To provide a comprehensive analysis of Granjaya Asia Investama (GAI), the broker associated with the official website https://www.granjaya.id/, I will evaluate it based on the requested criteria: online complaint information, risk level assessment, website security tools, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, potential risk indicators, website content analysis, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. The analysis will leverage available web information, critical reasoning, and industry-standard practices to assess the broker’s legitimacy, transparency, and risk profile. Note that this response aims to be thorough yet concise, adhering to the provided guidelines.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

• Findings: A search for online complaints specifically targeting Granjaya Asia Investama or https://www.granjaya.id/ yields no prominent results on major complaint platforms like Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army, or ScamAdviser. There are no widely reported user reviews or allegations of fraud, withdrawal issues, or misconduct tied directly to GAI.
• Analysis: The absence of complaints could indicate a low profile, limited user base, or a relatively new operation. However, it does not inherently confirm legitimacy, as some brokers may suppress negative feedback or operate under less scrutinized jurisdictions. The lack of user reviews is a neutral factor but warrants caution due to limited transparency.
• Source Note: No direct complaints were found in the provided web results or through general web searches conducted in real-time.

---

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

• Risk Factors:
• Regulatory Status: The regulatory status of GAI is unclear (detailed in section 9). Operating without clear oversight from a reputable financial authority (e.g., FCA, ASIC, or SEC) increases risk.
• Market Offerings: GAI claims to specialize in Forex, commodities, indices, and financial derivatives, which are high-risk instruments. Their promise of “maximizing profit potential” and “unparalleled opportunities” is typical of brokers enticing inexperienced traders, potentially downplaying risks.
• Transparency: Limited information about the company’s history, leadership, or operational track record raises concerns about accountability.
• Risk Level: Moderate to High. The combination of unclear regulation, high-risk financial products, and lack of transparent operational history suggests caution. Without verifiable user feedback or regulatory backing, the risk of financial loss or fraudulent practices cannot be ruled out.
• Source: Website content from https://www.granjaya.id/.

---

3. Website Security Tools ¶

• SSL Certificate: The website https://www.granjaya.id/ uses HTTPS, indicating an SSL certificate is in place, which encrypts data between the user and the server. This is a standard security measure for financial websites.
• Security Headers: Using tools like SecurityHeaders.com, the website’s security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options) are not publicly detailed in the provided results. Basic SSL is present, but advanced protections (e.g., HSTS, robust firewall configurations) are unconfirmed.
• Vulnerability Scanning: No evidence suggests GAI’s website has been scanned for vulnerabilities per OWASP Top 10 standards, as recommended for financial platforms. The absence of disclosed security audits is a concern.
• Analysis: The website meets minimum security standards with HTTPS but lacks transparency about advanced security measures, which is critical for a broker handling sensitive financial data. This suggests a basic but potentially inadequate security posture.
• Recommendation: Users should verify the SSL certificate’s validity (e.g., via browser padlock) and avoid sharing sensitive information until further security details are confirmed.

---

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

• Domain Information:
• Domain: granjaya.id
• Registrar: Likely registered through an Indonesian registrar, as “.id” is the country code top-level domain (ccTLD) for Indonesia.
• Registration Date: Exact registration date is unavailable in the provided results, but the website’s professional design suggests it is not brand new (likely registered within the last few years).
• Registrant Details: WHOIS data for “.id” domains is often privacy-protected or restricted due to Indonesian regulations. No public WHOIS data is provided in the search results, limiting insight into ownership.
• Analysis: The lack of transparent WHOIS data is not uncommon for “.id” domains but reduces accountability. Legitimate brokers typically provide clear contact details and ownership information to build trust. The absence of this data is a minor red flag.
• Source Note: No specific WHOIS data was found in the provided results,.

---

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

• Hosting Provider: The hosting provider for https://www.granjaya.id/ is not explicitly identified in the provided results. However, as an Indonesian-focused broker, it is likely hosted on a regional or global provider (e.g., AWS, Google Cloud, or an Indonesian data center).
• IP Address: No specific IP address is provided in the results, and tools like ipaddress.com or similar would be needed for precise analysis.
• Geographical Location: Assuming the broker operates primarily in Indonesia, the server is likely located in Southeast Asia for latency optimization, but this is speculative without data.
• Analysis: Without IP or hosting details, it’s challenging to assess the infrastructure’s reliability or security. Legitimate brokers often disclose hosting details or use reputable providers with strong uptime and DDoS protection. The lack of information is a transparency gap.
• Recommendation: Users can use tools like WHOIS.domaintools.com or ipaddress.com to independently verify hosting details.

---

6. Social Media Presence ¶

• Findings: The provided results do not mention specific social media profiles for Granjaya Asia Investama (e.g., LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Instagram, or Facebook). A search for “Granjaya Asia Investama” on social platforms yields no verified accounts directly linked to the broker.
• Analysis: A legitimate broker typically maintains an active social media presence to engage clients, share market insights, and build trust. The absence of visible social media activity is a significant red flag, suggesting either a low-profile operation or deliberate avoidance of public scrutiny. This aligns with warnings about brokers not marketing via social media unless verified.
• Recommendation: Users should be cautious of brokers lacking social media presence and avoid engaging with unverified accounts claiming to represent GAI.

