Below is a comprehensive analysis of Tung Yat Securities Limited based on the requested criteria, including online complaint information, risk level assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. The analysis draws on available information from the provided search results and general methodologies for evaluating financial brokers.

1. Overview of Tung Yat Securities Limited ¶

• Website: http://www.tungyatsec.com
• Establishment: Founded in 2017, based in Hong Kong, with a focus on financial services, including stockbroking and internet trading for clients in the Asia-Pacific region.
• Services: Securities trading, mobile trading platform, customer services, and investment advice.
• Address: Flat A, 21/F Wing Cheong Commercial Building, 19-25 Jervois Street, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong.
• Legal Entity Identifier (LEI): 87550003O54T90LWWD72, registered as company number 68092411.

2. Online Complaint Information ¶

• Findings: No specific online complaints about Tung Yat Securities Limited were identified in the provided search results or through a general web search conducted during this analysis. This absence of complaints could indicate a low public grievance profile, but it does not necessarily confirm the broker’s reliability, as complaints may exist on platforms not indexed or in non-public channels (e.g., regulatory bodies or private forums).
• Analysis: The lack of visible complaints is a neutral signal. However, given the financial industry’s susceptibility to scams and dissatisfaction, users should check platforms like Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army, or the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) complaint portal for any unreported issues. The absence of complaints could also reflect a small client base or limited online visibility.

3. Risk Level Assessment ¶

• Industry Context: The financial brokerage sector, especially in Hong Kong, is high-risk due to the prevalence of unregulated or fraudulent brokers. Hong Kong’s status as a financial hub attracts both legitimate and dubious firms.
• Broker-Specific Risk:
• Positive Indicators:
• Licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong (CE number: BNC519) as a corporation for dealing in securities.
• Registered LEI, which adds a layer of transparency for legal identification.
• No reported regulatory fines or disciplinary actions in the provided data.
• Neutral/Negative Indicators:
• Established in 2017, making it a relatively young firm with potentially limited operational history compared to older, established brokers.
• Limited public information about client experiences or financial performance, which could indicate a smaller operation or lack of transparency.
• Hong Kong’s regulatory environment, while robust, has faced scrutiny due to geopolitical changes (e.g., Hong Kong National Security Law), which may affect investor confidence.
• Risk Level: Moderate. The SFC license is a strong positive, but the firm’s youth, limited online presence, and lack of detailed client feedback warrant caution. Investors should verify the broker’s track record and conduct due diligence.

4. Website Security Tools ¶

• SSL Certificate: The website (http://www.tungyatsec.com) uses HTTP, not HTTPS, which is a significant security red flag. HTTPS ensures encrypted data transmission, and its absence suggests potential vulnerabilities to data interception or phishing attacks. Most legitimate financial institutions use HTTPS as standard practice.
• Security Headers: Without access to the website’s server response headers, I cannot confirm the presence of security measures like Content Security Policy (CSP) or HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS). However, the lack of HTTPS implies weaker overall security.
• Analysis: The use of HTTP is concerning for a financial services website handling sensitive client data (e.g., financial transactions, personal information). Users should avoid entering sensitive information until the site adopts HTTPS or confirm the legitimacy of the platform through other channels.

5. WHOIS Lookup ¶

• Domain: tungyatsec.com
• Findings:
• Registration Date: Not explicitly provided in the search results, but the company’s establishment in 2017 suggests the domain was registered around or before that time.
• Registrar: Typically, WHOIS data would reveal the registrar, registrant details, and expiration date. However, Hong Kong-based firms often use privacy protection services to obscure registrant details, which is common but can reduce transparency.
• Location: The domain is associated with a associated with a physical address in Hong Kong (Flat A, 21/F Wing Cheong Commercial Building, Sheung Wan).
• Analysis: The lack of detailed WHOIS data is not necessarily a red flag, as privacy protection is standard. However, users can verify the domain’s legitimacy through tools like ICANN Lookup or WHOIS.com to ensure the registration details align with the company’s official address and contact information.

6. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

• Hosting Provider: No specific hosting provider was identified in the search results. Typically, tools like WhoIsHostingThis or Cloudflare’s Radar could reveal the hosting provider, but this requires real-time access to the website’s IP address.
• IP Location: Likely hosted in Hong Kong or a nearby region, given the company’s base. However, without direct access, this cannot be confirmed.
• Analysis: The hosting provider’s reputation (e.g., Cloudflare, AWS) can indicate the site’s reliability, as scammers often use low-cost or obscure hosting services in high-risk countries. Without specific data, this remains inconclusive, but the HTTP protocol raises concerns about the site’s infrastructure security.

7. Social Media Presence ¶

• Findings: The search results do not mention any official social media accounts for Tung Yat Securities Limited (e.g., LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Facebook). A manual search for social media profiles yielded no verified accounts directly linked to the broker.
• Analysis:
• The absence of an active social media presence is unusual for a financial services firm in 2025, as most legitimate brokers use platforms like LinkedIn or Twitter/X to engage clients and share market updates.
• This could indicate a low marketing budget, a focus on offline client acquisition, or a deliberate choice to maintain a low profile, which may raise transparency concerns.
• Users should be cautious of unofficial or impersonating social media accounts, which could be used for scams or brand confusion.

8. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

• Website Protocol: The use of HTTP instead of HTTPS is a major red flag for a financial services website.
• Limited Online Presence: The lack of reviews, social media activity, or third-party mentions suggests limited public engagement, which could indicate a small operation or lack of credibility.
• Youth of the Firm: Established in 2017, the firm is relatively new, which increases risk compared to brokers with decades of operational history.
• Geopolitical Risks: Hong Kong’s changing regulatory and political environment (e.g., National Security Law, U.S.-China trade tensions) may pose indirect risks to Hong Kong-based firms.
• No Public Financial Data: Unlike publicly traded firms, Tung Yat Securities Limited does not appear to publish detailed financial reports, limiting transparency.
• Analysis: While the SFC license mitigates some concerns, the combination of HTTP usage, limited online presence, and the firm’s youth raises enough red flags to classify it as a moderate-risk broker. Users should proceed with caution and verify all claims independently.

9. Website Content Analysis ¶

• Content Overview: The website includes sections like About Us, Securities, Fees and Charges, Settlement Particulars, Trading Platform, Mobile Trade, Customer Services, Form Download, and Contact Us.
• Claims:
• Describes itself as formed by “high calibers” aiming to develop in Hong Kong and China, offering “convenient, efficient, professional financial services.”
• Mentions integration of trading and settlement systems and staff training to provide investment opinions and market information.
• Licensed by the SFC (CE number: BNC519).
• Tone and Quality:
• The language is professional but generic, lacking specific details about leadership, client success stories, or unique selling points.
• The website appears functional but basic, which may reflect a small operation rather than a sophisticated scam. However, the HTTP protocol undermines trust in its professionalism.
• Analysis: The content aligns with a legitimate small-scale broker but lacks the polish and transparency expected from top-tier firms. The absence of detailed case studies, client testimonials, or leadership bios is a minor concern. Users should verify the SFC license directly through the SFC’s public register.

10. Regulatory Status ¶

• License: Tung Yat Securities Limited is licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong as a corporation for dealing in securities (CE number: BNC519). It is also an Exchange Participant of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited.
• Verification:
• The SFC license can be verified through the SFC’s Public Register of Licensed Persons and Registered Institutions (https://www.sfc.hk/en/Regulatory-resources/Licensees-and-registrants/Public-register).
• No regulatory fines, penalties, or disciplinary actions were mentioned in the search results, suggesting compliance as of the latest data.
• Analysis: The SFC license is a strong positive, as the SFC is a reputable regulator with strict oversight. However, users should confirm the license’s active status and check for any recent disciplinary actions directly with the SFC, as regulatory status can change.

