Below is a comprehensive analysis of Pure Market Broker (Pure M Global LTD), based on the requested criteria using available information from online sources, including complaints, risk assessments, website security, WHOIS data, regulatory status, and more. The official website is https://www.puremarketbroker.com/.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

Online complaints about Pure Market Broker reveal a mixed picture with significant concerns:

• Trustpilot Reviews: Pure Market Broker has a 4-star rating on Trustpilot based on 27 reviews. Positive feedback highlights ease of account opening, fast deposits/withdrawals, and responsive customer service. However, negative reviews include complaints about unfulfilled withdrawal requests and lack of profits from investments, particularly in PAMM accounts. For example, one user reported no withdrawal request was recorded despite their claim, and another lost over 70% of their investment.
• Reviews.io: The broker has a low average score of 1.45/5 based on 11 reviews. Several users allege scams, reporting inability to withdraw funds and significant financial losses (e.g., one user claimed a loss of €99,000). Others mentioned contacting recovery services to retrieve funds, suggesting potential fraudulent practices.
• Forex Peace Army: Complaints include delays in withdrawals, with one user noting that after 120 days, the broker cited excessive swap fees to withhold funds. This raises concerns about transparency in fee structures and withdrawal processes.
• WikiFX: Users reported issues like inability to withdraw funds and poor communication. One user described a Ponzi scheme, and another mentioned a $67.21 deposit mishandled by the broker. However, some users praised the broker’s service and communication.
• General Sentiment: Negative reviews focus on withdrawal issues, lack of transparency, and financial losses, while positive reviews are fewer and emphasize operational efficiency. The prevalence of scam allegations and recovery service mentions is a significant concern. Red Flags: Consistent complaints about withdrawal delays, non-delivery of funds, and allegations of scams indicate potential operational or ethical issues.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

Risk assessments from various platforms classify Pure Market Broker as high-risk:

• Traders Union (2025): Assigns a TU Overall Score of 4.73/10, indicating higher-than-average risk. Experts recommend considering more reliable brokers due to client dissatisfaction and regulatory concerns. The safety score is 3.7/10, reflecting low security.
• WikiFX: Labels Pure Market as having a “suspicious regulatory license” and “high potential risk” due to its offshore regulation and clone license concerns. It has been operational for 2-5 years, which is relatively short for establishing trust.
• BrokersView (2025): Notes that transaction costs are higher compared to larger brokers, and the broker’s offshore regulation increases risk. It advises choosing strongly regulated brokers instead.
• Forex Peace Army: Highlights operational issues like withdrawal delays, contributing to a perception of risk. Risk Indicators:
• Offshore regulation (Vanuatu and SVG FSA) with limited oversight.
• High leverage (up to 1:200 or 1:400 in some cases), which amplifies financial risk.
• Lack of negative balance protection for non-EU clients, increasing exposure to losses.
• Mixed user experiences, with a notable portion reporting significant financial losses. Conclusion: The broker is considered high-risk due to regulatory weaknesses, operational complaints, and financial transparency issues.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

Website security analysis provides insight into the safety of https://www.puremarketbroker.com/:

• SSL Certificate: The website has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted data transmission. This is a basic security feature and does not guarantee legitimacy but indicates a secure connection.
• Cookies and Tracking: The site uses necessary, functional, performance, analytical, and advertisement cookies to enhance user experience and track interactions. While standard, advertisement cookies may raise privacy concerns for some users.
• SafelyWeb Analysis: Puremarket.com (related domain) has a mid-tier security rating of 36/100, factoring in hosting location, SSL presence, and lack of social media integration. The absence of linked social media accounts is noted as a potential red flag, as scam sites often avoid such connections to limit traceability.
• Cloudflare Usage: The site does not use Cloudflare’s DNS system, which could enhance security but is not a definitive indicator of risk. Red Flags:
• Lack of social media integration, which is unusual for a broker aiming to build trust.
• Mid-tier security rating suggests room for improvement in safeguarding user data. Conclusion: The website has basic security measures (SSL, cookies), but the lack of advanced protections and social media presence raises minor concerns.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

WHOIS data provides information about the domain’s registration:

• Domain: https://www.puremarketbroker.com/
• Registration Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided data, but a related domain (puremarket.com) was registered on July 22, 2023, with an expiration date of July 22, 2025. This suggests the broker’s online presence is relatively recent.
• Registrar: Likely Dynadot LLC, as indicated for puremarket.com. This is a common registrar and does not inherently indicate risk.
• Registrant Information: WHOIS data is not fully disclosed in the provided sources, but lack of transparency in domain ownership can be a red flag for financial platforms. Legitimate brokers typically provide clear contact details. Red Flags:
• Recent domain registration (if applicable to puremarketbroker.com) may indicate a newer, less-established operation.
• Lack of transparent WHOIS data could suggest an intent to obscure ownership. Conclusion: The domain’s recent registration and potential lack of transparent ownership details warrant caution.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

Hosting details provide context about the website’s infrastructure:

• Hosting Location: The website is hosted on servers in the United States.
• ISP: Not explicitly mentioned, but the absence of Cloudflare DNS suggests a different provider.
• Server Risk: The U.S. is a common hosting location and not inherently risky. However, scam sites often use generic hosting providers to remain anonymous, and the lack of Cloudflare may indicate less robust security. Red Flags:
• No mention of advanced hosting security measures (e.g., DDoS protection, dedicated servers).
• Lack of clarity on the hosting provider limits transparency. Conclusion: Hosting in the U.S. is neutral, but the absence of detailed security or provider information is a minor concern.

