Below is a comprehensive analysis of AssetsFX (Assets Global Ltd), operating under the official website https://assetsfx.org/, based on the requested criteria. The analysis draws from available online information, including complaints, risk assessments, website security, WHOIS data, IP and hosting details, social media presence, red flags, regulatory status, user precautions, and potential brand confusion.

1. Online Complaint Information ¶

AssetsFX has garnered significant negative feedback across various platforms, raising concerns about its legitimacy and operational practices:

• Forex Peace Army (FPA): Multiple complaints highlight issues such as withdrawal delays, account bans, and outright refusal to process withdrawals. One user reported their account being banned after a deposit, with profits confiscated. Another noted being forced to close their account without receiving their balance. The FPA issued a warning in 2013 about suspicious positive reviews, suggesting potential review manipulation.
• Scam Detector: AssetsFX received a low trust score of 42.8, flagged as “Controversial. Risky. Red Flags.” Complaints include unsolicited contacts, phishing risks, and spamming behavior.
• Valforex: Describes AssetsFX as an unregulated offshore broker with a history of complaints dating back to 2002, including withdrawal blockages and lack of transparency about its non-compliant status.
• RefundRush and Fund-Recovery: Reports indicate login problems, disappearance of the platform, and demands for additional fees (e.g., “withdrawal taxes”), which are hallmarks of scams. Customers noted evasive responses when seeking clarification.
• WikiFX: User reviews express disappointment with poor trading conditions and warn against trusting an offshore broker. The platform is flagged for operating beyond its regulatory scope.
• Trustpilot: While AssetsFX has a 4-star rating based on 123 reviews, some positive reviews appear promotional or vague, potentially indicating bias. However, negative reviews align with complaints about withdrawal issues and poor customer service. Summary: The volume and consistency of complaints about withdrawal issues, account access problems, and lack of transparency suggest significant operational risks. The history of complaints spans over two decades, indicating persistent issues.

2. Risk Level Assessment ¶

Based on the Scam Detector’s trust score (42.8) and other sources, AssetsFX is considered a medium-to-high risk platform due to:

• Unregulated Status: Operates without oversight from reputable financial regulators, increasing the risk of fund mismanagement or fraud.
• Offshore Registration: Registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a jurisdiction known for lax financial regulations, which offers little investor protection.
• Complaint Volume: Persistent issues with withdrawals and account access indicate operational unreliability.
• Suspicious Practices: Reports of unsolicited calls, manipulated demo accounts (showing unrealistic winning trades), and demands for additional fees are red flags for potential scams. Risk Level: High. The combination of unregulated status, offshore registration, and consistent complaints suggests a high likelihood of financial risk for users.

3. Website Security Tools ¶

An analysis of the website’s security features reveals the following:

• SSL Certificate: The website uses an SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted data transmission. However, the certificate is a Domain Validated (DV) type, which offers minimal validation and does not confirm the legitimacy of the business.
• Security Headers: No detailed information is available on specific security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options), but complaints about insecure login and deposit pages (e.g., lacking HTTPS lock icons) suggest potential vulnerabilities.
• Firewall/Protection: The website is hosted via Cloudflare, Inc. (ISP: AS13335), which provides DDoS protection and CDN services. However, this does not address application-level security issues.
• User Data Privacy: AssetsFX claims to record and analyze user activities for security and marketing purposes, but the use of public networks for data transmission raises concerns about interception risks. Summary: While basic encryption is in place, the use of a low-validation SSL certificate and reported issues with insecure pages indicate moderate security risks. Users should exercise caution when entering sensitive information.

4. WHOIS Lookup ¶

WHOIS data for https://assetsfx.org/ provides the following insights:

• Domain Registration: The domain was registered on February 21, 2012, indicating a long operational history. However, multiple IP changes (7 over 11 years) suggest instability or attempts to obscure operations.
• Registrant Information: The registrant’s name is withheld, a common practice for anonymity but a red flag for transparency in financial services.
• Registrar: The domain is managed by Gname.com Pte. Ltd., a registrar often used by low-cost or questionable websites. Summary: The anonymous registrant and frequent IP changes raise concerns about transparency and operational stability, aligning with scam indicators.

