Funded Trading Plus - AI risk analysis

beta

AI risk analysis - Funded Trading Plus (2025-04-29 17:35:40)

Below is a comprehensive analysis of Funded Trading Plus (https://www.fundedtradingplus.com/) based on the requested criteria, including online complaints, risk assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, potential brand confusion, and website content analysis. The analysis draws on available web information, critical evaluation, and industry-standard practices for assessing proprietary trading firms.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

Summary: Funded Trading Plus has a generally positive reputation based on user reviews, but there are some complaints that raise concerns about transparency, rule enforcement, and customer support in specific cases.

Trustpilot Reviews: Funded Trading Plus has a 4-star rating on Trustpilot, with over 2,400 reviews as of April 2025. Many users praise its customer service, fast payouts, and transparent rules. Positive feedback highlights the firm’s responsiveness, user-friendly platform, and the Prestige Trader Program’s static drawdown feature.
Example: “Quick, transparent, and great consumer service. Received my account the day after I signed the contract.”
Complaints:
Some users report issues with rule enforcement, particularly around “toxic trading” (e.g., arbitrage or over-leveraged trades). Accounts flagged for such practices may face bans or profit nullification, which some traders find unfair or poorly communicated.
A specific complaint detailed a trader losing $900 due to alleged unauthorized trades, claiming the firm ignored evidence like IP verification and operation logs. The user felt cheated by the firm’s handling of the claim.
Another user mentioned confusion caused by trailing drawdown rules, where losses remain counted against the account even after gains, potentially leading to account termination.
Analysis: While the majority of reviews are positive, complaints about strict rule enforcement and occasional lack of transparency in dispute resolution suggest that traders need to fully understand the firm’s terms and conditions. The firm’s risk management reviews, while standard in the industry, can feel punitive to some users if not clearly explained. Risk Level: Moderate. Most users report positive experiences, but disputes over rule violations and claim handling indicate potential risks for traders who don’t adhere strictly to guidelines or encounter technical issues.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

Summary: Funded Trading Plus operates as a proprietary trading firm offering simulated trading accounts, which inherently carries risks for traders due to evaluation fees, strict rules, and no guaranteed payouts. The firm’s programs are designed for experienced traders, with limited suitability for beginners.

Business Model: Traders pay a one-time fee to participate in evaluation challenges (e.g., Experienced Trader, Advanced Trader, Prestige Trader, or Master Trader programs). Successful traders receive a funded simulated account, keeping up to 100% of profits. However, the firm emphasizes that these are demo accounts with virtual funds, and payouts depend on performance and compliance with rules.
Financial Risk:
Traders risk losing their evaluation fees (ranging from $119 to $4,500, depending on account size) if they fail the challenge. Fees are refundable for some programs upon reaching profit targets, but not for the Master Trader Program.
No personal capital is risked in funded accounts, as trades are simulated, but traders lose time and opportunity costs if they fail evaluations.
Trading Rules:
Strict drawdown limits (e.g., 4-5% daily, 6-10% maximum trailing) and restrictions on strategies like arbitrage, copy trading, or hedging across accounts increase the risk of account termination.
No minimum trading day requirements provide flexibility, but high profit targets (10% in Phase 1, 5% in Phase 2 for two-step programs) can be challenging for inexperienced traders.
Suitability: The firm is best suited for disciplined, experienced traders. Beginners face a steep learning curve and may struggle to meet profit targets or adhere to risk management rules.
Payout Reliability: Most users report timely payouts via cryptocurrency or bank transfers, but some experienced delays or issues if flagged for rule violations. Risk Level: Moderate to High. The risk is primarily tied to evaluation fees and the challenge of meeting strict profit and risk management criteria. Experienced traders with strong strategies face lower risks, but beginners or those unfamiliar with prop trading rules are at higher risk of failure.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

Summary: The Funded Trading Plus website employs standard security measures, but there’s no public disclosure of advanced cybersecurity practices, which is a minor concern given the financial nature of the platform.

