Islero - AI risk analysis

beta

AI risk analysis - Islero (2025-04-29 17:35:43)

Below is a comprehensive analysis of Islero Capital Ltd, based on the provided official website (https://www.islerocap.com/) and available information, covering online complaints, risk level assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting, social media, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. The analysis critically examines the available data, incorporating insights from web sources where relevant, while avoiding unsupported claims.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

Findings: Limited specific user complaints about Islero Capital Ltd are publicly available in the provided sources. However, Scamadviser assigns islerocap.com a very low trust score, indicating a strong likelihood of being a scam based on algorithmic analysis of factors like ownership, location, and hosting. WikiFX notes that Islero is unregulated and advises awareness of risks, but no detailed user complaints are listed.
Analysis: The absence of widespread user complaints could be due to the website’s youth (registered recently, as noted below) or low user engagement. However, the low trust score and unregulated status are significant concerns, suggesting potential issues with transparency or reliability.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

Scamadviser Trust Score: Islerocap.com has a very low trust score, indicating a high likelihood of being a scam. Factors include:
Young domain age (recently registered).
Hosting on a shared server for data-sensitive financial services.
Location in a high-risk country (per International Banking Federation).
WikiFX Risk Warning: Describes Islero as an unregulated broker with a high risk due to lack of oversight by major regulatory bodies like ASIC (Australia) or FCA (UK).
Risk Warning on Website: The website acknowledges that CFDs and margin trading are high-risk, stating they “carry a high risk of losing your money due to leverage” and may not be suitable for all investors.
Analysis: The combination of a low trust score, unregulated status, and high-risk financial products (CFDs, leverage up to 1:500) suggests a high-risk level for users. The lack of regulatory oversight increases the potential for financial loss or fraudulent activity.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

SSL Certificate: A valid SSL certificate is present, encrypting communication between the user’s device and the website. However, scammers often use free SSL certificates, so this alone does not confirm legitimacy.
Security Practices: No specific details on additional security measures (e.g., two-factor authentication, data encryption beyond SSL) are provided on the website or in external sources.
Analysis: While the presence of an SSL certificate is a basic security feature, it is insufficient to establish trust, especially for a financial services website handling sensitive data. The lack of transparency about advanced security protocols is a concern.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

Domain Information:
Registrar: GoDaddy (DomainsByProxy.com for privacy protection).
Registrant Location: Tempe, Arizona, USA (via DomainsByProxy.com).
Domain Age: Registered recently (exact date not specified in sources but noted as “very young” by Scamadviser). WikiFX mentions a domain registration date of December 23, 2017, which conflicts with the “very young” claim, suggesting possible data inconsistency.
Analysis: The use of a privacy protection service hides the true registrant’s identity, which is common but can be a red flag for financial services requiring transparency. The young domain age (if accurate) increases risk, as scam websites often have short lifespans before being taken down. The discrepancy in reported registration dates warrants further investigation.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

Hosting Provider: Amazon Technologies Inc. (AWS).
Server Location: Likely in a high-risk country (per Scamadviser, based on International Banking Federation’s fraud and corruption list).
Shared Hosting: The website is hosted on a shared server, which is risky for data-sensitive financial services due to potential vulnerabilities.
Analysis: AWS is a reputable hosting provider, but shared hosting for a financial platform raises concerns about data security. The unspecified server location in a potentially high-risk country further increases the risk profile, as it may complicate legal recourse or oversight.

Findings: No specific information about Islero Capital Ltd’s social media presence is provided in the sources or on the website. Scamadviser advises checking social media links, noting that legitimate businesses typically have active profiles, but no such links are confirmed for islerocap.com.
Analysis: The lack of verifiable social media presence is a red flag, as legitimate financial brokers often maintain active profiles on platforms like LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook to engage clients and build trust. This absence suggests limited transparency or marketing effort, which is unusual for a broker claiming to be a “global leader in the FOREX industry”.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Based on the analysis and sources, the following red flags and risk indicators are identified:

Unregulated Status: No oversight by major regulatory bodies (e.g., ASIC, FCA), increasing the risk of fraud or mismanagement.
Low Trust Score: Scamadviser’s algorithm flags islerocap.com as likely a scam due to multiple risk factors.
Young Domain: A recently registered domain is a common trait of scam websites.
Shared Hosting: Hosting sensitive financial services on a shared server is risky.
Privacy-Protected WHOIS: Hiding registrant details reduces transparency.
Lack of Social Media: No confirmed social media presence limits credibility.
High-Risk Country Hosting: Server location in a high-risk country per banking standards.
Data Discrepancy: Conflicting domain registration dates (2017 vs. “very young”) suggest potential misinformation.
Analysis: These red flags collectively indicate a high-risk profile. The unregulated status and lack of transparency are particularly concerning for a broker offering high-leverage trading, which inherently carries significant financial risk.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

