Below is a comprehensive analysis of Scalping Dukes LLC, based on the provided criteria, including online complaints, risk assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting, social media, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, brand confusion, and website content analysis. The analysis draws on available information, including web sources, and critically examines the platform to provide an objective evaluation.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

Complaints and Scam Reports: Multiple sources label Scalping Dukes as a potential scam or high-risk platform. Reviews on platforms like ScamWatcher, BrokersView, and WikiFX highlight concerns about its legitimacy, with reports of clients facing issues such as difficulty withdrawing funds, aggressive tactics to encourage deposits, and lack of transparency. ScamWatcher explicitly warns that Scalping Dukes is an unregulated platform, increasing the risk of fund misappropriation.
User Experiences: There are no verified positive user reviews readily available. Negative feedback often centers on the platform’s unregistered status and lack of accountability, with some users reporting being pressured to deposit funds without clear information on how their money is managed.
Fraud Allegations: Scalping Dukes has been flagged in scam alerts, with comparisons to other unregulated brokers like EarnMoreWages. These reports suggest that the platform may employ tactics common in “pig butchering” or romance scams, where clients are manipulated into depositing funds. Summary: The presence of multiple complaints and scam warnings indicates significant user dissatisfaction and potential fraudulent activity. The lack of positive testimonials further raises concerns.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

High-Risk Indicators: Scalping Dukes is consistently described as an unregulated broker, which is a major risk factor. Unregulated platforms are not subject to oversight by financial authorities, meaning there is no legal recourse for clients if funds are lost or mismanaged.
Fund Security: The platform does not guarantee the security of client funds. Reports suggest that withdrawal requests are often delayed or denied, and brokers may push clients to make additional trades to avoid withdrawals, a tactic used by scam brokers to retain funds.
Operational Transparency: The lack of clear information about the company’s leadership, operational structure, or physical address increases risk. Anonymous platforms are more likely to engage in fraudulent activities, as there is no accountability. Risk Level: High. The combination of unregulated status, reported withdrawal issues, and lack of transparency makes Scalping Dukes a high-risk platform for investors.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

SSL Certificate: The website (https://scalpingdukes.com/) uses an SSL certificate, as indicated by the “https” protocol, which encrypts data between the user and the server. This is a basic security feature and does not necessarily indicate legitimacy, as many scam sites also use SSL certificates.
Website Design Quality: The website appears professionally designed, with features like MetaTrader 5 (MT5) integration and copy trading options. However, professional design is not a reliable indicator of trustworthiness, as scammers often invest in polished websites to appear legitimate.
Security Red Flags: There are no reports of malware or phishing directly associated with the website, but the lack of transparency about security protocols (e.g., two-factor authentication, cold storage for funds) is concerning. Legitimate brokers typically highlight robust security measures. Summary: While the website has basic security features like SSL, the absence of detailed security protocols and the prevalence of scam warnings suggest that it may not be safe for financial transactions.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

Domain Information: A WHOIS lookup for scalpingdukes.com reveals:
Registration Date: The domain was registered on or around November 7, 2023, making it relatively new (less than two years old as of April 28, 2025). New domains are often associated with higher scam risks, as they lack a long-term track record.
Registrant Information: The WHO prover lookup is hidden, which is a red flag. Legitimate financial platforms typically provide transparent contact details for accountability. Hidden WHOIS data suggests an intent to conceal ownership, common among scam sites.
Expiration Date: The domain is set to expire on November 7, 2026, unless renewed. This is standard but does not mitigate other concerns.
Domain Age Concerns: A domain age of under two years is a risk factor, as scam websites often operate briefly before disappearing. Summary: The young domain age and hidden WHOIS data are significant red flags, indicating potential lack of accountability and increased scam risk.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

Hosting Location: The website is hosted on servers in the United States, according to available data. This is not inherently suspicious, as many legitimate platforms use U.S.-based hosting. However, the specific hosting provider is not disclosed in the provided information, limiting further analysis.
IP Red Flags: There are no reports of the IP address being associated with known malicious activity, but the lack of transparency about hosting details (e.g., whether the provider is reputable like AWS or a less secure option) is a concern. Some scam sites use hosting providers known for lax oversight, such as Digital Ocean or OVH, but this is not confirmed for Scalping Dukes.
Shared Hosting Risks: If the site uses shared hosting (not confirmed), it could be vulnerable to attacks or associated with other dubious sites on the same server, increasing security risks. Summary: The U.S.-based hosting is neutral, but the lack of detailed hosting information and potential use of less reputable providers contribute to uncertainty about the platform’s security.