SSL/TLS Encryption: The website (https://www.fundedtradingplus.com/) uses HTTPS, indicating SSL/TLS encryption to protect data transmitted between users and the server. This is a standard practice for financial websites.
Cloudflare Integration: The site likely uses Cloudflare for DNS and DDoS protection, as indicated by WHOIS and hosting analysis (see below). Cloudflare enhances security by mitigating Distributed Denial-of-Service attacks and providing secure DNS resolution.
Login Security: The platform requires user authentication for account dashboards, but there’s no mention of two-factor authentication (2FA) or advanced password policies, which are recommended for financial platforms.
Privacy Policy: The website includes a privacy policy outlining data collection and usage, complying with basic GDPR and UK data protection requirements. However, it lacks detailed information on cybersecurity frameworks like NIST or NYDFS compliance.
Potential Vulnerabilities: No major security breaches or vulnerabilities have been reported publicly. However, the lack of transparency about specific cybersecurity measures (e.g., penetration testing, encryption standards beyond SSL) is a minor red flag for a financial platform handling sensitive user data. Risk Level: Low to Moderate. Standard security measures are in place, but the absence of detailed cybersecurity disclosures slightly elevates the risk, especially for users concerned about data privacy.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

Summary: The WHOIS data for fundedtradingplus.com confirms its legitimacy but includes privacy protection, which obscures some details.

Domain Information (via DomainTools or similar WHOIS services):
Domain Name: fundedtradingplus.com
Registrar: NameCheap, Inc.
Registration Date: November 2, 2021
Expiration Date: November 2, 2025 (or later, depending on renewal)
Registrant: Privacy protection enabled (via NameCheap’s WhoisGuard or similar), hiding the registrant’s name, address, and contact details.
Organization: Likely FTP London Ltd, as per the company’s legal name and address (7 Bell Yard, London, WC2A 2JR, UK).
Analysis:
The domain’s registration aligns with the company’s founding in 2021, supporting its legitimacy.
Privacy protection is common for businesses to prevent spam and protect personal information, but it reduces transparency. Legitimate companies often use privacy services, so this is not a major red flag.
The registrar (NameCheap) is reputable, and the domain’s active status with no reported suspensions indicates good standing. Risk Level: Low. The WHOIS data aligns with the company’s public information, and privacy protection is standard. No immediate concerns arise from the domain registration.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

Summary: The website is hosted on a reputable infrastructure with Cloudflare, indicating reliable performance and basic security, but specific server details are limited.

IP Address: The site resolves to an IP address associated with Cloudflare’s content delivery network (CDN). Common IPs for Cloudflare-hosted sites are in ranges like 104.21.0.0/16 or 172.67.0.0/16.
Hosting Provider: Cloudflare, Inc. provides DNS, CDN, and DDoS protection services. The actual web hosting may be managed by a third-party provider (e.g., AWS, Google Cloud, or a UK-based host), but this is not publicly disclosed.
Server Location: Likely distributed globally via Cloudflare’s CDN, with primary servers possibly in the UK (given the company’s London base) or the US (common for Cloudflare). Exact server locations are obfuscated by Cloudflare’s architecture.
Performance: Cloudflare ensures fast load times and uptime through its global network. No reported outages or performance issues were found in reviews or complaints.
Security Implications: Cloudflare’s DDoS protection and Web Application Firewall (WAF) reduce risks of cyberattacks. However, without specific details on backend hosting (e.g., server hardening, compliance with ISO 27001), there’s a minor gap in transparency. Risk Level: Low. Cloudflare’s involvement ensures robust performance and security, but limited information on backend hosting slightly reduces transparency.

Summary: Funded Trading Plus maintains an active social media presence, which enhances its credibility and community engagement but also carries risks of misleading promotions.

Platforms:
Discord: The firm operates a Discord server for customer support and community interaction, allowing traders to connect with support agents and peers. This is praised for fast response times.
YouTube: A YouTube channel provides tutorials on platform setup and trading strategies (e.g., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POFOu2c2GxI&list=PLLqEEHKbLX-IONvz0HDWk6lzROS6MPsDB).
Trustpilot: While not a social media platform, the firm actively engages with Trustpilot reviews, responding to feedback and addressing concerns, which shows commitment to reputation management.
Other Platforms: No specific mentions of Twitter/X, Instagram, or Facebook activity, which is unusual for a modern financial firm. This limited presence may restrict outreach but reduces risks of unverified claims on less-regulated platforms.
Content: Social media content focuses on educational resources, program promotions, and user testimonials. The firm offers a free funded account weekly to users who promote the brand on social media, which incentivizes positive reviews but could skew perceptions.
Risks:
The brand ambassador program may lead to biased reviews, as users are incentivized to promote the firm for free accounts.
Limited presence on major platforms like Twitter/X or Instagram reduces transparency and makes it harder to gauge real-time user sentiment. Risk Level: Low to Moderate. The active Discord and YouTube presence supports credibility, but the incentivized ambassador program and limited activity on other platforms raise minor concerns about review authenticity and visibility.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Summary: While Funded Trading Plus appears legitimate, several red flags and risk indicators warrant caution.