Claims and Promises:
The website claims Islero Capital Ltd is incorporated in Mauritius, regulated by the Mauritius Financial Services Commission (FSC) under license number GB24202795, with a registered office in Port Louis, Mauritius.
It positions itself as a “global leader in the FOREX industry” with a focus on innovation, integrity, and customer satisfaction.
Offers trading in CFDs, stocks, commodities, indices, forex, and cryptocurrencies with leverage up to 1:500 and spreads starting at 0.1 pip.
Risk Disclosure: Includes a risk warning about the high risk of CFDs and margin trading, acknowledging potential unsuitability for some investors.
Analysis: The claim of FSC regulation requires verification, as Mauritius is a less stringent regulatory jurisdiction compared to ASIC or FCA, and WikiFX disputes the validity of regulatory oversight. The ambitious claim of being a “global leader” seems inconsistent with the young domain and lack of social media presence. The risk disclosure is standard but does not mitigate concerns about unregulated operations.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

Claimed Regulation: Islero Capital Ltd claims to be regulated by the Mauritius Financial Services Commission (FSC) under license number GB24202795.
External Verification:
WikiFX states that Islero has no valid regulatory information and is not overseen by major bodies like ASIC or FCA.
No confirmation of the FSC license is provided in independent sources, and Mauritius is known for lighter regulatory standards, which may not inspire confidence.
Analysis: The lack of verifiable regulatory oversight from a reputable authority is a major concern. The FSC claim should be verified directly with the Mauritius FSC (e.g., via their public register). Until confirmed, the unregulated status reported by WikiFX suggests high risk, as unregulated brokers may engage in unfair practices without accountability.

10. User Precautions ¶

To mitigate risks when considering Islero Capital Ltd, users should:

Verify Regulation: Contact the Mauritius FSC directly to confirm license number GB24202795. Avoid trading until regulatory status is verified.
Conduct Due Diligence: Research independent reviews and user experiences on platforms like Trustpilot or Forex Peace Army, beyond Scamadviser and WikiFX.
Avoid High Leverage: Be cautious of the 1:500 leverage, which can amplify losses significantly.
Test with Small Deposits: If engaging, start with a minimal deposit to assess withdrawal processes and platform reliability.
Check Contact Details: Verify the physical address (Vieux Conseil Street, 4th Floor, Les Jamalacs Building, Port Louis, Mauritius) and test communication channels.
Secure Personal Data: Use strong passwords, enable two-factor authentication (if available), and avoid sharing sensitive financial information until legitimacy is confirmed.
Monitor Social Media: Look for official social media profiles and assess their activity and user engagement.
Report Suspicious Activity: If fraud is suspected, report to the FTC (https://reportfraud.ftc.gov/), FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (https://www.ic3.gov/), or local financial authorities.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

Similar Names:
Intellecap: An advisory firm (www.intellecap.com) focused on sustainable development, unrelated to forex trading. The name similarity (“cap” in both) could cause confusion, but Intellecap operates in a distinct sector.
Capcheck.co.in: A website in the “Caps” niche with a low trust score (7.4/100), flagged as untrustworthy. The “cap” element and financial context could lead to confusion.
CaPS Ltd: A UK-based compliance and privacy solutions provider (caps-ltd.co.uk), focused on AML and GDPR, not trading. The acronym similarity might confuse users seeking compliance-related services.
Trademark Risks: The USPTO notes that trademarks with similar sound, appearance, or meaning can cause confusion. “Islerocap” is unique but shares the “cap” element with other brands, potentially leading to mistaken identity, especially in the financial sector.
Analysis: While no direct evidence of intentional brand mimicry exists, the “cap” suffix in multiple financial or compliance-related brands could confuse users, particularly if Islero’s unregulated status leads to distrust. Users might mistake Islero for a regulated or established entity like Intellecap or CaPS Ltd.

12. Critical Assessment ¶

The analysis reveals significant concerns about Islero Capital Ltd:

High-Risk Profile: The combination of a low trust score, unregulated status, young domain, and shared hosting suggests a high likelihood of risk, potentially aligning with scam characteristics.
Regulatory Uncertainty: The claimed FSC regulation is unverified and contradicted by WikiFX, undermining credibility.
Transparency Issues: Hidden WHOIS details, lack of social media, and inconsistent domain age data reduce trust.
Potential Legitimacy: The website’s professional appearance, SSL certificate, and risk disclosure suggest some effort toward legitimacy, but these are insufficient without regulatory backing and transparent operations. However, the sources may not capture the full picture:
Scamadviser’s algorithm is not perfect and may flag legitimate sites.
The Mauritius FSC license, if valid, could indicate some oversight, though less rigorous than ASIC or FCA.
Limited user complaints might reflect low engagement rather than reliability.

Conclusion ¶

Islero Capital Ltd (https://www.islerocap.com/) presents a high-risk profile based on its unregulated status, low trust score, young domain, and multiple red flags (e.g., shared hosting, hidden WHOIS, no social media). While it claims regulation by the Mauritius FSC, this is unverified and disputed by external sources, and the lack of oversight by major authorities like ASIC or FCA is a significant concern. Users should exercise extreme caution, verify the FSC license directly, and avoid significant investments until legitimacy is confirmed. Potential brand confusion with entities like Intellecap or Capcheck.co.in adds to the risk of misidentification. For further due diligence, users should:

Check the Mauritius FSC register for license GB24202795.
Seek independent reviews on forex forums.
Test the platform with minimal funds and monitor withdrawal processes.
Report any suspicious activity to relevant authorities. This analysis is based on available data as of April 26, 2025, and users should conduct ongoing research due to the dynamic nature of online brokers.

Note: If you require specific links to the cited sources or additional analysis (e.g., deeper social media investigation or real-time web searches), please let me know!