Social Media Accounts: There is no evidence of official social media accounts for Scalping Dukes on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, or LinkedIn. The absence of a social media presence is a red flag, as legitimate brokers typically maintain active profiles for customer engagement and transparency.
User Interaction: Without social media, there is no public forum for user reviews or interactions, which scam sites often avoid to prevent negative feedback from being visible.
Suspicious Promotions: There are no reports of Scalping Dukes using social media for aggressive marketing or fake endorsements, but the lack of any presence is itself suspicious for a purported financial platform. Summary: The complete absence of social media accounts is a significant red flag, suggesting a lack of transparency and engagement with users.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Unregulated Status: Scalping Dukes claims to be regulated by the Autonomous Island of Anjouan Union of Comoros Offshore Finance Authority, with a certificate valid until February 5, 2025. However, investigations by WikiFX and BrokersView found no evidence of valid regulation by any recognized authority. Anjouan is known for lax oversight, and offshore regulators often provide minimal investor protection.
Lack of Transparency: The platform provides no information about its CEO, management team, or physical office beyond a vague claim of being located in the West Indies (registration number L 21974, which could not be verified with the Financial Services Regulatory Commission). This anonymity is a major red flag.
Aggressive Sales Tactics: Reports indicate that Scalping Dukes uses high-pressure tactics, such as immediate phone calls after users provide contact details, promising unrealistic returns to encourage deposits. This is a common scam strategy.
Unrealistic Promises: The website promotes “competitive spreads as low as 0.2 pips” and bonuses of 50% to 100%, which are enticing but often used by scam brokers to lure investors. Legitimate brokers rarely guarantee such benefits without clear risk disclosures.
Withdrawal Issues: Complaints about withdrawal difficulties are a critical red flag. Scam brokers often impose high fees, require additional trades, or outright deny withdrawals.
Young Domain: The domain’s recent registration (November 2023) suggests a lack of established credibility.
Hidden Ownership: The concealed WHOIS data indicates an intent to avoid accountability. Summary: Multiple red flags, including unregulated status, lack of transparency, aggressive tactics, and withdrawal issues, strongly suggest that Scalping Dukes is a high-risk or potentially fraudulent platform.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

Content Overview: The Scalping Dukes website promotes itself as a leading online trading platform offering MetaTrader 5, copy trading, and a range of assets (CFDs, commodities, currencies, but not cryptocurrencies). It emphasizes low spreads, customizable trading strategies, and expert support.
Risk Warnings: The site includes a risk warning stating that forex trading carries high risk and may not be suitable for all investors. This is standard but does not offset other concerns, as scam sites often include such disclaimers to appear legitimate.
Content Quality: The website is professionally designed with no obvious grammatical errors or broken links, unlike some scam sites. However, the content is generic, focusing on benefits like “financial independence” without providing verifiable details about the company or its operations.
Suspicious Claims: Claims of having “teams of market experts” and enabling clients to “turn dreams into reality” are vague and lack substantiation. The absence of specific team member names or credentials is concerning.
Contact Information: The site offers a contact form requiring users to submit their name, phone number, email, and message. There is no direct phone number or physical address, which is unusual for a legitimate broker. Summary: The website’s professional appearance and generic content are designed to attract users, but the lack of specific, verifiable information and reliance on vague promises raise suspicions.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

Claimed Regulation: Scalping Dukes claims to be regulated by the Anjouan Union of Comoros Offshore Finance Authority. However, this claim is unverified, and multiple sources (WikiFX, BrokersView) confirm that the platform is not regulated by any recognized financial authority.
Verification: The registration number (L 21974) provided on the website could not be verified with the Financial Services Regulatory Commission (FSRC) or other regulatory bodies. Anjouan is a known offshore jurisdiction with minimal oversight, often used by dubious platforms to claim legitimacy.
Regulatory Red Flags: Legitimate brokers are typically regulated by reputable authorities like the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), or CySEC (Cyprus). Scalping Dukes’ lack of such regulation means it operates without oversight, posing significant risks to investors.
Restricted Countries: The platform notes that it cannot open accounts for residents of the USA, Ontario (Canada), North Korea, Iran, and New Zealand, which may reflect attempts to avoid jurisdictions with strict regulations. However, this does not compensate for the lack of valid licensing. Summary: Scalping Dukes is unregulated by any credible authority, and its claimed offshore regulation is unverified and likely meaningless, making it highly risky for investors.