---

7. Red Flags ¶

• Lack of Regulatory Clarity: No mention of licensing or oversight by a recognized financial authority (e.g., Indonesia’s BAPPEBTI, FCA, or ASIC) is a major concern.
• Vague Ownership: The website does not disclose key details about the company’s founders, executives, or physical office address beyond a generic Indonesian reference.
• Overpromising Language: Phrases like “Gatéway to Abundancé,” “unparalleled opportunities,” and “maximize your profit potential” are promotional and may mislead inexperienced traders about risks.
• No User Reviews: The absence of client feedback on independent platforms limits validation of GAI’s services.
• Social Media Absence: As noted, the lack of verified social media profiles reduces transparency and engagement.
• Analysis: These red flags collectively suggest a higher-than-average risk of dealing with GAI. While not definitive proof of illegitimacy, they align with characteristics of potentially unreliable brokers,.

---

8. Potential Risk Indicators ¶

• High-Risk Products: Trading Forex, commodities, and derivatives involves significant financial risk, especially without clear risk disclosure or educational resources.
• Unverified Technology Claims: GAI touts “advanced bridge technology” and MT5 platform support, but there’s no independent verification of its infrastructure’s reliability or security.
• Potential for Brand Confusion: The name “Granjaya” resembles other entities (e.g., granjaya.io, a technology solutions provider), which could lead to confusion.
• Lack of Audit Trails: No mention of third-party audits for financial practices or cybersecurity, which is standard for reputable brokers.
• Analysis: These indicators suggest GAI may not prioritize transparency or user protection, increasing the risk of financial loss or data breaches.

---

9. Website Content Analysis ¶

• Content Overview:
• The website positions GAI as a “comprehensive Market Making service provider” specializing in Forex, commodities, indices, and derivatives.
• It highlights “advanced bridge technology,” MT5 platform access, and “expert tools and insights” for trading.
• The tone is promotional, emphasizing profit potential and seamless connectivity without detailed risk disclosures.
• Strengths:
• Professional design and clear navigation.
• Mentions MT5, a widely used trading platform, suggesting some operational capability.
• Weaknesses:
• Vague Details: No specific information about licensing, company history, or leadership.
• Risk Disclosure: While a “Risk Disclosure” statement is mentioned, it is described as brief and not exhaustive, which is insufficient for high-risk trading.
• Lack of Educational Content: No visible resources to educate users on trading risks, a hallmark of reputable brokers.
• Analysis: The website’s content is polished but lacks substance in critical areas like regulation, transparency, and risk education. This aligns with characteristics of potentially untrustworthy brokers that prioritize marketing over accountability.

---

10. Regulatory Status ¶

• Findings: The website does not explicitly state GAI’s regulatory status or licensing details. In Indonesia, legitimate brokers are typically regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (BAPPEBTI). No evidence suggests GAI is registered with BAPPEBTI or any international regulator (e.g., FCA, ASIC, CySEC).
• Analysis: Operating without clear regulatory oversight is a significant red flag in the brokerage industry. Unregulated brokers may not adhere to standards for client fund protection, fair trading practices, or dispute resolution. The absence of regulatory information on the website is a critical risk factor,.
• Recommendation: Users should contact BAPPEBTI or check its official website to verify GAI’s status before engaging.

---

11. User Precautions ¶

To mitigate risks when considering GAI, users should:

• Verify Formally Request Regulatory Verification: Contact BAPPEBTI or relevant authorities to confirm GAI’s licensing status.
• Start Small: If engaging, deposit only what you can afford to lose and test withdrawal processes.
• Use Secure Connections: Ensure all interactions with the website are via HTTPS and avoid public Wi-Fi.
• Research Independently: Search for user reviews on platforms like Forex Peace Army or Trustpilot, and verify social media presence.
• Avoid High Leverage: Be cautious of high-leverage offers, which amplify losses.
• Consult Professionals: Seek advice from a licensed financial advisor before trading.
• Monitor Accounts: Regularly check bank and trading accounts for unauthorized activity.
• Source: General best practices from,.

---

12. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

• Similar Domains:
• granjaya.io: A technology solutions provider focused on architecture, UI design, and backend development. This entity is unrelated to GAI but shares a similar name, potentially causing confusion.
• account.granjaya.io: Mentioned as a “Responsive Admin Dashboard Template,” which may be a login portal for granjaya.io, not GAI.
• Analysis: The similarity between “granjaya.id” and “granjaya.io” could lead to accidental engagement with the wrong entity. Scammers sometimes exploit similar domain names to mimic legitimate businesses. Users must verify they are interacting with https://www.granjaya.id/ and not a related or cloned site.
• Recommendation: Double-check URLs and avoid clicking links from unsolicited emails or social media claiming to be GAI.

---

Conclusion ¶

Granjaya Asia Investama (https://www.granjaya.id/) presents a moderate to high-risk profile due to several concerning factors:

• Unclear Regulatory Status: No evidence of licensing with BAPPEBTI or other reputable authorities.
• Transparency Gaps: Lack of ownership details, social media presence, and user reviews.
• Red Flags: Overpromising language, absence of robust security disclosures, and potential brand confusion with granjaya.io.
• Positive Aspects: Professional website design and HTTPS usage indicate some operational effort, but these are insufficient without regulatory backing. Recommendation: Proceed with extreme caution. Do not engage with GAI until regulatory status is verified with BAPPEBTI or another authority. Consider established, regulated brokers with transparent operations and strong user feedback instead. If you choose to proceed, follow the user precautions outlined above and consult a financial advisor. Disclaimer: This analysis is based on publicly available information and does not constitute financial or legal advice. Always conduct your own due diligence before engaging with any broker. If you need further assistance, such as verifying specific details with BAPPEBTI or analyzing another broker, please let me know!