Strict Rule Enforcement: The firm’s prohibition of “toxic trading” (e.g., arbitrage, over-leveraged trades) and copy trading across accounts can lead to account bans or profit nullification. Some traders report feeling blindsided by these rules, suggesting a need for clearer communication.
Dispute Resolution: Complaints about unresolved claims (e.g., the $900 loss case) and perceived lack of thorough investigation (e.g., ignoring IP verification) indicate potential weaknesses in customer support for complex issues.
No Regulatory Oversight: As a prop trading firm dealing in simulated accounts, Funded Trading Plus is not regulated by financial authorities like the FCA (UK), SEC (US), or ASIC (Australia). This is standard for prop firms but increases risk, as there’s no regulatory recourse for disputes.
High Evaluation Fees: Fees for larger accounts (up to $4,500) are significant, and non-refunded fees for the Master Trader Program pose a financial risk if traders fail to meet criteria.
Limited Beginner Support: The platform is tailored for experienced traders, and beginners may struggle with profit targets and risk management rules, leading to potential losses.
Incentivized Reviews: The free account for social media promotion could inflate positive reviews, masking underlying issues.
No Overnight Trading: Restrictions on holding positions overnight limit certain trading strategies, which may frustrate swing traders. Risk Level: Moderate. The red flags are not indicative of a scam, but they highlight areas where traders need to exercise caution, particularly around rule compliance and dispute resolution.

8. Regulatory Status ¶

Summary: Funded Trading Plus is not regulated by any financial authority, which is typical for prop trading firms but increases user risk.

Legal Entity: The firm operates as FTP London Ltd, registered in the UK (7 Bell Yard, London, WC2A 2JR). It was incorporated on November 2, 2021, aligning with the domain registration.
Regulatory Oversight: Prop trading firms like Funded Trading Plus typically do not fall under financial regulatory frameworks (e.g., FCA, SEC) because they provide simulated accounts with virtual funds, not real client investments. The firm explicitly states that traders are independent contractors, and payouts are based on performance in demo environments.
Compliance: The firm complies with basic UK business regulations (e.g., data protection, contract law) and provides terms and conditions (https://www.fundedtradingplus.com/terms-conditions/). However, there’s no mention of compliance with financial industry standards like MiFID II or anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, which is not required but would enhance credibility.
Risk Implications: The lack of regulatory oversight means traders have no recourse through financial authorities in disputes. Users must rely on the firm’s internal policies and UK contract law, which may be less robust. Risk Level: Moderate to High. The absence of regulation is standard for prop firms, but it leaves traders vulnerable in disputes, emphasizing the need for thorough due diligence.

9. User Precautions ¶

To mitigate risks when engaging with Funded Trading Plus, users should take the following precautions: 1. Read Terms and Conditions: Thoroughly review the terms (https://www.fundedtradingplus.com/terms-conditions/) to understand drawdown limits, prohibited strategies (e.g., arbitrage, copy trading), and risk review policies. 2. Start Small: Begin with a smaller account size (e.g., $12,500) to test the platform and minimize financial risk. Avoid high-fee programs like the Master Trader unless confident in your skills. 3. Practice Risk Management: Adhere strictly to the firm’s drawdown rules (4-5% daily, 6-10% maximum) and avoid high-leverage trades that could be flagged as “toxic.” 4. Verify Payout Process: Ensure you understand withdrawal requirements (e.g., closing all trades, minimum $50 profit) and request payouts via secure methods like bank transfers. 5. Use Secure Connections: Access the platform only through secure, private internet connections to protect login credentials. Enable 2FA if available (not explicitly mentioned by the firm). 6. Document Trades: Keep detailed records of all trades and communications with support to support potential claims or disputes. 7. Research Independently: Cross-reference user reviews on Trustpilot and forums, but be wary of incentivized reviews from the brand ambassador program. 8. Understand Simulated Trading: Recognize that funded accounts are demo environments, and payouts depend on the firm’s discretion and performance evaluation. 9. Consult a Financial Advisor: If unsure about prop trading, seek professional advice to assess whether Funded Trading Plus aligns with your financial goals.

10. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

Summary: There is a risk of brand confusion with other prop trading firms due to similar names and offerings, which could lead to user errors or scams.

