Below is a detailed analysis of 4xCube Ltd (operating as 4XC, official website: https://4xc.com/) based on the requested criteria, including online complaints, risk assessment, website security, WHOIS lookup, IP and hosting analysis, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion. The information is synthesized from available data, including the provided search results, and critically evaluated to offer a balanced perspective. Note that some aspects, such as real-time WHOIS or IP analysis, are summarized based on general practices and available data, as direct access to certain tools is not performed here.

1. Broker Overview ¶

• Company Name: 4xCube Ltd (operating as 4XC)
• Official Website: https://4xc.com/
• Established: 2018
• Services: Offers trading in forex, CFDs, metals, indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies, and forward contracts via MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5) platforms.
• Location: Registered in the Cook Islands, with a registered address at Global House, Avarua, Rarotonga, Cook Islands (Registration No. ICA 12767/2018).
• Rebranding: Previously operated as 4xCube, rebranded to 4XC in 2020 to reflect updated branding and services.

2. Online Complaint Information ¶

Online reviews and complaints about 4XC are mixed, reflecting both positive and negative trader experiences. Key points include:

• Positive Feedback:
• Many users praise 4XC for fast execution, low spreads (starting at 0.2 pips for Pro accounts), and responsive customer support, particularly highlighting individuals like Andrei L. (Business Development Manager).
• Trustpilot reviews show a 4-star rating based on 525–573 reviews, with users commending quick withdrawals (often within 1 day), competitive spreads, and a user-friendly platform.
• Some traders, especially beginners, appreciate the low minimum deposit ($10 for Standard accounts) and educational resources like e-books and platform guides.
• Negative Feedback:
• Complaints include allegations of account freezes, unexplained losses, and lack of transparency. For example, one user reported a €9,000 loss attributed to manipulated trading operations, though 4XC clarified they are an STP (Straight Through Processing) broker and do not intervene in trades.
• A user on WikiFX reported depositing $392 and losing funds after a 40% gain, with no clear explanation, and another mentioned a €3,500 managed account being liquidated without transparency.
• Historical complaints from 2019, when the broker was 4xCube, include accusations of scams, such as frozen accounts and unresponsive support. One user reported depositing €923, only for their account to be frozen without explanation.
• Some users criticized high spreads on certain assets (e.g., $1.65 spread on a $10 stock vs. $0.03 elsewhere) and high withdrawal fees, which may deter active traders.
• Critical Evaluation:
• Negative reviews often lack detailed evidence and may stem from trading losses rather than broker misconduct. However, recurring themes of account freezes and transparency issues warrant caution.
• Positive reviews may be influenced by promotional campaigns or biased feedback, as some brokers incentivize favorable reviews. The high volume of 4-star Trustpilot reviews suggests possible review management, though no direct evidence supports this.

3. Risk Level Assessment ¶

Based on available data, 4XC’s risk level is moderate to high, primarily due to its regulatory status and mixed user feedback. Key factors include:

• Regulatory Risk:
• 4XC is regulated by the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) of the Cook Islands (License No. MC03/2018) and holds a money-changing business license. The FSC is a Tier-3 regulator, offering weaker oversight compared to Tier-1 regulators like the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), or CySEC (EU).
• The Cook Islands lacks an investor compensation fund, meaning clients may lose their entire investment if the broker becomes insolvent.
• A 2019 ASIC warning flagged 4xCube as an unlicensed entity involved in a potential cold-calling scam, though the warning was later removed after contestation. This incident damaged the broker’s reputation and may explain the rebranding to 4XC.
• Membership in FinaCom (Hong Kong) provides up to $20,000 in compensation per complaint, but this is not equivalent to robust financial regulation.
• Operational Risk:
• High leverage (up to 1:500) increases the risk of significant losses, especially for inexperienced traders.
• Negative balance protection is available only for forex and metals, leaving other CFDs exposed to losses beyond deposits.
• Complaints about unexplained account liquidations and lack of transparency in managed accounts suggest potential operational weaknesses or mismanagement.
• Financial Risk:
• Client funds are segregated in accounts with reputable institutions like Bank of America and Deutsche Bank, reducing the risk of misuse. However, segregation is a standard practice and does not eliminate all financial risks.
• High withdrawal fees and daily transaction limits may restrict access to funds, posing liquidity risks for active traders.
• Risk Score: Traders Union assigns 4XC a safety score of 4.2/10, indicating a low security level due to the lack of Tier-1 regulation and limited investor protections.

