company:

Unregulated and Blacklisted: The FCA has explicitly warned against it for unauthorized operations.
False Claims: Its claim of a $5.5 trillion daily trading volume and Companies House registration is unverifiable and misleading.
Lack of Transparency: No website, social media presence, or operational details are available, raising suspicions of a shell company.
High Risk: The combination of a newly registered domain, lack of regulatory oversight, and potential clone firm tactics indicates significant risk to investors. Recommendation: Avoid FX EXCHANGETRADE entirely. Investors should prioritize regulated brokers with transparent operations, verifiable regulatory licenses, and established reputations. If you’ve already engaged with this entity, report it to the FCA or relevant authorities and seek legal advice to recover funds.

14. Sources ¶

BrokersView: FX EXCHANGETRADE Review 2025.
FCA Warning: fx-exchangetrade (April 7, 2022). Available at fca.org.uk/news/warnings/fx-exchangetrade.

Note: Due to the lack of a website and limited information, some analyses (e.g., website security, IP hosting) could not be performed. If you obtain a website URL or additional details, please provide them for a more detailed assessment. Always exercise extreme caution with entities exhibiting these characteristics, especially potential shell companies.