Based on the provided information and the directive to analyze the broker associated with Notesco Limited and the website https://www.fxfellow.com/, I will conduct a comprehensive analysis covering online complaints, risk level assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, potential brand confusion, and website content. The analysis will critically examine available data, avoid speculative conclusions, and adhere to the provided guidelines.

1. Broker Identification and Context ¶

The official website https://www.fxfellow.com/ is associated with Notesco Limited, which is claimed to be a Bermuda-based forex broker operating under the trading name FXCess (not FXFellow, as the website suggests). However, there are discrepancies in branding and regulatory claims that warrant careful scrutiny. The analysis will focus on FXCess (as tied to Notesco Limited and referenced in complaints) and the website https://www.fxfellow.com/, noting potential brand confusion.

2. Online Complaint Information ¶

• Sources of Complaints:
• FXCess Complaints: Multiple sources, including BrokersView (), TraderKnows (), and Medium (), report significant user dissatisfaction with FXCess. Common issues include:
• Withdrawal Problems: Clients report delays exceeding a week, unresponsiveness from customer support, and requests for dubious “transfer tax fees” to process withdrawals.
• Account Blocking: Allegations of FXCess deleting profits, blocking accounts, and ignoring communication attempts.
• Misleading Practices: Users claim bonuses are non-withdrawable, with legal documents requiring unattainable trading volumes for regular withdrawals.
• Forex Peace Army (FPA): FPA labels FXCess a scam, citing fraudulent practices targeting traders in the UK, France, Italy, Spain, and Morocco ().
• Trustpilot Feedback: FXCess has a 3.4/5 rating from 108 reviews, but feedback is conflicting, with some forums alleging fake positive reviews (,).
• FXFellow-Specific Complaints: No direct complaints are found for https://www.fxfellow.com/ in the provided data, possibly due to brand confusion or limited visibility. However, the association with Notesco Limited ties it to FXCess’s negative feedback.
• Critical Analysis:
• The volume and consistency of complaints about withdrawal issues and account blocking suggest operational red flags. The conflicting Trustpilot ratings and allegations of fake reviews indicate potential reputation manipulation, a common tactic among questionable brokers.
• The lack of specific complaints about FXFellow.com could imply it is a newer or less prominent domain, but its linkage to Notesco Limited inherits FXCess’s negative reputation.

3. Risk Level Assessment ¶

• Risk Indicators:
• Withdrawal and Account Issues: Persistent complaints about withdrawal delays and account blocking indicate high financial risk for users (,).
• Regulatory Concerns: FXCess claims to be registered in Bermuda under Notesco Limited (registration number 51491), but searches with the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) find no match, confirming it is unregulated (,). Unregulated brokers pose significant risks due to lack of oversight and investor protection.
• Bonus Manipulation: Non-withdrawable bonuses with high trading volume requirements are predatory practices that trap users ().
• User Feedback: Negative reviews on platforms like TraderKnows and FPA, coupled with reports of losses due to unfavorable trading decisions by the platform, elevate risk ().
• Risk Level: High
• The combination of an unregulated status, withdrawal issues, and deceptive bonus practices classifies FXCess (and by extension, Notesco Limited’s operations) as high-risk. The FXFellow.com website, while lacking specific complaints, is implicated due to its association with Notesco Limited.

4. Website Security Tools ¶

• FXFellow.com Security:
• SSL Certificate: The provided data does not specify the SSL status of https://www.fxfellow.com/. However, a 2019 analysis noted the site used HTTPS with a valid certificate (HTTP/1.1, 200 OK status), suggesting basic encryption (). Modern standards require a reputable SSL (e.g., Let’s Encrypt or DigiCert) with at least TLS 1.2.
• Server Security: Hosted on Microsoft-IIS/7.5 with ASP.NET in 2019, the server configuration is outdated by 2025 standards, potentially vulnerable to exploits if not updated ().
• No Active Threats Reported: A 2019 analysis by cutestat.com found no active threats, but this is outdated and not reflective of current security ().
• FXCess Security Concerns:
• Basic Interface and Technical Issues: Users report app crashes and a rudimentary website interface, suggesting poor maintenance or underinvestment in infrastructure ().
• Lack of Transparency: No detailed information on security measures (e.g., two-factor authentication, segregated accounts) is provided, which is a red flag for financial platforms ().
• Critical Analysis:
• The outdated server information for FXFellow.com and reported technical issues with FXCess suggest inadequate investment in robust security. Legitimate brokers typically maintain modern, secure infrastructure with transparent security protocols.
• Users should verify current SSL status and server configurations before engaging with FXFellow.com.