4. Website Security Tools ¶

The 4XC website (https://4xc.com/) employs standard security measures, but specific details are inferred from general practices and available data:

• SSL Encryption:
• The website uses HTTPS, indicating SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) encryption to protect data transmission. This is standard for financial websites and prevents third-party interception of sensitive information like login credentials or payment details.
• No specific vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated SSL protocols) are reported, but users should verify the SSL certificate via their browser for authenticity.
• Data Protection:
• 4XC claims to adhere to strict financial standards, including Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) protocols, which require identity verification to prevent fraud.
• Client funds are held in segregated accounts, reducing the risk of misuse by the broker.
• Potential Weaknesses:
• No mention of advanced security features like two-factor authentication (2FA) for account logins or biometric verification, which are increasingly common among reputable brokers.
• The website’s sleek design and intuitive interface are praised, but no independent audits (e.g., penetration testing) are referenced to confirm robust cybersecurity.
• Recommendations:
• Users should ensure their browser displays a valid SSL certificate (e.g., issued by a trusted authority like Let’s Encrypt or DigiCert).
• Enable 2FA on email accounts linked to 4XC to enhance security, even if not offered directly by the platform.

5. WHOIS Lookup ¶

Based on available data, a WHOIS lookup for https://4xc.com/ provides the following insights:

• Domain Registration:
• Registered: September 20, 2015.
• Registrar: Likely a standard provider like GoDaddy or Namecheap (exact registrar not specified in sources).
• Registrant: 4xCube Ltd, registered in the Cook Islands. No evidence of domain privacy protection hiding registrant details, which aligns with transparency for a financial services provider.
• Domain Age:
• The domain’s age (nearly 10 years as of April 2025) suggests stability, as scam brokers often use newly registered domains. However, the broker’s operational history began in 2018, indicating the domain may have been repurposed or acquired.
• Red Flags:
• No reported issues with domain ownership or suspicious registrant details. However, users should verify WHOIS data independently via tools like ICANN Lookup or Whois.domaintools.com to confirm no recent changes or anomalies.

6. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

Specific IP and hosting details for 4xc.com are not provided in the sources, but general inferences and best practices are applied:

• Hosting:
• The website is likely hosted on a reputable cloud provider (e.g., AWS, Google Cloud, or Cloudflare) given its global accessibility and fast load times reported by users.
• 4XC claims to use “lightning-fast servers in LD4 data centers” for trading execution, suggesting robust infrastructure for low-latency trading.
• IP Geolocation:
• The IP is likely tied to a data center in a major financial hub (e.g., London, New York, or Singapore) to support global trading. No evidence suggests hosting in high-risk jurisdictions known for lax oversight.
• Security:
• Hosting providers like Cloudflare offer DDoS protection and Web Application Firewalls (WAF), which 4XC likely employs given its professional website design.
• No reported outages or hosting-related complaints, but users should monitor site uptime using tools like Pingdom or UptimeRobot.
• Recommendations:
• Use a VPN to mask your IP when accessing the site to reduce geolocation-based risks.
• Check the site’s IP via tools like Site24x7 or MXToolbox to confirm it aligns with a reputable hosting provider.

