Below is a detailed analysis of TRADESKA LIMITED, based on the provided criteria, including online complaints, risk level, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting, social media, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. The analysis draws on available information, including web sources, and critically examines the broker’s credibility.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

• Complaints and Reviews: There is limited public information on platforms like Trustpilot or BrokerChooser specifically detailing user complaints about TRADESKA LIMITED. However, a review on WikiFX gives TRADESKA a low score of 1.19, citing concerns about its regulatory status and legitimacy.
• User Feedback: The lack of widespread user reviews is a concern, as established brokers typically have a more robust online presence with both positive and negative feedback. The absence of reviews could indicate a new or low-profile broker, which carries inherent risks.
• Scam Allegations: A report on hebertpark.com raises concerns about tradeska.com, noting that it was created in August 2021 and may be a scam or fake website. Visitors have reported doubts about its legitimacy, though no specific user complaints are detailed. Risk Indicator: The scarcity of reviews and the scam allegations suggest caution. Legitimate brokers typically have a track record of user feedback, even if mixed.

---

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

• High Leverage: TRADESKA offers leverage up to 1:500, which is significantly higher than regulatory limits in many jurisdictions (e.g., 1:30 in the UK and Australia, 1:50 in the US and Canada). High leverage can amplify both gains and losses, posing substantial risks, especially for inexperienced traders.
• Unregulated Status: TRADESKA is not regulated by a recognized financial authority. Its claimed US NFA license (0549794) is flagged as unauthorized and exceeds the scope of a non-forex license, indicating an abnormal regulatory status.
• Minimum Deposit: A minimum deposit of $500 is required to open a real account, which is relatively high compared to some regulated brokers. High minimums can be a barrier and a risk if the broker is unreliable.
• Transparency Issues: The lack of clear information on deposit and withdrawal terms may lead to uncertainty and potential financial risks for traders. Risk Level: High. The combination of high leverage, lack of regulation, and transparency issues suggests significant financial and operational risks.

---

3. Website Security Tools ¶

• SSL Certificate: Tradeska.com has a valid SSL certificate, which encrypts communication between the user’s device and the website. This is a standard security feature but does not guarantee legitimacy, as scammers often use free SSL certificates.
• Website Design: The website appears professional, offering multilingual support (15 languages) and a FAQ section. However, broken social media icons that do not link to active profiles suggest a lack of attention to detail or an inactive social media presence, which is unusual for a legitimate broker.
• Security Vulnerabilities: No specific reports of phishing, malware, or data breaches are linked to tradeska.com. However, the website’s relatively recent creation (August 2021) and lack of established trust increase the risk of potential vulnerabilities. Risk Indicator: The presence of an SSL certificate is positive, but broken social media links and the website’s youth raise concerns about reliability and professionalism.

---

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

• Domain Information:
• Domain Name: tradeska.com
• Registrar: Wild West Domains, LLC
• Registration Date: August 11, 2021
• Expiration Date: August 11, 2022 (likely renewed, as the site is still active)
• Registrant: TRADESKA LIMITED, 27 Old Gloucester Street, WC1N 3AX, London, UK
• Contact: Phone: +44.2080898522; Email: admin@tradeska.com
• Name Servers: NS37.DOMAINCONTROL.COM, NS38.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
• Analysis: The domain is relatively new (created in 2021), which is a red flag for a financial services provider, as reputable brokers typically have longer-established domains. The registrant details align with the company’s claimed address, but the use of a generic London address (Old Gloucester Street) is common among shell companies, raising suspicions about physical presence. Risk Indicator: The recent domain registration and generic address suggest potential legitimacy issues.

---

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

• Hosting Provider: The website is hosted by GoDaddy (via NS37.DOMAINCONTROL.COM and NS38.DOMAINCONTROL.COM). GoDaddy is a reputable hosting provider, but it is also used by many low-trust websites due to its affordability.
• IP Location: The server location is not explicitly high-risk, but the hosting provider’s association with some spammy or fraudulent sites (as noted by Scamadviser) lowers the trust score.
• DNS Records: No anomalies are reported in the DNS records, but the lack of advanced security features (e.g., DNSSEC is unsigned) is a minor concern. Risk Indicator: The hosting setup is standard but does not provide strong evidence of legitimacy, given the provider’s mixed reputation.

---

6. Social Media Presence ¶

• Social Media Links: The tradeska.com website has broken social media icons, meaning users cannot navigate to active profiles. This suggests either an inactive or non-existent social media presence, which is unusual for a broker aiming to serve an international client base.
• Engagement: No evidence of active social media accounts (e.g., Twitter/X, Facebook, LinkedIn) was found in the provided data. Legitimate brokers typically maintain active social media to engage with clients and build trust. Risk Indicator: The lack of a verifiable social media presence is a significant red flag, indicating potential unreliability or a lack of transparency.

---

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

• Unregulated Status: The broker’s lack of regulation by a reputable authority (e.g., FCA, ASIC, SEC) and the unauthorized NFA license are major red flags. Unregulated brokers pose risks of fund mismanagement or fraud.
• High Leverage: Leverage up to 1:500 exceeds safe limits set by major regulators, increasing the risk of significant losses.
• New Domain: The website’s creation in August 2021 indicates a lack of operational history, which is risky for a financial services provider.
• Broken Social Media Links: Inactive or broken social media links suggest a lack of engagement or professionalism.
• Generic Address: The registered address (27 Old Gloucester Street, London) is commonly used by shell companies, casting doubt on the broker’s physical presence.
• Lack of Transparency: Unclear terms for deposits and withdrawals raise concerns about potential hidden fees or difficulties in accessing funds.
• Overpromising Claims: The website’s claims of being a “leading CFD service provider” since 2021 lack substantiation, as a recently established broker cannot claim such status without evidence. Risk Indicator: Multiple red flags point to a high-risk broker with questionable legitimacy.