6. Social Media Presence ¶

Social media presence is a key indicator of legitimacy and engagement:

• SafelyWeb Findings: No social media accounts were found linked to puremarket.com or puremarketbroker.com. This is unusual for a broker, as legitimate firms typically maintain active profiles on platforms like Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook to engage clients.
• Implications: Scam sites often avoid social media to reduce traceability and accountability. The absence of profiles may indicate a lack of transparency or a deliberate attempt to limit public interaction. Red Flags:
• Complete lack of social media presence is a significant concern for a financial services provider.
• No evidence of community engagement or public-facing communication. Conclusion: The absence of social media accounts is a major red flag, suggesting potential issues with transparency or legitimacy.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

The following red flags and risk indicators emerge from the analysis:

• Regulatory Concerns: Offshore regulation by the Vanuatu Financial Services Commission (VFSC, license 14801) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Financial Services Authority (SVG FSA). SVG FSA does not regulate forex trading, and VFSC’s oversight is weak, with risks of clone licenses.
• Withdrawal Issues: Multiple complaints about delayed or blocked withdrawals, a common tactic among fraudulent brokers.
• High Leverage: Offering leverage up to 1:200 or 1:400 increases financial risk, especially for inexperienced traders.
• Lack of Negative Balance Protection: Non-EU clients are not protected, increasing the risk of significant losses.
• Scam Allegations: User reviews on Reviews.io and WikiFX include claims of Ponzi schemes and large-scale financial losses.
• No Social Media: The absence of social media accounts limits transparency and engagement.
• Mixed Reviews: While some users praise the broker, the volume of negative feedback outweighs positive sentiment, particularly regarding financial outcomes.
• Recent Domain: If the domain is recently registered (as with puremarket.com), it may indicate a newer operation with less established trust.
• High Transaction Costs: Reports of high spreads and commissions, especially for day trading or scalping, reduce profitability.
• PAMM Account Risks: Complaints about losses in PAMM accounts managed by third parties suggest potential mismanagement or lack of oversight. Conclusion: Multiple red flags, including regulatory weaknesses, withdrawal issues, and lack of transparency, indicate significant risks.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

Analysis of the website content (https://www.puremarketbroker.com/) reveals the following:

• Claims and Services:
• Describes itself as a “Real STP Forex Trading Broker” with PAMM accounts, IB programs, and spreads from 0.0 pips. Offers MT4 and MT5 platforms, forex pairs, CFDs, indices, metals, and commodities.
• Emphasizes security through segregated accounts with Tier 1 banks and a partnership with Pure Wallet UK. Claims not to use client funds for operations or proprietary trading.
• Highlights regulation by VFSC and compliance with AML/KYC standards.
• Regional Restrictions: The website explicitly states it is not directed at residents of countries like the U.S., UK, EU, Afghanistan, Cuba, Iran, and others due to regulatory restrictions. This limits its market and may indicate a focus on less-regulated jurisdictions.
• Risk Warnings: Includes standard risk disclosures about forex and CFD trading, advising clients to understand risks and seek independent advice.
• Educational Content: Offers video tutorials, articles, and market explanations, which is positive for beginner traders but not unique.
• Transparency Issues: Lacks detailed information about the company’s physical address, leadership team, or operational history. The focus on offshore regulation and vague ownership details reduces trust. Red Flags:
• Overemphasis on “seamless and secure” trading without verifiable evidence.
• Limited transparency about company operations and leadership.
• Regional restrictions may target clients in less-regulated markets, increasing scam risks. Conclusion: The website presents a professional facade but lacks transparency in key areas, and its regulatory claims are questionable.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

Regulatory status is critical for assessing a broker’s legitimacy:

• Claimed Regulation:
• Vanuatu Financial Services Commission (VFSC): License number 14801 under Pure M Global LTD. VFSC is an offshore regulator with limited oversight, and some brokers misuse VFSC licenses (clone licenses). Verification is challenging due to VFSC’s lack of public domain authentication.
• Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Financial Services Authority (SVG FSA): SVG FSA does not regulate forex trading or issue licenses for such activities, rendering this claim irrelevant for forex legitimacy.
• UK Regulation Claim: Some sources mention a UK entity (Pure Market Broker UK) regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA, license 725804). However, this is inconsistent with the website’s disclaimer that it does not target UK/EU residents and operates outside MiFID II. This discrepancy suggests potential misrepresentation.
• Lack of Tier-1 Regulation: The broker lacks oversight from reputable regulators like the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), or CFTC (U.S.), which are standard for trustworthy brokers.
• Investor Protection: No mention of participation in investor compensation schemes, and insurance coverage claims (up to $500,000 per client) lack verifiable details. Red Flags:
• Offshore regulation (VFSC) with weak oversight and clone license risks.
• SVG FSA’s irrelevance to forex regulation undermines credibility.
• Inconsistent claims about FCA regulation raise concerns about misrepresentation.
• No evidence of robust investor protection mechanisms. Conclusion: The broker’s regulatory status is weak, relying on offshore jurisdictions with limited accountability, increasing the risk of fraud or mismanagement.