7. Social Media Presence ¶

4XC maintains an active social media presence, which is typical for brokers aiming to engage clients and promote services:

• Platforms:
• Twitter/X: Likely active under @4XC_Official or similar (exact handle not specified). Posts may include market updates, promotions, and customer engagement.
• Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn: Common for brokers to share educational content, trading signals, and awards. 4XC’s sponsorship of tennis star Hamad Medjedovic and team-building events (e.g., yacht trips) are likely promoted on these platforms.
• TradingView: 4XC partners with TradingView, offering promotions and integrating its platform for charting and social trading.
• Engagement:
• Positive user reviews mention responsive support via social media, though some complaints note ignored messages during disputes.
• Promotions like a 50% first deposit bonus are heavily marketed on social media, which may attract inexperienced traders.
• Red Flags:
• Aggressive marketing of bonuses or high-leverage trading (1:500) may appeal to risk-tolerant traders but can mislead novices about risks.
• No evidence of fake followers or bot-driven engagement, but users should verify account authenticity (e.g., check for verified badges or consistent posting history).

8. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Several red flags and risk indicators emerge from the analysis:

• Regulatory Concerns:
• The Cook Islands FSC is an offshore regulator with minimal oversight, lacking the stringent standards of FCA, ASIC, or CySEC. This increases the risk of inadequate client protections.
• The 2019 ASIC warning about 4xCube’s potential involvement in a cold-calling scam, even if retracted, raises questions about past practices.
• Transparency Issues:
• Complaints about unexplained account liquidations and lack of access to trading details in managed accounts suggest potential opacity.
• The broker’s claim of not intervening in trades (as an STP broker) conflicts with user reports of manipulated operations, though no conclusive evidence supports these claims.
• High-Risk Features:
• Leverage up to 1:500 is among the highest in the industry, posing significant risks for inexperienced traders.
• High spreads on certain assets (e.g., stocks) and withdrawal fees may erode profits, particularly for active traders.
• Historical Reputation:
• Negative reviews from the 4xCube era (pre-2020) include serious allegations of scams, ID fraud, and advance fee fraud, some linked to investigations by ASIC and Perth WA Police. While these may not reflect current operations, they damage trust.
• Marketing Practices:
• Aggressive promotions (e.g., 50% deposit bonuses, AI-powered trade ideas) may oversimplify trading risks, targeting beginners who may not understand CFD complexities.

9. Website Content Analysis ¶

The 4XC website (https://4xc.com/) is described as sleek, intuitive, and professional, with the following observations:

• Content Quality:
• Provides detailed information on trading conditions, account types (Standard, Pro, VIP), and platforms (MT4, MT5, TradingView).
• Offers educational resources, including e-books on technical analysis, platform guides, and an economic calendar, which are valuable for beginners.
• Promotes features like copy trading, PAMM accounts, and AI-powered trade ideas, catering to both active and passive traders.
• Transparency:
• Clearly states regulatory status (Cook Islands FSC, License No. MC03/2018) and segregation of client funds, which aligns with industry standards.
• Terms and conditions highlight risks of CFD trading and leverage, though these warnings may be overlooked by novice traders.
• Potential Issues:
• The website emphasizes bonuses and high leverage, which may downplay risks for inexperienced users.
• No mention of advanced security features (e.g., 2FA) or independent audits, which could reassure users about platform safety.

10. Regulatory Status ¶

• Primary Regulator: Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) of the Cook Islands (License No. MC03/2018).
• Additional Oversight: Member of FinaCom (Hong Kong), offering up to $20,000 in dispute resolution compensation.
• Other Claims: Some sources incorrectly state regulation by FCA, CySEC, or Labuan FSA, but these are unverified and likely erroneous. 4XC’s official website confirms only FSC regulation.
• Critical Evaluation:
• The Cook Islands is an offshore jurisdiction with lenient regulatory requirements, making it easier for brokers to obtain licenses but offering limited recourse for clients.
• The absence of Tier-1 regulation (e.g., FCA, ASIC) is a significant drawback for risk-averse traders seeking robust protections.
• FinaCom membership provides some security, but it is not a substitute for government-backed regulation.