---

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

• Content Quality: The website promotes STP accounts, MT5 platform access, and trading in forex, commodities, shares, indices, and cryptocurrencies. It emphasizes low spreads (from 0.0 pips) and account plans for convenience. However, the content is generic and lacks specific details about trading conditions or risk management tools.
• Risk Disclosures: A general risk disclaimer is present, stating that online trading involves significant risk and potential loss of invested capital. However, the disclaimer is standard and does not address specific risks tied to the broker’s operations.
• Customer Support: The website claims 24/7 support via live chat, phone, email, and online messaging, with a registered address provided. This is a positive feature, but the broken social media links undermine credibility.
• Language Support: The site is available in 15 languages, indicating an international focus, which is common among both legitimate and questionable brokers. Risk Indicator: The content is professionally presented but lacks depth and transparency, with generic claims and insufficient evidence to back up the broker’s credibility.

---

9. Regulatory Status ¶

• Claimed License: TRADESKA claims a US NFA license (0549794), but this is flagged as unauthorized and limited to non-forex activities, making it irrelevant for forex/CFD trading. The regulatory status is abnormal, and the broker is effectively unregulated.
• Verification: No evidence suggests TRADESKA is overseen by a top-tier regulator (e.g., FCA, ASIC, CySEC). Legitimate brokers are typically registered with at least one stringent authority, which TRADESKA lacks.
• Regulatory Risks: Unregulated brokers are not subject to client fund segregation, compensation schemes, or regular audits, increasing the risk of fraud or insolvency. Risk Indicator: The lack of valid regulation is a critical concern, rendering TRADESKA an unsafe choice for traders.

---

10. User Precautions ¶

To mitigate risks when considering TRADESKA LIMITED, users should:

1. Verify Regulation: Confirm the broker’s regulatory status with a top-tier authority (e.g., FCA, ASIC, SEC) before depositing funds. Use tools like BrokerCheck (FINRA) or regulatory databases.
2. Start with a Demo Account: Test the broker’s platform using its €10,000 demo account to assess performance and reliability without risking real money.
3. Research Reviews: Seek impartial reviews on platforms like WikiFX, BrokerChooser, or ForexBrokers.com. Be cautious of overly positive reviews, as they may be fabricated.
4. Check Withdrawal Terms: Request clear information on withdrawal processes, fees, and timelines before depositing funds. Avoid brokers with vague terms.
5. Use Small Deposits: If proceeding, start with the minimum deposit ($500) and test withdrawals to ensure funds can be accessed.
6. Monitor Leverage: Avoid using high leverage (e.g., 1:500) unless experienced, as it increases the risk of significant losses.
7. Secure Accounts: Use strong passwords and enable two-factor authentication (if available) to protect accounts from unauthorized access.
8. Report Issues: If problems arise (e.g., frozen funds, unresponsive support), file complaints with financial authorities or seek legal advice promptly. Recommendation: Given the high risks, users should avoid TRADESKA unless its regulatory status and legitimacy are independently verified.

---

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

• Similar Names:
• Tradesk (tradesk.co): A US-focused brokerage offering $0 commission on stocks, ETFs, and options. It has a different domain and business model, with no apparent connection to TRADESKA LIMITED.
• TRADESK SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED: An Indian company based in Kolkata, unrelated to forex or CFD trading, with no website listed.
• Tradesk Securities: Mentioned in a 2024 report as integrating Benzinga’s data, suggesting a fintech entity, but no clear link to TRADESKA LIMITED.
• Other Similar Names: Domains like tradesk.co.in, tradk.com, treksk.com, and otradesk.com have been flagged for potential scams or low trust, increasing the risk of confusion.
• Risk of Confusion: The similarity in names (e.g., “Tradesk” vs. “Tradeska”) could lead to accidental engagement with unrelated or fraudulent entities. Scammers often use similar branding to exploit trust in established brokers.
• Domain Proliferation: The existence of multiple similar domains (e.g., tradesvisions.com, flagged as a scam) suggests a pattern of copycat websites, potentially designed to mislead users. Risk Indicator: The potential for brand confusion is high due to similar names and domains, requiring users to verify the exact website (tradeska.com) and avoid mistaking it for unrelated or fraudulent entities.

---

12. Overall Assessment ¶

Summary:

• Legitimacy Concerns: TRADESKA LIMITED exhibits multiple red flags, including an unauthorized regulatory status, high leverage, a new domain, broken social media links, and a generic address. These factors suggest it is not a safe or trusted broker.
• Risk Level: High. The lack of regulation, transparency issues, and scam allegations outweigh the broker’s professional website and customer support claims.
• Recommendation: Avoid trading with TRADESKA LIMITED unless independent evidence of regulation and legitimacy emerges. Opt for brokers regulated by top-tier authorities (e.g., FCA, ASIC, SEC) to ensure fund safety and transparency. Final Note: Always conduct thorough due diligence before engaging with any broker. Use tools like BrokerCheck, ScamAdviser, or ForexBrokers.com to verify credentials, and prioritize regulated brokers to minimize risks. If you need further analysis or specific checks (e.g., social media profiles, additional reviews), please let me know!