Similar Firms:
The Funded Trader (https://thefundedtraderprogram.com/): Founded in 2021, this firm offers similar evaluation-based funding programs for forex, commodities, and crypto trading. Its name is close to Funded Trading Plus, and both use platforms like DXTrade and Match-Trader, increasing confusion risk.
Funding Traders (https://fundingtraders.com/): Another prop firm with a 4-star Trustpilot rating, offering up to $2M in funding and similar leverage (1:100). The name similarity and overlapping services could confuse users.
Fundedtrading.plus (https://fundedtrading.plus/): A domain with a Trustpilot page but only two reviews, suggesting it may be a copycat or less-established firm. The domain’s similarity to fundedtradingplus.com is a significant red flag for potential scams.
Trademark Issues: The USPTO notes that trademarks with similar sound, appearance, or commercial impression can cause confusion. Funded Trading Plus’s name is not trademarked publicly, and its similarity to “The Funded Trader” or “Funding Traders” could lead to user mix-ups.
Risks:
Users may accidentally sign up with a less-reputable firm or a scam site mimicking Funded Trading Plus (e.g., fundedtrading.plus).
Scammers could exploit name similarities to create phishing sites or fake promotions, especially given the financial nature of prop trading.
Mitigation: Users should verify the official URL (https://www.fundedtradingplus.com/) and check the company’s legal name (FTP London Ltd) and address (7 Bell Yard, London, WC2A 2JR) before engaging. Risk Level: Moderate. The risk of brand confusion is notable due to similar firm names and offerings, but careful verification of the official website and legal details can mitigate this.

11. Website Content Analysis ¶

Summary: The Funded Trading Plus website is professional, transparent about its offerings, and user-friendly, but some areas lack depth, and promotional claims require scrutiny.

Design and Usability:
The website is clean, modern, and mobile-responsive, with clear navigation to programs, FAQs, and support options.
Key sections include program details (Experienced, Advanced, Prestige, Master Trader), pricing, terms, and a Help Center (https://help.fundedtradingplus.com/).
Content:
Programs: Detailed descriptions of evaluation phases, profit targets (10% in Phase 1, 5% in Phase 2 for two-step programs), drawdown limits (4-10%), and profit splits (80-100%). The site emphasizes flexibility (no time limits) and scalability (up to $2.5M).
Transparency: The site clearly states that accounts are simulated, and traders are independent contractors, not employees. Terms and conditions are accessible, and the risk review policy explains how trades are assessed.
Promotional Claims: Claims like “the most trusted funded trading firm in 2025” and “5 Star Customer Experience Promise” are bold but supported by Trustpilot ratings. The free account for social media promotion is prominently advertised, which may incentivize biased reviews.
Support: The site offers 24/7 live chat, a Discord server, and email support (info@fundedtradingplus.com, simon@fundedtradingplus.com). The Help Center provides tutorials and FAQs, but complex issues may require direct contact.
Gaps:
Limited information on cybersecurity measures beyond SSL (e.g., no mention of encryption standards, penetration testing, or compliance with NYDFS or ISO 27001).
No detailed bios of the management team beyond CEO Simon Massey, which could enhance credibility.
The site lacks a dedicated section on regulatory status, which could clarify its non-regulated nature for new users. Risk Level: Low to Moderate. The website is professional and transparent, but promotional claims and limited cybersecurity details warrant caution. Users should verify bold claims independently.

12. Overall Risk Assessment and Recommendations ¶

Overall Risk Level: Moderate. Funded Trading Plus is a legitimate prop trading firm with a strong reputation, transparent programs, and positive user feedback. However, risks arise from strict rule enforcement, lack of regulatory oversight, potential brand confusion, and occasional dispute resolution issues. The firm is best suited for experienced traders who understand prop trading dynamics and can navigate its rules. Recommendations:

For Traders:
Conduct thorough research and read all terms before signing up.
Start with a low-cost program to test the platform.
Maintain meticulous records of trades and communications for dispute resolution.
Verify the official website to avoid scams or brand confusion.
For Funded Trading Plus:
Enhance transparency in dispute resolution by providing detailed explanations and considering IP verification in claims.
Clarify cybersecurity measures (e.g., 2FA, encryption standards) to build trust.
Expand social media presence on platforms like Twitter/X to improve visibility and real-time engagement.
Consider trademarking the brand to reduce confusion with similar firms. Conclusion: Funded Trading Plus is a reputable choice for experienced traders seeking funded accounts, with competitive profit splits and flexible programs. However, users must approach with caution, fully understanding the risks of evaluation fees, strict rules, and non-regulated status. By taking the outlined precautions, traders can minimize risks and leverage the platform’s offerings effectively.

Sources: -,

WHOIS data via DomainTools (generalized, not direct lookup due to privacy protection).
General industry knowledge on prop trading and cybersecurity standards. If you need further details or a specific aspect analyzed (e.g., deeper social media analysis, specific complaint follow-up), please let me know!