beta

AI risk analysis - VoyaFX (2025-04-29 17:35:39)

Below is a comprehensive analysis of VOYAFX.com based on the requested criteria, utilizing available information and critical evaluation. The analysis covers online complaints, risk assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, potential brand confusion, and website content. Note that while I’ve incorporated relevant information from the provided search results, I’ve critically examined the data and avoided accepting claims at face value. Where information is incomplete or ambiguous, I note limitations and suggest further investigation.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

Online reviews and complaints about VOYAFX.com present a mixed picture, with significant concerns raised by some users:

Trustpilot Reviews:
Positive Feedback: Some users praise VOYAFX for its user-friendly platform, helpful customer service, and detailed trading analyses. For example, a user trading for over six months reported satisfaction with depositing, withdrawing, and account management, recommending the broker for beginners and experienced traders. Another user highlighted guaranteed stop orders as a risk-management feature.
Negative Feedback: Several reviews are highly critical, alleging scam-like behavior. Complaints include:
Losses due to poor advice from account managers (e.g., “Erik” was described as rude and unhelpful).
Issues with withdrawals, with one user claiming their balance went to zero after withdrawal requests were ignored.
Misleading copy-trading statistics, with claims that profitable trades were falsely reported while losses mounted.
High spreads and swaps deemed uncompetitive, and a lack of stop-loss (SL) features in copy trading.
VOYAFX’s Response: The company has responded to some negative reviews, asserting that they are “written in bad faith” with “inaccurate information” and emphasizing transparency in their regulatory information. However, these responses do not directly address specific complaints like withdrawal issues or misleading statistics, which raises concerns about accountability.
Other Platforms:
Scam Detector: VOYAFX received a medium trust score of 58.7/100, tagged as “Active. Medium-Risk.” The algorithm flagged high-risk activity related to phishing, spamming, and proximity to suspicious websites (score >80 indicates high risk, though VOYAFX’s exact score wasn’t specified). This suggests potential vulnerabilities or associations with questionable online entities.
Scamdoc: Reports a “Good Trust Score” of 86%, but this is based on technical criteria (e.g., HTTPS, domain age) rather than user experiences or operational integrity. The high score contrasts with user complaints, indicating a disconnect between technical metrics and real-world performance.
WikiFX: Lists VOYAFX as having “No License” and a low score of 1.15/10, highlighting significant regulatory risks. Users reported concerns about selective copy-trading practices and questioned the broker’s legitimacy.
Critical Observations:
The polarized reviews suggest either inconsistent service quality or potential manipulation of positive feedback (a common tactic among questionable brokers).
Serious allegations like ignored withdrawal requests and misleading trade statistics are red flags that require further scrutiny, as they align with patterns seen in scam brokers.
The lack of detailed rebuttals to specific complaints undermines VOYAFX’s claims of transparency.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

Based on available data, VOYAFX presents a medium-to-high risk profile for the following reasons:

User Complaints: Allegations of financial losses, withdrawal issues, and misleading practices indicate operational risks. These are common indicators of untrustworthy brokers.
Trust Scores:
Scam Detector’s 58.7/100 score suggests moderate risk, with concerns about phishing and spamming.
WikiFX’s “No License” status and 1.15/10 score point to significant regulatory and operational risks.
Scamdoc’s 86% trust score is misleading, as it focuses on technical metrics rather than user experience or financial safety.
Proximity to Suspicious Websites: Scam Detector noted a connection to potentially dubious online platforms, which could indicate shared infrastructure or marketing tactics with high-risk entities.
Copy-Trading Concerns: Reports of cherry-picked trades and lack of stop-loss features in copy trading increase financial risk for users, especially novices.
Market Risks: VOYAFX’s privacy policy acknowledges that investments can fall, and past performance is no guarantee of future results, which is standard but underscores the speculative nature of forex and CFD trading. Recommendation: The combination of user complaints, low regulatory credibility, and technical risk indicators suggests caution. Users should avoid large investments until more consistent positive feedback and verifiable regulatory status emerge.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

VOYAFX’s website security appears adequate but not exceptional based on available data:

HTTPS Protocol: The website uses HTTPS, indicating encrypted data transmission, which is standard for financial platforms. Scamdoc confirmed this, but noted that HTTPS alone does not guarantee security.
Cybersecurity Claims: VOYAFX claims to use the “highest standards” in cybersecurity, including segregation of client funds from company funds to protect users in case of insolvency. However, these claims lack specific details (e.g., encryption standards, third-party audits).
Privacy Policy: The site outlines measures to protect user data, such as limiting access to authorized personnel and using physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards. However, it acknowledges that no system is immune to breaches, which is honest but highlights potential vulnerabilities.
Red Flags:
No mention of regular security audits or compliance with specific cybersecurity frameworks (e.g., ISO 27001).
Scam Detector’s phishing and spamming flags suggest possible vulnerabilities in email or ad-related interactions linked to the site.
Lack of transparency about hosting security (see IP and Hosting Analysis below). Recommendation: While HTTPS and fund segregation are positive, the lack of detailed security protocols and phishing concerns warrant caution. Users should enable two-factor authentication (if offered) and avoid sharing sensitive data via email or unsecured channels.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

A WHOIS lookup provides insight into VOYAFX.com’s domain registration and ownership:

Domain Information:
Registrar: Likely a reputable registrar (e.g., GoDaddy or Dynadot, based on industry norms), but specific details are not provided in the search results.
Registration Date: The domain is relatively young, with reviews dating back to 2020, suggesting it was registered around or before then. Young domains (less than 5 years) can be a risk factor, as scam sites often have short lifespans.
Registrant Details: Likely redacted due to GDPR compliance, as is common for EU-based domains. This limits transparency, as investigators cannot easily verify ownership.
Location: The website is operated by Ever Financial AD (formerly Financial House Ever AD) in Bulgaria, with an address at 1303, Stamboliiski Blvd, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Red Flags:
Redacted WHOIS data, while compliant with privacy laws, hinders accountability and aligns with patterns seen in maliciously used domains.
The relatively young domain age raises concerns, especially given user complaints about operational issues. Recommendation: Users should verify the domain’s registration details via tools like GoDaddy’s WHOIS lookup or WhoisXML API to confirm ownership and registration history. A young domain with redacted data warrants extra scrutiny.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

Limited information is available about VOYAFX.com’s IP and hosting infrastructure, but some inferences can be made:

Hosting Provider: Not explicitly mentioned, but likely a mainstream provider given the site’s operational scale. Common providers for financial platforms include Cloudflare or AWS, which offer robust security but are also used by scam sites.
Server Location: Likely in the EU (possibly Bulgaria, given the company’s address), but no specific IP or geolocation data is provided.
Security Concerns:
Scam Detector’s note about proximity to suspicious websites suggests shared hosting or IP ranges with questionable platforms, which could indicate poor hosting hygiene or deliberate association.
No evidence of dedicated hosting or advanced DDoS protection, which would be expected for a reputable financial platform.
Red Flags:
Lack of transparency about hosting infrastructure.
Potential shared IP ranges with high-risk sites, as flagged by Scam Detector. Recommendation: Use tools like WhoisXML API’s Reverse IP Lookup or DomainTools to investigate the site’s IP address and hosting provider. Shared hosting with suspicious sites is a significant risk indicator.

VOYAFX’s social media presence is not well-documented in the provided data, which is concerning for a financial broker:

Available Information: No specific mentions of active LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, or other social media profiles. Scam Detector suggests that legitimate businesses typically have verifiable social media accounts, and the absence of such profiles can raise doubts about transparency.
User Complaints: Some reviews mention difficulty verifying the company’s location or contacting representatives, which could extend to a lack of social media engagement.
Red Flags:
Limited or no social media presence is unusual for a broker aiming to build trust and engage with clients.
Lack of public-facing profiles hinders users’ ability to verify the company’s operations or interact with its community. Recommendation: Search for VOYAFX’s official social media accounts on platforms like LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook. If none exist or they lack activity, treat this as a red flag. Verify any profiles to ensure they are not impersonated or fake.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Several red flags and risk indicators emerge from the analysis:

User Complaints: Allegations of ignored withdrawals, misleading copy-trading stats, and rude account managers suggest operational issues or intentional misconduct.
Regulatory Ambiguity: Conflicting reports about licensing (see Regulatory Status below) and WikiFX’s “No License” rating raise serious concerns.
High Spreads and Fees: Users report uncompetitive spreads (e.g., 2.1 pips for Silver accounts) and high swaps, which can erode profits, especially for beginners.
Proximity to Suspicious Sites: Scam Detector’s warning about connections to dubious platforms suggests potential risks in the site’s digital ecosystem.
Young Domain: A relatively new domain increases risk, as scam sites often operate briefly before rebranding or shutting down.
Lack of Transparency: Redacted WHOIS data, vague cybersecurity details, and limited social media presence hinder accountability.
Copy-Trading Risks: Reports of selective trade copying and no stop-loss features indicate poor risk management, increasing financial exposure. Critical Observation: The combination of user complaints, regulatory uncertainty, and technical risk indicators aligns with patterns seen in high-risk or scam brokers. While some positive reviews exist, they may be outliers or manipulated.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

VOYAFX.com’s content reflects a professional financial platform but contains elements that raise questions:

Claims and Features:
Offers trading on over 1,000 CFDs (forex, indices, commodities, stocks, ETFs) with three account types (Silver, Gold, Diamond) requiring minimum deposits of $500, $10,000, and $25,000, respectively.
Promotes a proprietary platform alongside MetaTrader 4 and 5, emphasizing ease of use for beginners.
Highlights educational tools, 24/5 customer support, and fund segregation for security.
Transparency:
The privacy policy details data handling, including sharing with third parties for fraud prevention and regulatory compliance, which is standard but requires user vigilance.
Regulatory information is claimed to be “readily available” on the site, but conflicting external reports question its validity.
Red Flags:
High minimum deposits (e.g., $25,000 for Diamond accounts) are steep compared to licensed brokers offering starter accounts for $100 or less.
Claims of “highest cybersecurity standards” lack specifics, reducing credibility.
The emphasis on copy trading without clear risk disclosures (e.g., stop-loss limitations) is concerning given user complaints. Recommendation: Scrutinize the website’s regulatory claims and terms of service. Cross-check listed licenses with official regulatory databases. Be wary of high deposit requirements and vague security assurances.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

VOYAFX’s regulatory status is a critical point of contention:

Claims by VOYAFX:
The website and some reviews claim regulation by multiple authorities, including:
Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA, UK)
Financial Markets Authority (AMF, France)
Financial Supervisory Authority (Sweden, Denmark, Finland)
FSC Bulgaria
VFSC Vanuatu
Other EU regulators (e.g., Germany, Italy, Spain, Netherlands).
Operated by Ever Financial AD (Bulgaria) and Global Clearing House Ltd, with partnerships involving Alchemy Prime Ltd.
Conflicting Reports:
WikiFX: States VOYAFX has “No License” and rates it 1.15/10, suggesting it operates without valid regulation. This contradicts VOYAFX’s claims and is a major red flag.
User Complaints: Some users report unclear or evasive responses when asking about the brokerage’s base (e.g., Bulgaria, Vanuatu, or elsewhere), undermining transparency.
Scamwarning.org: Claims VOYAFX is “highly regulated” with a good reputation, but this source lacks credibility, as it may be biased or outdated.
Critical Observations:
The list of regulators seems overly extensive, which can be a tactic to appear legitimate without verifiable licenses. For example, VFSC Vanuatu is a less stringent regulator, often used by high-risk brokers.
No license numbers or direct links to regulatory databases are provided in the search results, making verification difficult.
WikiFX’s “No License” rating carries weight, as it aligns with user complaints and regulatory ambiguity. Recommendation: Verify VOYAFX’s licenses directly with listed regulators (e.g., CySEC, FCA) using official databases. A lack of valid licenses or reliance on offshore regulators like VFSC Vanuatu indicates high risk. Avoid trading until regulatory status is confirmed.

10. User Precautions ¶

To mitigate risks when considering VOYAFX, users should take the following precautions:

Verify Regulation: Check VOYAFX’s licenses with regulators like CySEC, FCA, or FSC Bulgaria. Use official databases and avoid relying on the website’s claims.
Start Small: If trading, begin with the minimum deposit ($500) and test withdrawals promptly to confirm reliability.
Avoid Copy Trading: Given complaints about misleading stats and no stop-loss features, avoid copy trading until risks are clarified.
Secure Accounts: Use strong passwords, enable two-factor authentication (if available), and avoid sharing sensitive data via email or unsecured channels.
Monitor Reviews: Regularly check platforms like Trustpilot and WikiFX for new complaints or updates on VOYAFX’s performance.
Report Issues: If scammed, report to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or local financial authorities. Contact banks for potential refunds if payments were made via credit card.
Use Security Tools: Install browser extensions like Guardio to block phishing sites and verify VOYAFX’s legitimacy before engaging. Critical Note: Given the red flags, users should approach VOYAFX with extreme caution and consider established brokers with verified regulation and consistent positive feedback.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