5. WHOIS Lookup ¶

• FXFellow.com:
• Domain Age: Registered on February 18, 2019, making it over 6 years old as of April 25, 2025 ().
• Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC (a reputable registrar, but not indicative of legitimacy).
• Domain Status: ClientDeleteProhibited, ClientRenewProhibited, ClientTransferProhibited, ClientUpdateProhibited, indicating restricted changes, possibly to prevent abuse or due to disputes.
• Name Servers: NS27.DOMAINCONTROL.COM, NS28.DOMAINCONTROL.COM (GoDaddy servers).
• WHOIS Privacy: Not explicitly mentioned, but lack of public registrant details suggests privacy protection, common for both legitimate and dubious sites.
• FXCess.com:
• Domain Age: Registered on September 20, 2018, also over 6 years old (,).
• Registrar: Not specified in provided data, but tied to Notesco Limited.
• WHOIS Privacy: Likely enabled, as no registrant details are disclosed.
• Critical Analysis:
• A domain age of 6+ years is moderate but not a guarantee of legitimacy, as scam sites can persist (). The restricted domain status for FXFellow.com could indicate protective measures or past issues.
• The lack of transparency in WHOIS data for both domains aligns with tactics used by questionable brokers to obscure ownership.

6. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

• FXFellow.com:
• Hosting Provider: In 2019, hosted on Microsoft-IIS/7.5, likely via GoDaddy’s infrastructure (). No current hosting data is provided.
• IP Address: Not specified in the data. Modern analysis would require checking the IP via tools like VirusTotal or WHOIS.domaintools.com.
• Server Location: Unknown, but GoDaddy typically uses U.S.-based servers.
• FXCess.com:
• Hosting Provider: Not detailed, but user-reported technical issues suggest shared or low-quality hosting ().
• Server Location: Unspecified, but offshore brokers often use jurisdictions with lax oversight.
• Critical Analysis:
• The outdated hosting information for FXFellow.com (Microsoft-IIS/7.5) is concerning, as modern brokers use secure, scalable cloud providers (e.g., AWS, Cloudflare). Lack of current IP and hosting data limits analysis.
• FXCess’s reported technical issues suggest underinvestment in reliable hosting, increasing risks of downtime or data breaches.

7. Social Media Presence ¶

• FXCess:
• Active Accounts: Operates accounts on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, with occasional interactive posts (e.g., trading-related questions) to engage users ().
• Content: Posts include basic educational content, market trend discussions, and blog updates every few days. However, user feedback on TraderKnows indicates dissatisfaction with the quality of trading advice ().
• Red Flags: Social media activity appears performative, with limited depth in educational content. Allegations of fake reviews suggest potential manipulation of social media perception ().
• FXFellow.com:
• Social Media: No specific social media presence is mentioned for FXFellow.com, which is unusual for a broker aiming to attract clients.
• Critical Analysis: The absence of a visible social media footprint for FXFellow.com could indicate a dormant or rebranded site, low marketing investment, or deliberate obscurity to avoid scrutiny.
• General Concerns:
• Social media risks include reputation damage from unaddressed complaints, as noted by FDIC guidance (). FXCess’s failure to address user dissatisfaction on platforms like TraderKnows amplifies this risk.
• Legitimate brokers typically maintain robust, transparent social media engagement, which FXFellow.com lacks.

8. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

• Unregulated Status: FXCess’s lack of BMA registration and unverifiable claims of regulation are major red flags (,).
• Withdrawal Issues: Consistent complaints about delays, fees, and account blocking indicate potential fraud (,).
• Bonus Manipulation: Non-withdrawable bonuses with high trading volume requirements are predatory ().
• Fake Reviews: Allegations of manipulated positive reviews undermine trust ().
• Technical Issues: App crashes and basic website interfaces suggest poor infrastructure ().
• Brand Confusion: The discrepancy between FXFellow.com and FXCess, both tied to Notesco Limited, raises concerns about intentional obfuscation or rebranding to evade scrutiny.
• Lack of Transparency: Minimal information on management, security measures, or operational details for both FXFellow.com and FXCess ().
• Domain Age and Activity: While both domains are over 6 years old, FXFellow.com’s low visibility and lack of complaints could indicate dormancy or a secondary site used for redirection or rebranding ().

9. Website Content Analysis ¶

• FXFellow.com:
• Content Overview: Offers trading in forex, spot metals, CFDs, indices, and commodities with 200+ instruments and spreads from 0 pips. Promotes no fees on deposits/withdrawals and provides platforms for Windows, Mac, and mobile ().
• Risk Warnings: Repeatedly states, “All trading involves risk. It is possible to lose all your capital,” which is standard but does not offset other concerns ().
• Red Flags: Lack of detailed company information, management team, or regulatory disclosures. The emphasis on “no fees” is a common tactic to attract novice traders, often masking hidden costs.
• FXCess.com:
• Content Overview: Claims to offer forex, metals, indices, commodities, futures, and stocks via MT4 with a $10 minimum deposit and 1:1000 leverage. Provides basic educational content and a blog ().
• Red Flags: High leverage (1:1000) is risky and often restricted by reputable regulators. Limited educational resources and user-reported poor trading advice undermine credibility ().
• Bonus Promotions: Non-withdrawable bonuses with restrictive terms are highlighted as deceptive ().
• Critical Analysis:
• Both websites use generic broker language but lack transparency in operational details. FXFellow.com’s sparse content and FXCess’s basic resources suggest minimal investment in user education or trust-building.
• The high leverage and bonus promotions align with tactics used by unregulated brokers to lure inexperienced traders.

10. Regulatory Status ¶

• FXCess:
• Claimed Registration: Notesco Limited, Bermuda (registration number 51491), but no BMA record exists, confirming unregulated status (,).
• Regulatory Alerts: Indonesia’s authority issued a warning against FXCess, and it is linked to CoinsPayWorld, another criticized entity ().
• UK Operations: Notesco Limited in the UK is no longer active under that name, and FXCess’s offshore status lacks the protections required in regulated jurisdictions (e.g., 730,000 GBP capital, segregated accounts, 1:30 leverage cap) ().
• FXFellow.com:
• Regulatory Information: No regulatory details are provided on the website, and its tie to Notesco Limited suggests it operates under the same unregulated framework ().
• Potential Confusion: A separate entity, https://www.fxfellow.ch/, claims to be a Swiss forex broker, but no evidence links it to Notesco Limited or FXFellow.com ().
• Critical Analysis:
• The unregulated status of both FXCess and FXFellow.com is a critical risk factor. Legitimate brokers in reputable jurisdictions (e.g., UK, EU) adhere to strict standards, including client fund segregation and compensation schemes, which Notesco Limited lacks.
• The regulatory alert from Indonesia and lack of BMA verification confirm FXCess’s dubious status, implicating FXFellow.com by association.