5. IP and Hosting Analysis ¶

• ISP: Cloudflare, Inc. (AS13335), a reputable provider for CDN and DDoS protection.
• Server Location: San Francisco, California, USA. This may not align with the company’s claimed registration in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, raising questions about operational consistency.
• IP Changes: Seven IP changes over 11 years suggest potential rehosting to evade detection or complaints. Summary: While Cloudflare provides robust hosting infrastructure, the mismatch between server location and company registration, combined with frequent IP changes, is concerning.

6. Social Media Presence ¶

• Presence: AssetsFX maintains a presence on platforms like Trustpilot and possibly others, but specific social media accounts (e.g., Twitter, Facebook) are not prominently detailed in the provided data.
• Engagement: Trustpilot reviews show mixed feedback, with some positive reviews appearing promotional or orchestrated. Negative reviews align with broader complaints about withdrawals and service.
• Risks: The FDIC notes that financial institutions using social media face reputation risks from unaddressed complaints or misleading statements. AssetsFX’s lack of transparency in responding to negative feedback amplifies these risks. Summary: Limited and potentially manipulated social media engagement, coupled with unaddressed complaints, suggests a lack of accountability.

7. Red Flags and Potential Risk Indicators ¶

Several red flags indicate potential risks with AssetsFX:

• Unregulated Status: No oversight from major regulators like the FCA, ASIC, or CFTC. The claimed NFA license (0549980) is flagged as unauthorized and operating beyond its scope.
• Offshore Registration: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is a known haven for unregulated brokers, offering minimal investor protection.
• Withdrawal Issues: Consistent reports of blocked withdrawals, demands for additional fees, and account bans.
• Manipulated Demo Accounts: The demo account reportedly shows unrealistic winning trades, potentially luring inexperienced traders.
• Unsolicited Contacts: Complaints about unsolicited calls and personal data misuse suggest privacy violations.
• Lack of Transparency: No clear disclosure of licensing, ownership, or operational details. The “About Us” page provides minimal verifiable information.
• Suspicious Reviews: Positive reviews on platforms like Trustpilot and FPA appear orchestrated, while negative reviews are consistent across sources.
• High Leverage: Offers leverage up to 1:500, which is risky for inexperienced traders and exceeds levels deemed safe by many regulators.
• Extravagant Claims: Promises of low fees, tight spreads, and high returns without clear risk disclosures align with scam tactics. Summary: Multiple red flags, including unregulated status, offshore registration, and operational issues, strongly suggest AssetsFX is a high-risk platform.

8. Website Content Analysis ¶

• Claims: The website promotes AssetsFX as a “leading platform” for trading forex, crypto, and stocks, emphasizing low fees, fast execution, and tight spreads. It offers demo accounts, webinars, and market analysis.
• Risk Disclosures: The website acknowledges that CFDs are complex and carry high risks, advising users not to risk more than they can afford to lose. However, this disclosure is standard and does not mitigate other concerns.
• Transparency: The site lists AssetsFX Global Ltd as the operator, registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (26438BC 2021). However, it lacks detailed information about ownership, licensing, or audited financials.
• Professionalism: The site appears professional but lacks depth in educational resources and verifiable credentials compared to regulated brokers. Summary: The website presents a polished front but lacks transparency and verifiable credentials, aligning with characteristics of questionable brokers.