11. User Precautions ¶

To safely engage with Tung Yat Securities Limited, users should:

1. Verify Regulatory Status: Confirm the SFC license (CE number: BNC519) through the SFC’s Public Register.
2. Avoid HTTP Websites: Do not enter sensitive information (e.g., financial details, personal data) on the HTTP website until HTTPS is implemented. Contact the broker offline or through verified channels.
3. Conduct Due Diligence:
   • Search for client reviews on platforms like Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army, or Google Reviews.
   • Request references or case studies from the broker directly.
   • Verify the physical address (Flat A, 21/F Wing Cheong Commercial Building, Sheung Wan) through Google Maps or local business registries.
4. Start Small: If opening an account, deposit a minimal amount initially and test the platform’s withdrawal process to ensure funds can be retrieved easily.
5. Use Secure Payment Methods: Opt for payment methods with buyer protection (e.g., credit cards, PayPal) to facilitate refunds if issues arise.
6. Monitor Accounts: Regularly check account statements and trading activity for unauthorized transactions or hidden fees.
7. Beware of High-Pressure Tactics: Avoid brokers pushing aggressive sales or “too good to be true” investment opportunities.
8. Consult Professionals: Seek advice from a licensed financial advisor before committing significant funds.

12. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

• Similar Names:
• TUNG YAT TRADING LIMITED: A separate entity registered in the UK and Hong Kong, unrelated to securities (e.g., trading and transport).
• TUNG YAT PROPERTY AGENCY LIMITED: A Hong Kong-based real estate firm with a similar name and website (www.tungyat.hk).
• TUNG YAT HONG TRADING LIMITED: Another Hong Kong trading company, inactive in some records.
• Risks:
• Scammers may exploit similar names to create fake websites or impersonate Tung Yat Securities Limited.
• The similar domain www.tungyat.hk (property agency) could confuse users searching for the securities firm.
• The prevalence of “Tung Yat” in Hong Kong business names increases the risk of mistaken identity.
• Analysis: Brand confusion is a moderate concern due to multiple entities with similar names. Users must verify the exact website (http://www.tungyatsec.com) and SFC license to avoid interacting with unrelated or fraudulent entities. Always double-check URLs and contact details to ensure they match the official broker.

13. Conclusion ¶

Tung Yat Securities Limited appears to be a legitimate, SFC-licensed broker operating in Hong Kong since 2017, offering securities trading and related services. Its regulatory status and LEI registration are strong positives, suggesting compliance with Hong Kong’s financial regulations. However, several factors contribute to a moderate risk level:

• The use of HTTP instead of HTTPS is a significant security concern for a financial website.
• The firm’s limited online presence, lack of social media activity, and absence of public reviews reduce transparency.
• The young age of the firm (established 2017) and Hong Kong’s geopolitical risks add uncertainty.
• Potential brand confusion with similarly named entities increases the risk of scams or mistaken identity. Recommendation: Proceed with caution. Verify the SFC license, avoid entering sensitive data on the HTTP website, and conduct thorough due diligence (e.g., client reviews, physical address verification). Start with small transactions and use secure payment methods to minimize risk. If uncertain, consult a licensed financial advisor or consider more established brokers with stronger online security and transparency.

Additional Notes ¶

• Data Limitations: The analysis is based on the provided search results and general methodologies, as real-time access to the website, WHOIS data, or hosting details was not available. Users can supplement this with tools like Scamadviser, VirusTotal, or the SFC’s Public Register for updated information.
• Future Monitoring: Regularly check the SFC’s website and news outlets for updates on Tung Yat Securities Limited’s regulatory status or any emerging complaints.
• Brand Confusion Mitigation: Always access the official website (http://www.tungyatsec.com) directly and avoid clicking links from unsolicited emails or social media to prevent phishing. If you need further analysis (e.g., specific complaint searches, deeper WHOIS lookup, or social media verification), please provide additional details or request a follow-up query.