Below is a comprehensive analysis of Meta Transaction (https://metatransaction.org/) based on the requested criteria, including online complaint information, risk level assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, potential risk indicators, website content analysis, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. The analysis incorporates available information from web sources and critical evaluation of the platform.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

• Complaints and User Feedback:
• Multiple sources flag Meta Transaction as a fraudulent platform. A significant complaint is the inability of users to withdraw funds after depositing large sums, often accompanied by requests for additional fees, a hallmark of scam operations.
• Gridinsoft reports that metatransaction.org is classified as a fake investment/earning website, with anti-malware software blocking access due to its deceptive practices.
• Trustpilot shows a 4-star rating based on 18 reviews, but the authenticity of these reviews is questionable, as scam platforms often use fabricated testimonials.
• No specific complaints are detailed on Reclame Aqui, but the site encourages users to check the reputation of metatransaction.org, suggesting caution.
• Critical Observation: The presence of withdrawal issues and fabricated reviews strongly suggests fraudulent intent. Legitimate brokers typically have transparent complaint resolution processes and verifiable user feedback.

---

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

• High-Risk Indicators:
• Fraudulent Practices: Meta Transaction is explicitly labeled a scam by BrokersView and Gridinsoft due to its deceptive tactics, such as promising guaranteed returns with no risk, which is unrealistic in legitimate trading.
• Recent Domain Registration: The domain was registered 7 months ago (as of June 2024), indicating a lack of established credibility. New domains are often associated with scam operations.
• Lack of Transparency: Minimal information is provided about the platform’s operations, ownership, or team, which is a red flag for legitimacy.
• Risk Level: High. The combination of withdrawal issues, deceptive promises, and lack of transparency places Meta Transaction in a high-risk category for potential financial loss and exploitation.

---

3. Website Security Tools ¶

• Security Analysis:
• WordPress CMS: The site uses WordPress, a widely used content management system. However, WordPress sites can be vulnerable to data breaches if not properly secured with updated plugins and robust security measures.
• Anti-Malware Blocking: Gridinsoft Anti-Malware blocks metatransaction.org, indicating potential malicious content or phishing risks.
• SSL/TLS: While not explicitly mentioned, most modern websites use SSL. However, even scam sites often employ SSL to appear legitimate, so this alone is not a reliable indicator of security.
• Critical Observation: The use of WordPress without evidence of robust security measures, combined with anti-malware blocking, suggests the site may pose risks to user data and privacy.

---

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

• Domain Information:
• Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd.
• Registration Date: Approximately 7 months ago (circa November 2023, based on June 2024 data).
• Owner: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY, a common practice but often used by scam sites to hide ownership.
• Contact: Email ([email protected]) and phone (+85.253096991) provided for complaints, but no physical address or verifiable company details.
• Critical Observation: Redacted ownership and a recent registration date are red flags, as legitimate brokers typically provide transparent ownership details and have established domains.

---

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

• Hosting Details:
• Specific IP and hosting provider details are not provided in the sources. However, scam sites often use shared hosting or providers in jurisdictions with lax regulations to obscure their operations.
• The lack of transparency about hosting infrastructure aligns with the platform’s overall opacity.
• Critical Observation: Without verifiable hosting information, it’s difficult to assess the platform’s infrastructure. Scam sites often use low-cost or offshore hosting to evade detection.

---

6. Social Media Presence ¶

• Social Media Analysis:
• No specific details are provided about Meta Transaction’s social media accounts. Gridinsoft notes a likely absence of significant social media feedback due to the site’s recent creation.
• BrokersView reports that testimonials and reviews on Meta Transaction’s website and social media appear fabricated, often using stock images or fake names.
• Critical Observation: The lack of a verifiable social media presence and the use of fake testimonials are strong indicators of a scam. Legitimate brokers maintain active, transparent social media accounts with genuine user engagement.

---

7. Red Flags ¶

• Key Red Flags:
• Withdrawal Issues: Users report inability to access funds, a common tactic in scams.
• False Promises: Claims of guaranteed returns with no risk are unrealistic and typical of fraudulent schemes.
• Fabricated Testimonials: Reviews and testimonials appear fake, undermining credibility.
• Recent Domain: A 7-month-old domain suggests a lack of established reputation.
• Anti-Malware Blocking: The site is flagged by security software, indicating potential malicious intent.
• Critical Observation: These red flags collectively point to a high likelihood of fraudulent activity, as they align with common characteristics of scam platforms.

---

8. Potential Risk Indicators ¶

• Indicators:
• Deceptive Marketing: The site uses tactics to lure users with promises of high returns, a common scam strategy.
• Lack of Regulation: No verifiable regulatory oversight, a major risk for investors.
• Phishing Potential: The site’s classification as a fake investment platform suggests it may engage in phishing or data theft.
• Financial Loss: Users risk losing deposited funds due to reported withdrawal issues.
• Critical Observation: The combination of deceptive marketing, lack of regulation, and reported financial losses indicates significant risks to users.