9. Regulatory Status ¶

• Claimed Regulation: AssetsFX claims to be regulated by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, this jurisdiction is not recognized as a robust regulatory body, and no evidence of a valid FSC license is provided.
• NFA Status: WikiFX reports an NFA license (0549980) with an “abnormal” and “unauthorized” status, indicating it operates beyond its regulatory scope.
• Major Regulators: No oversight from reputable regulators like the FCA, ASIC, CySEC, or CFTC, which is a significant red flag for a financial broker.
• Previous Claims: Earlier reviews mentioned a registration in Mauritius (Assets Multi Ltd), but current information points to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, suggesting potential rebranding or jurisdictional shifts to evade scrutiny. Summary: AssetsFX is effectively unregulated, as Saint Vincent and the Grenadines offers minimal oversight, and the claimed NFA license is invalid. This exposes users to significant risks.

10. User Precautions ¶

To protect against potential risks when considering AssetsFX, users should:

• Verify Regulation: Always confirm a broker’s regulatory status with reputable authorities (e.g., FCA, ASIC, CFTC) before depositing funds. Avoid unregulated brokers.
• Research Complaints: Check platforms like Forex Peace Army, Trustpilot, and WikiFX for user experiences. Persistent withdrawal issues are a major red flag.
• Avoid Additional Fees: Do not pay “withdrawal taxes” or other fees demanded by the broker, as these are fraudulent tactics.
• Use Demo Accounts: Test the platform with a demo account, but be wary of manipulated results designed to lure deposits.
• Secure Personal Data: Avoid sharing sensitive information (e.g., bank details, passwords) on unsecured pages. Use two-factor authentication where possible.
• Report Issues: If you encounter problems (e.g., login issues, withdrawal denials), report to the SEC, CFTC, or local regulators immediately.
• Consult Experts: Seek advice from financial professionals or scam recovery services (e.g., refundrush.com, fund-recovery.net) if you suspect fraud.
• Limit Deposits: Start with small deposits to test withdrawal processes before committing significant funds. Summary: Users must exercise extreme caution, prioritize regulated brokers, and thoroughly research AssetsFX before engaging.

11. Potential Brand Confusion ¶

• Similar Names: The name “AssetsFX” is generic and could be confused with other brokers or financial services, such as “Assets Multi Ltd” (previously associated with AssetsFX) or unrelated entities like “ADSS” or “Swissacess.Trade.”
• Rebranding History: The shift from Mauritius to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, along with multiple IP changes, suggests potential rebranding to distance from past complaints.
• Impersonation Risks: Fraudsters may exploit the generic name to create fake websites or social media profiles mimicking AssetsFX, as warned by the SEC. Users should verify the official URL (https://assetsfx.org/) and contact details. Summary: The generic name and history of jurisdictional shifts increase the risk of brand confusion, requiring users to verify the platform’s identity carefully.

12. Overall Assessment and Recommendations ¶

Conclusion: AssetsFX (Assets Global Ltd) presents significant risks based on its unregulated status, offshore registration, consistent complaints, and multiple red flags. The platform’s history of withdrawal issues, lack of transparency, and questionable practices (e.g., manipulated demo accounts, unsolicited contacts) align with characteristics of potential scams. While the website appears professional and offers standard trading features, the absence of robust regulation and verifiable credentials outweighs any positives. Recommendations:

1. Avoid Engagement: Given the high risk, users should avoid depositing funds with AssetsFX and opt for regulated brokers overseen by authorities like the FCA, ASIC, or CFTC.
2. Due Diligence: Conduct thorough research on any broker, prioritizing regulatory status and user reviews from reputable sources.
3. Report Suspected Fraud: If you’ve experienced issues with AssetsFX, report to regulators (e.g., SEC, CFTC) or consult scam recovery services.
4. Secure Alternatives: Choose brokers with transparent licensing, audited financials, and strong reputations, such as AvaTrade or XM, as suggested by some reviews. Final Risk Rating: High Risk. AssetsFX’s operational practices and lack of regulatory oversight make it an unsuitable choice for most traders.

If you need further analysis or assistance with specific aspects (e.g., contacting regulators, recovering funds), please let me know!