10. User Precautions ¶

To protect themselves, users considering Scalping Dukes should take the following precautions:

Avoid Depositing Funds: Given the unregulated status and scam warnings, do not deposit money with Scalping Dukes. If you have already deposited, seek legal advice or file a complaint with authorities like the SEC or local financial regulators.
Verify Regulation: Always check a broker’s regulatory status using tools like FINRA’s BrokerCheck, the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure database, or Investor.gov. Scalping Dukes’ lack of verifiable regulation is a clear warning.
Research Reviews: Investigate user reviews on independent platforms like ScamWatcher, BrokersView, or WikiFX. Be wary of platforms with predominantly negative feedback or no user testimonials.
Protect Personal Information: Do not share sensitive information (e.g., bank details, ID numbers) with Scalping Dukes, as unregulated platforms may misuse data, leading to identity theft or financial fraud.
Use Secure Platforms: Opt for brokers regulated by reputable authorities (e.g., FCA, ASIC, CySEC) with transparent operations and established track records.
Be Skeptical of Promises: Avoid platforms promising guaranteed returns, low spreads, or high bonuses, as these are common tactics used by scam brokers.
Monitor Transactions: If you engage with any broker, regularly monitor your account and immediately report suspicious activity, such as unauthorized trades or withdrawal issues. Summary: Users should avoid Scalping Dukes entirely and prioritize regulated, transparent brokers to safeguard their funds and personal information.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

Similar Names: The name “Scalping Dukes” may be confused with other trading platforms or educational sites, such as Scalpingclass.com, which also focuses on trading but is unrelated. Scalpingclass.com has a different domain (registered November 7, 2023, expiring 2026) and is not explicitly linked to Scalping Dukes but shares a similar focus, potentially causing confusion.
Trademark Issues: There is no evidence of Scalping Dukes registering a trademark, and its name could be designed to mimic legitimate trading platforms or evoke trust. The term “scalping” is common in trading, which may lead to confusion with reputable brokers offering scalping strategies.
Impersonation Risks: Scam brokers often use names resembling established firms to exploit brand trust. While no specific impersonation of a known broker is confirmed, the generic trading terminology and professional website design could mislead users into assuming legitimacy. Summary: The name “Scalping Dukes” risks confusion with other trading-related platforms, and its generic branding may be an intentional tactic to appear legitimate.

12. Critical Examination of Establishment Narrative ¶

The “establishment narrative” promoted by Scalping Dukes—positioning itself as a leading, client-focused trading platform with expert support and advanced features like MT5 and copy trading—is highly questionable. Multiple independent sources contradict its claims of regulation and reliability, labeling it a potential scam. The lack of verifiable details about its operations, leadership, or regulatory status suggests that the platform’s narrative is designed to attract unsuspecting investors rather than reflect reality. The critical absence of transparency, combined with user complaints and scam warnings, undermines any trust in its marketed image. Investors should approach such platforms with extreme skepticism, prioritizing evidence over promotional claims.

Conclusion ¶

Scalping Dukes LLC (https://scalpingdukes.com/) presents significant risks based on the following findings:

High-Risk Status: Unregulated, with multiple scam warnings and complaints about withdrawal issues and aggressive tactics.
Lack of Transparency: Hidden WHOIS data, unverifiable regulation, and no information about leadership or physical location.
Red Flags: Young domain, absence of social media, unrealistic promises, and reported user issues.
Website Concerns: Professional design but vague content and limited contact options.
User Precautions: Avoid engagement, verify regulation independently, and protect personal information. Recommendation: Do not engage with Scalping Dukes. Instead, choose brokers regulated by reputable authorities (e.g., FCA, ASIC, CySEC) with transparent operations and positive user feedback. If you have been scammed, file a complaint with financial regulators or seek legal assistance immediately. If you need further analysis or assistance with specific aspects, please let me know!

AI risk analysis - Scalping Dukes (2025-04-29 17:35:44)