11. User Precautions ¶

To mitigate risks when considering FXCess or FXFellow.com, users should:

1. Verify Regulation: Check regulatory status via official databases (e.g., BMA, FCA). Avoid unregulated brokers like FXCess ().
2. Test Withdrawals: Start with a small deposit and test withdrawal processes before committing significant funds.
3. Avoid Bonuses: Decline bonus offers, as they often come with restrictive terms that hinder withdrawals ().
4. Use Demo Accounts: Practice with FXCess’s demo option to assess platform reliability without financial risk ().
5. Research Reviews: Cross-reference user feedback on platforms like Trustpilot, FPA, and TraderKnows, discounting overly positive reviews that may be fake ().
6. Secure Accounts: Ensure the website uses HTTPS with a reputable SSL certificate and enable two-factor authentication if available.
7. Monitor Social Media: Check for unaddressed complaints on social media, as per FDIC guidance ().
8. Consult Professionals: Seek advice from independent financial advisors before trading ().
9. Report Issues: Submit complaints to financial authorities or platforms like BrokersView if fraud is suspected ().

12. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

• FXFellow.com vs. FXCess: The query specifies https://www.fxfellow.com/ as Notesco Limited’s official website, but data suggests FXCess is the primary trading name, with FXFellow.com potentially being a secondary or rebranded site. This discrepancy creates confusion, possibly intentional to evade scrutiny or capitalize on similar branding.
• FXFellow.ch: A Swiss-based broker at https://www.fxfellow.ch/ claims to be a “swap-free” forex broker, but no evidence links it to Notesco Limited. The similar domain name could confuse users, though it appears unrelated ().
• Other Entities:
• FXFOWLE: An architecture firm with no relation to forex trading, but the similar name could cause accidental confusion ().
• FXIFY and FXLink Trades: Other forex brokers mentioned in the data (,) have no direct link to Notesco Limited but highlight the crowded forex market, increasing the risk of mistaking one broker for another.
• Critical Analysis:
• The FXFellow.com and FXCess discrepancy suggests potential rebranding to distance from FXCess’s negative reputation. Unregulated brokers often use multiple domains to confuse regulators or users.
• Users must verify the exact entity behind a website, as similar names (e.g., FXFellow, FXCess, FXFellow.ch) can lead to mistaken trust in an unrelated or fraudulent platform.

13. Critical Examination of the Narrative ¶

• Establishment Claims: Notesco Limited’s claim of being a Bermuda-based broker is unverifiable, and the lack of BMA registration contradicts its regulatory assertions. This aligns with tactics used by scam brokers to appear legitimate ().
• User Feedback: While FXCess has some positive Trustpilot reviews, the allegations of fake reviews and consistent negative feedback on FPA and TraderKnows outweigh these, suggesting a manipulated public image.
• Website Discrepancies: The FXFellow.com website’s sparse content and lack of social media presence contrast with FXCess’s more active but criticized operations, indicating FXFellow.com may be a dormant or redirect site.
• Regulatory Evasion: The use of an offshore jurisdiction (Bermuda) and lack of transparency in ownership or management are common among brokers aiming to avoid accountability ().

14. Conclusion ¶

The broker associated with Notesco Limited, operating as FXCess and linked to https://www.fxfellow.com/, presents significant risks based on the following:

• High-Risk Indicators: Unregulated status, withdrawal issues, account blocking, and deceptive bonus practices.
• Security Concerns: Outdated or unspecified server configurations and lack of transparent security measures.
• Reputation Issues: Consistent complaints, allegations of fake reviews, and regulatory warnings from Indonesia.
• Brand Confusion: Discrepancies between FXFellow.com and FXCess suggest potential rebranding or obfuscation.
• Regulatory Status: No verifiable regulation, increasing financial and operational risks. Recommendation: Avoid engaging with FXCess or https://www.fxfellow.com/ due to their unregulated status and documented user issues. Users should prioritize brokers regulated by reputable authorities (e.g., FCA, ASIC) with transparent operations and consistent positive feedback. If already involved, immediately explore options for fund recovery, including contacting financial authorities or legal advisors (). Sources:
• (BrokersView on FXCess)
• (FXFellow.com WHOIS and server data)
• (FXFellow.com content)
• (Medium on FXCess scam)
• (TraderKnows on FXCess)
• (FDIC on social media risks)
• (TradersUnion on broker risks) If further details or specific actions are needed, please clarify, and I can refine the analysis or assist with next steps.