---

9. Website Content Analysis ¶

• Content Overview:
• The website claims Meta Transaction is a leading forex broker with multiple global regulations, including an ASIC license under OTCPAY PTY LTD (AFS Number 001306248) and an MSB license. It emphasizes integrity, advanced technology, and a customer-first approach.
• The site promotes forex trading opportunities, claiming to offer a wide range of assets and generous trading conditions.
• Critical Evaluation:
• Regulatory Claims: The ASIC license claim requires verification, as scam sites often fabricate or misuse regulatory credentials. No evidence confirms the MSB license or OTCPAY PTY LTD’s connection to Meta Transaction.
• Generic Content: The emphasis on “integrity” and “advanced technology” is vague and lacks specific, verifiable details, a common trait of scam websites.
• Deceptive Promises: Promises of high returns and a “trillion-dollar market” are exaggerated and designed to attract unsuspecting investors.
• Critical Observation: The website’s content is polished but lacks substance and verifiable details. Claims of regulation and success are likely fabricated to build false trust.

---

10. Regulatory Status ¶

• Claimed Regulation:
• Meta Transaction claims to hold an ASIC license (AFS Number 001306248) under OTCPAY PTY LTD and an MSB license.
• Verification:
• ASIC License: No public records confirm that OTCPAY PTY LTD is associated with metatransaction.org. ASIC’s register should be checked directly to verify this claim, as scam platforms often misuse legitimate company details.
• MSB License: MSB licenses (e.g., from FinCEN in the U.S.) are for money services businesses, not necessarily forex brokers. No evidence verifies this claim.
• Lack of Oversight: BrokersView explicitly states that Meta Transaction lacks regulation from reputable bodies like the FCA or SEC, a major red flag.
• Critical Observation: The claimed regulatory status is likely fabricated or unverified. Legitimate brokers are transparent about their regulatory licenses and provide verifiable details.

---

11. User Precautions ¶

• Recommended Precautions:
• Avoid Investment: Do not deposit funds with Meta Transaction due to reported withdrawal issues and scam allegations.
• Verify Regulation: Check ASIC’s official register or other regulatory bodies (e.g., FCA, SEC) to confirm any licensing claims before engaging.
• Use Anti-Malware: Install and update anti-malware software to protect against potential phishing or malicious content on the site.
• Research Thoroughly: Read independent reviews on platforms like BrokersView, Gridinsoft, or WikiFX, and avoid relying on Trustpilot due to potential fake reviews.
• Limit Exposure: If testing the platform, invest only what you can afford to lose and avoid sharing sensitive personal or financial information.
• Report Suspicious Activity: Report the platform to financial authorities (e.g., ASIC, SEC) or consumer protection agencies if you encounter issues.
• Critical Observation: Users should exercise extreme caution and prioritize independent verification to avoid financial loss or data theft.

---

12. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

• Brand Name Analysis:
• Meta Transaction: The name resembles legitimate platforms like MetaTrader (a trusted trading platform) or MetaMask (a cryptocurrency wallet). This similarity may be intentional to confuse users.
• MetaTrader Confusion: MetaTrader is widely used in forex trading, and scam brokers often exploit its reputation. Meta Transaction’s name could mislead users into assuming a connection.
• MetaMask Confusion: The term “metatransaction” is used in blockchain contexts (e.g., MetaMask’s explanation of third-party transactions), potentially causing confusion with cryptocurrency users.
• Critical Observation: The platform likely uses its name to exploit brand recognition of MetaTrader or MetaMask, a deceptive tactic to gain trust. Users must distinguish Meta Transaction from these unrelated, legitimate platforms.

---

Conclusion ¶

Meta Transaction (https://metatransaction.org/) exhibits numerous red flags consistent with a fraudulent trading platform. Key findings include:

• Scam Allegations: Multiple sources (Gridinsoft, BrokersView) confirm its classification as a fake investment platform with reported withdrawal issues.
• High Risk: Recent domain registration, lack of transparency, and fabricated testimonials indicate significant financial and data risks.
• Unverified Regulation: Claims of ASIC and MSB licenses are likely false or unverifiable, undermining credibility.
• Deceptive Tactics: The site uses exaggerated promises, fake reviews, and potential brand confusion with MetaTrader/MetaMask to lure users.
• User Precautions: Avoid engaging with the platform, verify all claims independently, and use robust security measures. Recommendation: Do not invest or share personal information with Meta Transaction. Instead, use regulated brokers with verifiable credentials and transparent operations. If you’ve interacted with the platform, report it to relevant authorities (e.g., ASIC, SEC) and monitor your financial accounts for suspicious activity. Sources:
• Gridinsoft:
• BrokersView:
• Trustpilot:
• Reclame Aqui:
• Meta Transaction Website:
• MetaTrader/LinkedIn:
• MetaMask: If you need further assistance or specific checks (e.g., ASIC register lookup), let me know!