11. User Precautions ¶

To mitigate risks when trading with 4XC, users should adopt the following precautions:

• Due Diligence:
• Verify 4XC’s regulatory status directly with the Cook Islands FSC (https://www.fsc.gov.ck/) and cross-check license details.
• Read multiple review sources (e.g., Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army, WikiFX) to assess user experiences, but filter for biased or unverified claims.
• Risk Management:
• Start with a demo account to test the platform and strategies without financial risk.
• Use low leverage (e.g., 1:10 or 1:20) to minimize losses, especially given 4XC’s high leverage offerings.
• Set stop-loss orders and adhere to strict risk management rules to protect capital.
• Security Measures:
• Ensure your device is secure (e.g., updated antivirus, strong passwords) when accessing 4XC’s website or platforms.
• Monitor account activity regularly and report suspicious behavior (e.g., unauthorized trades) to support immediately.
• Financial Caution:
• Deposit only what you can afford to lose, given the lack of an investor compensation fund.
• Be wary of bonuses, as they often come with trading volume requirements that may lock funds.
• Dispute Resolution:
• Document all interactions with 4XC (e.g., emails, live chat transcripts) in case of disputes.
• Contact FinaCom for complaints if 4XC’s support is unresponsive, but explore legal options in your jurisdiction for significant losses.

12. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

• Rebranding:
• The transition from 4xCube to 4XC in 2020 may cause confusion, as older reviews and complaints refer to 4xCube. This is compounded by the 2019 ASIC warning, which targeted 4xCube.
• Users searching for 4XC may encounter outdated or negative information about 4xCube, potentially misinforming their decision.
• Similar Names:
• Brokers with similar names, such as 4xEx (unregulated and flagged as a scam) or 4x.fm (also unregulated), may be confused with 4XC.
• For example, 4xEx is criticized for lacking transparency and regulation, which could tarnish 4XC’s reputation if mistaken for it.
• Mitigation:
• Always verify the broker’s official website (https://4xc.com/) and registration details (4xCube Ltd, Cook Islands) to avoid confusion.
• Check for the FSC license number (MC03/2018) on official documents to confirm authenticity.

13. Conclusion and Recommendations ¶

Summary:

• Strengths: 4XC offers competitive trading conditions, including low spreads, fast execution, and access to MT4/MT5 platforms. Its low minimum deposit ($10–$50) and educational resources appeal to beginners, while copy trading and PAMM accounts cater to passive investors. Positive reviews highlight responsive support and quick withdrawals.
• Weaknesses: The broker’s offshore regulation (Cook Islands FSC) and lack of Tier-1 oversight raise significant concerns about client protections. Historical complaints about account freezes, transparency issues, and a 2019 ASIC warning (though retracted) damage trust. High leverage and aggressive marketing may mislead inexperienced traders.
• Risk Level: Moderate to high, primarily due to weak regulation and mixed user feedback. Traders Union’s 4.2/10 safety score reflects these concerns. Recommendations:
• For Beginners: Consider 4XC only for small, low-risk investments using a demo account first. Prioritize brokers with Tier-1 regulation (e.g., FCA, ASIC) for better security.
• For Experienced Traders: 4XC’s low spreads and high leverage may be attractive, but use strict risk management and verify withdrawal reliability before committing significant capital.
• General Advice: Conduct thorough due diligence, avoid over-reliance on bonuses, and explore alternatives like Interactive Brokers, XTB, or Plus500, which offer stronger regulatory protections. Final Note: While 4XC appears to operate legitimately and has improved since its 4xCube days, its offshore regulation and historical red flags necessitate caution. Traders should weigh the benefits of low costs and platform features against the risks of limited oversight and potential operational issues.

Sources ¶

All information is derived from the provided search results, critically evaluated for accuracy and relevance. Citations are included where specific data points are referenced (e.g.,). For real-time WHOIS, IP, or hosting analysis, users are advised to use tools like ICANN Lookup, Site24x7, or Cloudflare Radar. If further details are needed, I can assist with specific follow-up queries or guide you to appropriate tools.