Atrade - AI risk analysis

beta

AI risk analysis - Atrade (2025-04-29 17:35:40)

Below is a comprehensive analysis of Atrade, based on the official website (https://www.atrade.co.il/) and available information, addressing online complaints, risk level assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. The analysis critically examines the provided data and avoids accepting unverified claims at face value.

1. Broker Overview ¶

Atrade is a financial brokerage firm registered in Israel, operating since 2007. It offers trading in Forex, Indices, Commodities, Stocks, and Bonds via MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and WebTrader platforms. Key features include:

Minimum Deposit: $100
Leverage: Up to 1:100
Spreads: Variable (e.g., 0.9 pips for EUR/USD)
Fees: $5 withdrawal fee, $50 inactivity fee after 3 months, $100 after one year
Instruments: Over 100 markets, including EUR/USD, US_500, and USD/ILS
Regulation: Claims to be regulated by the Israel Securities Authority (ISA) with Retail Forex License #514666577

2. Online Complaint Information ¶

Online complaints provide mixed feedback, with some positive reviews but significant concerns raised on platforms like Trustpilot and WikiFX:

Positive Feedback:
Some users praise Atrade for its diverse market instruments and advanced platforms (MT4 and WebTrader), describing a smooth and secure trading experience.
A review highlights satisfaction with fund security and automated systems.
Negative Feedback:
Withdrawal Issues: A user reported depositing $3,000 and earning $1,000 but being unable to withdraw funds, with no clear resolution.
Potential Scam Concerns: Complaints about related entities (e.g., Atrad.io) include website shutdowns, unprocessed withdrawals, and lack of communication, raising scam suspicions. For example, a user noted Atrad.io’s website became unavailable, and withdrawals were not honored, suggesting a Ponzi scheme.
Aggressive Practices: Reviews of similar-named brokers (e.g., A Trade International) report threatening behavior, falsified activity logs, and demands for additional deposits or taxes (e.g., 32% tax not disclosed initially).
Analysis:
The withdrawal complaints are concerning, as legitimate brokers typically process withdrawals promptly. Lack of communication and website downtime (for Atrad.io) are major red flags.
Complaints about A Trade International and Atrad.io may indicate brand confusion (see Section 11), but they raise doubts about the broader reputation of similar-named entities.

3. Risk Level Assessment ¶

Atrade’s risk level is evaluated based on its offerings, complaints, and operational transparency:

High Leverage (1:100):
High leverage amplifies both profits and losses, posing significant risk to inexperienced traders. Atrade’s leverage is relatively high compared to industry standards, requiring caution.
Inactivity Fees:
The $50 fee after 3 months and $100 after a year may catch users off guard, especially for dormant accounts.
Complaint Severity:
Withdrawal issues and scam allegations (e.g., Atrad.io) suggest moderate to high risk, particularly if Atrade’s operations mirror those of related entities.
Risk Rating: Moderate to High
While Atrade appears regulated, the high leverage, fees, and complaints about withdrawals and related entities elevate the risk. Traders should proceed with caution and verify fund security.

4. Website Security Tools ¶

The security of https://www.atrade.co.il/ is critical for user trust. Analysis includes:

SSL Certificate:
The website likely has a valid SSL certificate, as this is standard for financial platforms to secure data transmission. However, specific SSL details (e.g., type, issuer) are not provided in the data.
A free or low-level SSL certificate could be a red flag, as scammers sometimes use them, but no evidence suggests this for Atrade.co.il.
Security Features:
No explicit mention of two-factor authentication (2FA), encryption standards, or anti-phishing measures on the website. Legitimate brokers typically highlight such features.
The platform supports MT4 and WebTrader, which are secure if properly configured, but vulnerabilities could arise from outdated software or poor server security.
Analysis:
Without detailed security information, the website’s robustness is uncertain. Users should verify SSL status (e.g., via browser padlock) and inquire about additional protections before sharing sensitive data.

5. WHOIS Lookup ¶

A WHOIS lookup provides insights into domain ownership and transparency:

Domain: atrade.co.il
Registrar: Likely an Israeli registrar, given the .co.il TLD.
Registration Date: Not specified, but Atrade has operated since 2007, suggesting a long-standing domain.
Owner Information: WHOIS data for .co.il domains often includes owner details unless hidden by privacy protection. No evidence suggests the owner is concealed, which is positive for transparency.
Analysis:
A long-standing domain aligns with Atrade’s claimed history, reducing the likelihood of a fly-by-night operation. However, users should verify WHOIS data via tools like ICANN or local registrars to confirm ownership matches Atrade’s claimed identity.

6. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

IP and hosting details reveal the website’s infrastructure:

Hosting Location: Likely Israel, given Atrade’s registration and .co.il TLD. No specific IP or hosting provider data is provided.
Risk Indicators:
Hosting in high-risk countries (per the International Banking Federation) can be a red flag. Israel is not typically classified as high-risk, so this is not a concern.
Shared hosting or low-quality providers could indicate cost-cutting, but no evidence suggests this for Atrade.
Analysis:
Without specific IP/hosting data, assumptions are limited. Atrade’s Israeli base suggests reputable hosting, but users should use tools like SecurityTrails or VirusTotal to check for suspicious IP activity.

Social media activity reflects a broker’s engagement and reputation:

Instagram: Atrade has an Instagram account (atrade.il), but login is required to view content, limiting public access.
Other Platforms: No mention of active Twitter, Facebook, or LinkedIn profiles for Atrade.co.il. This is unusual for a broker, as legitimate firms typically maintain robust social media presence.
Red Flags:
Limited or inaccessible social media raises concerns about transparency and customer engagement.
Complaints about related entities (e.g., Atrad.io) mention fake LinkedIn profiles for executives, suggesting potential misrepresentation.
Analysis:
Atrade’s minimal social media presence is a moderate red flag. Legitimate brokers use social media for updates and client interaction. Users should verify any profiles and avoid platforms with unverified or private accounts.

8. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Several red flags and risk indicators emerge from the analysis:

Withdrawal Complaints: Reports of denied withdrawals are a significant concern, as they suggest potential liquidity issues or fraudulent practices.
High Leverage: The 1:100 leverage is risky for retail traders and may indicate aggressive marketing to inexperienced users.
Inactivity Fees: Undisclosed or high fees can erode account balances, catching users unaware.
Limited Transparency: Lack of detailed security information, social media engagement, or executive profiles reduces trust.
Related Entity Scams: Atrad.io and A Trade International are flagged as scams, with issues like website shutdowns and regulatory warnings. This raises concerns about Atrade’s operations or brand misuse.
Regulatory Ambiguity: While Atrade claims ISA regulation, complaints about related entities (e.g., Atrad.io’s false Mauritius regulation) suggest potential misrepresentation.

9. Website Content Analysis ¶

The content on https://www.atrade.co.il/ is not directly accessible in the provided data, but insights from related sources indicate:

Claims:
Atrade promotes a diverse instrument range, MT4/WebTrader platforms, and ISA regulation.
The website likely emphasizes innovation and safe trading, as per Crunchbase’s description.
Red Flags:
No mention of risk disclosures, educational resources, or detailed terms of service, which are standard for regulated brokers.
Related scam sites (e.g., astratt-us.com) use vague claims and grandiose promises, a tactic that could apply if Atrade’s content lacks substance.
Analysis:
The website’s content appears professional but may lack transparency if it omits risk warnings or regulatory details. Users should scrutinize terms, conditions, and risk disclosures before trading.

10. Regulatory Status ¶

Regulatory status is critical for assessing legitimacy:

Claimed Regulation:
Atrade is reportedly regulated by the Israel Securities Authority (ISA) with License #514666577, operating under Israeli laws.
ISA is a reputable regulator, suggesting oversight and investor protections.
Concerns:
Related entities like A Trade International are flagged as unregulated by the Belgian FSMA, indicating scam activity.
Atrad.io falsely claimed Mauritius regulation, which was debunked by authorities.
No independent verification of Atrade’s ISA license is provided in the data.
Analysis:
The claimed ISA regulation is a positive sign, but users must verify the license via the ISA’s official register (https://www.isa.gov.il/). Complaints about related entities suggest caution, as Atrade’s regulatory status could be misrepresented or confused with scam brokers.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

Atrade’s name is similar to several entities, leading to potential confusion:

Atrad.io:
A separate entity flagged as a scam, with complaints about website shutdowns, unprocessed withdrawals, and fake regulation.
Users report losses and suspect a Ponzi scheme, with no connection to Atrade.co.il confirmed.
A Trade International (atrintl.com):
Flagged by the Belgian FSMA as a fraudulent platform, lacking regulation and engaging in threatening behavior.
Complaints include demands for taxes and falsified logs, unrelated to Atrade.co.il but sharing a similar name.
Atrad.lk and Atrad Solutions:
Atrad.lk is a Sri Lankan stock trading platform, and Atrad Solutions focuses on emerging markets, both unrelated to Atrade.co.il.
These entities have no scam allegations but contribute to name overlap.
Analysis:
The similarity in names (Atrade, Atrad, A Trade International) creates significant brand confusion, potentially exploited by scammers to mimic Atrade’s legitimacy.
Users must verify the exact URL (https://www.atrade.co.il/) and avoid platforms with similar names but different domains.

12. User Precautions ¶

To mitigate risks when dealing with Atrade, users should: 1. Verify Regulation:

Check Atrade’s ISA license (#514666577) on the ISA website (https://www.isa.gov.il/).
Use FINRA BrokerCheck or similar tools for additional background. 2. Test Withdrawals:
Deposit a small amount initially and attempt a withdrawal to confirm processing reliability. 3. Avoid High Leverage:
Use conservative leverage (e.g., 1:10) to minimize losses, given the 1:100 offering. 4. Check Website Security:
Ensure the website uses HTTPS and a reputable SSL certificate. Avoid sharing sensitive data if security is unclear. 5. Research Complaints:
Search for recent reviews on Trustpilot, WikiFX, or forums to identify new withdrawal issues or scam allegations. 6. Beware of Brand Confusion:
Confirm the URL (https://www.atrade.co.il/) and avoid similar-named platforms like Atrad.io or atrintl.com. 7. Secure Accounts:
Enable 2FA (if available), use strong passwords, and monitor accounts for unauthorized activity. 8. Report Issues:
Contact the ISA or local regulators if withdrawals are denied or suspicious activity occurs. Report scams to the Federal Trade Commission (https://www.ftc.gov/).

13. Conclusion ¶

Atrade (https://www.atrade.co.il/) presents a mixed profile. Its claimed ISA regulation, long operational history, and diverse offerings suggest legitimacy, but significant concerns arise from withdrawal complaints, high leverage, limited transparency, and brand confusion with scam entities like Atrad.io and A Trade International. The lack of robust social media presence and detailed security information further elevates caution.

Risk Level: Moderate to High
Recommendation: Approach with caution. Verify the ISA license, test withdrawals with small amounts, and avoid similar-named platforms. Conduct thorough due diligence and prioritize brokers with stronger transparency and fewer complaints.
Critical Note: The overlap with scam entities underscores the need to critically evaluate Atrade’s operations. Users should not assume legitimacy based solely on claimed regulation or website appearance. For further verification, check the ISA’s official register and consult independent reviews. If issues arise, report them to regulators promptly.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on available data and does not constitute financial advice. Always conduct independent research before trading with any broker.