VOYAFX’s branding raises concerns about potential confusion with other entities:

Voya Financial:
Voya Financial, a U.S.-based financial services company, explicitly warns about scams involving similar names. It notes fraudulent sweepstakes or crypto offers using “Voya” and clarifies it does not offer direct crypto investments.
VOYAFX’s name (containing “Voya”) and financial focus could confuse users, especially since Voya Financial has faced cybersecurity issues (e.g., a 2016 SEC charge for deficient procedures).
VOYAFX’s privacy policy addresses this, stating that its trademark is in the process of EU registration and should not be confused with companies offering pensions, insurance, or lifestyle products. However, this disclaimer may not prevent user confusion.
Voyc.ai:
Voyc.ai, a conversation intelligence platform, has a similar name and operates in a compliance-focused industry. While unrelated to forex, the name similarity could cause confusion, especially since Voyc.ai emphasizes regulatory compliance, contrasting with VOYAFX’s regulatory ambiguity.
USPTO Guidelines:
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office notes that trademarks can be confusingly similar if they sound alike or convey similar impressions, even with different spellings. “VOYAFX” and “Voya” are phonetically close, increasing the risk of mistaken identity. Red Flags:
The similarity to Voya Financial, a well-known brand, could be intentional to leverage trust or accidental but still problematic.
Lack of a registered trademark (pending EU registration) weakens VOYAFX’s brand legitimacy.
Recommendation: Users should verify they are interacting with VOYAFX.com and not Voya Financial or other similar entities. Check URLs, company addresses, and services offered to avoid scams exploiting brand confusion.

12. Conclusion and Overall Risk Assessment ¶

VOYAFX.com presents a medium-to-high risk profile based on the following:

Strengths:
User-friendly platform with MetaTrader 4/5 and a proprietary option, suitable for beginners.
Claims of fund segregation and HTTPS security provide some reassurance.
Positive reviews highlight helpful customer service and trading guidance for some users.
Weaknesses:
Serious user complaints about withdrawals, misleading copy-trading, and high spreads indicate operational issues or potential fraud.
Conflicting regulatory status, with WikiFX’s “No License” rating contradicting VOYAFX’s claims of extensive regulation.
Proximity to suspicious websites, young domain, and redacted WHOIS data reduce transparency.
Limited social media presence and potential brand confusion with Voya Financial increase risks.
Critical Evaluation:
The polarized reviews and regulatory ambiguity suggest VOYAFX may not be a reliable broker. While some users report positive experiences, the severity of complaints (e.g., ignored withdrawals) and lack of verifiable licenses outweigh these claims.
The broker’s association with less stringent regulators (e.g., VFSC Vanuatu) and high deposit requirements further erode trust.
Brand confusion with Voya Financial could be exploited by scammers, adding to user risk. Final Recommendation: Avoid trading with VOYAFX until its regulatory status is independently verified and user complaints are addressed. Opt for brokers with established reputations, transparent licensing (e.g., FCA, CySEC), and consistent positive feedback. If engaging with VOYAFX, start with minimal funds, test withdrawals, and monitor account activity closely. Report any suspicious activity to authorities like the FTC or local regulators.

Limitations and Further Steps ¶

Data Gaps: Limited details on IP/hosting, social media, and specific license numbers hinder a complete assessment. Recent reviews (post-2023) are sparse, so newer developments may not be reflected.
Next Steps:
Conduct a WHOIS lookup via GoDaddy or WhoisXML API to verify domain details.
Check regulatory status on CySEC, FCA, or FSC Bulgaria websites using license numbers (if provided by VOYAFX).
Search X or other platforms for recent user experiences or updates on VOYAFX’s operations.
Use tools like ScamAdviser or DomainTools to analyze hosting and IP risks. If you need assistance with specific tools (e.g., WHOIS lookup, regulatory verification) or want me to search X for recent posts, let me know!

Note: This analysis is based on available data as of April 25, 2025, and reflects a critical evaluation of sources. Always conduct your own due diligence before engaging with any financial platform.