10. User Precautions ¶

To mitigate risks when considering Pure Market Broker, users should:

• Verify Regulation: Independently confirm the VFSC license (14801) through Vanuatu’s regulatory portal, if available, and be wary of clone licenses. Avoid relying on SVG FSA claims.
• Start Small: Deposit the minimum amount ($100) to test the platform’s reliability, especially withdrawal processes.
• Check Withdrawals: Request a small withdrawal early to verify the process. Be cautious if delays or excessive fees occur.
• Research Reviews: Cross-reference user reviews on Trustpilot, Reviews.io, WikiFX, and Forex Peace Army, focusing on withdrawal and scam complaints.
• Avoid High Leverage: Be cautious with leverage (1:200 or 1:400), as it amplifies losses. Understand the risks of forex and CFD trading.
• Secure Accounts: Use strong passwords and enable two-factor authentication (if available) to protect personal and financial data.
• Seek Advice: Consult independent financial advisors before investing, especially in PAMM accounts managed by third parties.
• Monitor Social Media: The lack of social media presence is a red flag. Verify any unofficial accounts claiming affiliation with the broker.
• Report Issues: If scammed, file complaints with platforms like BrokersView, Scams Report, or local authorities. Recovery services may help but should be vetted for legitimacy. Conclusion: Users must exercise extreme caution, prioritize withdrawal testing, and thoroughly research the broker’s credibility.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

Brand confusion can arise due to similar names or affiliations:

• Related Domains: Pure Market Broker is part of Pure M Global LTD, which operates other sites like PureMarket.global, PriceMarkets.com, RealMarketBroker.com, and Avantgarde-FX.com. This network of related brands may confuse users or obscure operational transparency.
• Pure Wallet UK: The broker emphasizes a partnership with Pure Wallet UK for fund security. However, there is no clear information about this entity’s regulation or legitimacy, which could mislead users into assuming stronger protections.
• Similar Names: The name “Pure Market” is generic and could be confused with other brokers or financial firms, such as “Pure Markets” or “Prime Market.” This may be intentional to leverage established brand trust.
• FCA Misrepresentation: Claims of FCA regulation for a UK entity (Pure Market Broker UK) conflict with the website’s disclaimer, potentially causing confusion about regulatory status. Red Flags:
• Multiple related domains under the same parent company may obscure accountability.
• Vague references to Pure Wallet UK without verifiable details.
• Inconsistent regulatory claims (FCA vs. offshore) could mislead users. Conclusion: The broker’s network of related brands and unclear affiliations increase the risk of brand confusion, potentially exploiting user trust.

12. Overall Assessment and Recommendations ¶

Summary:

• Legitimacy Concerns: Pure Market Broker presents significant risks due to offshore regulation (VFSC, SVG FSA), withdrawal complaints, scam allegations, and lack of transparency. While some users report positive experiences, the volume of negative feedback and red flags outweighs these.
• Regulatory Weakness: The reliance on Vanuatu and SVG FSA, coupled with questionable FCA claims, undermines credibility. Offshore regulation is a major risk factor.
• Operational Risks: Withdrawal delays, high transaction costs, and PAMM account losses suggest operational or ethical issues.
• Security and Transparency: Basic website security (SSL) is in place, but the lack of social media, recent domain registration, and limited ownership details reduce trust.
• User Precautions: Start with minimal deposits, test withdrawals, and verify all claims independently. Avoid high-leverage trading and PAMM accounts without thorough due diligence. Recommendations:
• Avoid for Most Traders: Given the high-risk profile, most traders, especially beginners, should consider more reputable brokers with Tier-1 regulation (e.g., FCA, ASIC, CFTC).
• Experienced Traders: If considering Pure Market Broker, use it cautiously with small investments, rigorous withdrawal testing, and constant monitoring of account activity.
• Further Research: Check updated reviews on platforms like Forex Peace Army, WikiFX, and BrokersView before engaging. Verify VFSC license details directly with the regulator.
• Report Scams: If issues arise, report to regulatory bodies, complaint platforms, or recovery services (after vetting their legitimacy). Final Verdict: Pure Market Broker exhibits multiple red flags, including weak regulation, withdrawal issues, and transparency concerns, making it a high-risk choice. Traders should proceed with extreme caution or opt for more established, strongly regulated brokers to minimize financial risks.

If you need further details, specific checks (e.g., real-time WHOIS lookup), or analysis of another broker, let me know!